VOR technigue, don't overshoot

I guess my medical school teachers were pretty stupid as well. At least they
wouldn't tolerate lazy students who pleaded ignorance when they could look
things up, or worse, people who gave BS answers and made up responses
instead of taking responsibility for not knowing.

Of course, Anthony has expounded at length on medicine as well as law,
although he knows as little about these subjects as he does about flying.

Viperdoc writes:

I guess my medical school teachers were pretty stupid as well. At least they
wouldn't tolerate lazy students who pleaded ignorance when they could look
things up, or worse, people who gave BS answers and made up responses
instead of taking responsibility for not knowing.

How did they treat students who spent their time attacking other students
instead of studying and participating in class?

Anthony, your response suggests that somehow you have taken offense at my
responses. Have any of them been factually incorrect? I'm rather surprised
since you have stated on multiple times that you were immune to personal
insults and had little emotional response in this regard.

I have simply been attempting to accurately point out that despite your
pronouncements you are not a pilot, and have actually no experience at all
regarding flying (or medicine or law).

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Viperdoc writes:

I guess my medical school teachers were pretty stupid as well. At least
they
wouldn't tolerate lazy students who pleaded ignorance when they could
look
things up, or worse, people who gave BS answers and made up responses
instead of taking responsibility for not knowing.

How did they treat students who spent their time attacking other students
instead of studying and participating in class?

If a student was continuously disrupting the class, it wouldn't be up to the
real students to respond. The disruptive student would be banned from
further participation.

If, for some reason, the administration refused to act to remove the
disruption, the students would be justified in taking it upon themselves to
remove the disruption.

The short answer is that you would get you ass kicked one way or another.
Cowering in your apartment wouldn't save you.

Beauciphus writes:

If a student was continuously disrupting the class, it wouldn't be up to the
real students to respond. The disruptive student would be banned from
further participation.

Are constant personal attacks directed at other students disruptive?

If, for some reason, the administration refused to act to remove the
disruption, the students would be justified in taking it upon themselves to
remove the disruption.

How would they go about that?

The short answer is that you would get you ass kicked one way or another.

So you advocate violence? Do you feel frustrated?

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...

So you advocate violence? Do you feel frustrated?

Stepped right in it again.

Anthony, what did your last post have to do with aviation? I thought you
were immune to the opinions of others, and didn't care what others thought?

No matter how much you read or think you know, you have no credibility since
you have zero experience, and this applies to law, medicine, flying, or
breast feeding.

"Viperdoc" wrote in message
...
Anthony, what did your last post have to do with aviation? I thought you
were immune to the opinions of others, and didn't care what others
thought?

No matter how much you read or think you know, you have no credibility
since
you have zero experience, and this applies to law, medicine, flying, or
breast feeding.

He's about as predictable as gravity, and pretty easily provoked to show off
his ignorance.

Viperdoc wrote:

Anthony, what did your last post have to do with aviation? I thought you
were immune to the opinions of others, and didn't care what others thought?

No matter how much you read or think you know, you have no credibility since
you have zero experience, and this applies to law, medicine, flying, or
breast feeding.


But, he is very good at eating Pizza.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Beauciphus writes:


If a student was continuously disrupting the class, it wouldn't be up to the
real students to respond. The disruptive student would be banned from
further participation.


Are constant personal attacks directed at other students disruptive?


If, for some reason, the administration refused to act to remove the
disruption, the students would be justified in taking it upon themselves to
remove the disruption.


How would they go about that?


The short answer is that you would get you ass kicked one way or another.


So you advocate violence? Do you feel frustrated?

Where did he advocate violence. The only violence is that committed by
you, the loud, unqualified imposter.