Extended full-power in small pistons

John Smith wrote:
Viperdoc wrote:
There is no question that it would be ideal to have an aircraft engine
work like a car engine, e.g. FADEC. However, complexity also adds
further possible failure modes.

The old argument. Interesting, though, that modern car engines are much
more reliable than older (simpler) ones.

If all other things are held constant, then simpler is usually more
reliable. Modern car engines have the benefit of much better
manufacturing techniques, better understanding of fatigue,
better oil, etc etc etc.

Bob Noel wrote:
If all other things are held constant, then simpler is usually more
reliable. Modern car engines have the benefit of much better
manufacturing techniques, better understanding of fatigue,
better oil, etc etc etc.

.... and electronic control. Electronic parts are usually much more
reliable than mechanical parts.

John Smith writes:

... and electronic control. Electronic parts are usually much more
reliable than mechanical parts.

But when they are combined with software, the opposite may prove to be true.

In rec.aviation.piloting Mxsmanic wrote:
John Smith writes:

... and electronic control. Electronic parts are usually much more
reliable than mechanical parts.

But when they are combined with software, the opposite may prove to be true.

And it may not, which makes your post pointless.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.