Extended full-power in small pistons

Michael Ash writes:

I've been posting on Usenet and other internet forums for a decade and a
half and in all those years I have *never* seen a troll as masterful, as
clever, or as infuriating as MX.

That's because I'm not a troll.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...

That's because I'm not a troll.

And you've never had a blog either.

Both are false statements.

wouldn't it be great if you all would save your breath in answering this
idiot?

Not really, he's a great source of amusement.

Viperdoc schrieb:
wouldn't it be great if you all would save your breath in answering this
idiot?

Not really, he's a great source of amusement.

then move on and take him with you to the appropriate group.

What group would you suggest, since this one no longer involves flying?

Viperdoc wrote:
What group would you suggest, since this one no longer involves flying?


any alt.* group that welcomes trolls and the, er, posters,
that encourage them, just as long as it's not a
rec.aviation. group.

On Jan 4, 6:25Â*am, Martin Hotze wrote:
Beauciphus schrieb:

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
.. .

That's because I'm not a troll.

And you've never had a blog either.

Both are false statements.

wouldn't it be great if you all would save your breath in answering this
idiot?

Mx is famous for his assumptive knowledge. The definition of
assumption follows:


as·sump·tion [ ə súmpshən ] (plural as·sump·tions)

noun
Definition:

1. something taken for granted: something that is believed to be true
without proof

2. belief without proof: the belief that something is true without
having any proof

3. act of undertaking something: the act of taking something upon
yourself

4. acceptance of responsibility for something: the act of taking over
responsibility for something

5. inclination to high expectations: the tendency to expect too much

6. logic unproved starting point: something taken as a starting point
of a logical proof rather than given as a premise

[13th century. Latin assumption- assumpt-, past participle of
assumere (see assume)]

Consider points 1, 2, and 6. Mx assumes he knows everything
already and is therefore unteachable. There's no refuting him, so
there's no point arguing. He's either just trolling for reactions, or
has a complex of some sort. Why do we bother?

Dan