![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 15, 6:23*am, "Anyolmouse" wrote:
Hope you don't mind my jumping in here Bob. Do you remember the Porsche engine with the cooling fan behind the prop? --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- If you mean the engine for the British blimp, yeah, I remember it. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It was supposed to eliminate the need for cowl flaps and also prevent shock cooling too. What happened to it? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- They had trouble with the blimp, as best I can recall. Come on... you should be able to remember it. It was in most of the magazines back then. The blimp could not provide the forward velocity needed to cool the engine, so instead of going to Fat Fins or any of the other possible solutions (the Porsche engine was already Type Certified -- they couldn't mess with it without running into the CAA. So they came up with the idea of providing a 140mph cooling air-flow INSIDE THE COWLING. The engine didn't know any better. It would stick out it's toe, feel that blast of 140 mph cooling air and say, "Oh goody!" (but in Chermann of course) and fly off into the sunset... with half a dozen tourists on-board (at about $50 per, as I recall). Quick tour around the pea-patch, niffty landing to the portable Pylon Tower, commerative T-shirts, coffee mugs and an autographed picture of the Fearless Aviator, and off they go for another trip around the pea patch. Ah, the wonders of aviation... It wasn't the ENGINE'S fault that the thing was not a howling success... and the truth is, I've forgotten the details as to WHY it was not a success... if I ever even knew them. -Bob |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message ... On Jan 15, 6:23 am, "Anyolmouse" wrote: Hope you don't mind my jumping in here Bob. Do you remember the Porsche engine with the cooling fan behind the prop? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------- If you mean the engine for the British blimp, yeah, I remember it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --------------------------- It was supposed to eliminate the need for cowl flaps and also prevent shock cooling too. What happened to it? ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------- They had trouble with the blimp, as best I can recall. Come on... you should be able to remember it. It was in most of the magazines back then. The blimp could not provide the forward velocity needed to cool the engine, so instead of going to Fat Fins or any of the other possible solutions (the Porsche engine was already Type Certified -- they couldn't mess with it without running into the CAA. So they came up with the idea of providing a 140mph cooling air-flow INSIDE THE COWLING. The engine didn't know any better. It would stick out it's toe, feel that blast of 140 mph cooling air and say, "Oh goody!" (but in Chermann of course) and fly off into the sunset... with half a dozen tourists on-board (at about $50 per, as I recall). Quick tour around the pea-patch, niffty landing to the portable Pylon Tower, commerative T-shirts, coffee mugs and an autographed picture of the Fearless Aviator, and off they go for another trip around the pea patch. Ah, the wonders of aviation... It wasn't the ENGINE'S fault that the thing was not a howling success... and the truth is, I've forgotten the details as to WHY it was not a success... if I ever even knew them. -Bob It was in one of the aviation magazines with picture(s) of it in an airplane. Didn't see any reference to a blimp in the write up. I wish I could recall more about it. Thanks for the reply though- -- Anyolmouse |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 15, 10:41*am, " wrote:
It wasn't the ENGINE'S fault that the thing was not a howling success... and the truth is, I've forgotten the details as to WHY it was not a success... if I ever even knew them. History repeats. Only this time the government is paying the bill for a Porsche powered English blimp. http://www.navair.navy.mil/PMA262/bl...0July2008.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skyship_600 =============== Leon McAtee |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Yeah! I'm back online..No thanks to Charley. | CFLav8r | Piloting | 10 | August 24th 04 04:14 AM |
Yeah, I got that one... | Wade Meyers | Military Aviation | 0 | July 1st 03 04:45 AM |