A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dismantle-rebuild a certified aircraft



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 26th 09, 01:04 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Fonz
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 20
Default Dismantle-rebuild a certified aircraft

Well, as someone else pointed out, at least in America, you might have
trouble
with this approach - because you didn't MAKE those parts. They were made
by
a manufacturer who was not making KIT parts, but certified aircraft.



***I can't see where the trouble would be regarding the "- because you
didn't MAKE those parts"
as if you would tear down the entire aircraft and just have a pile of
pre-punched sheets of aluminium, is the same a a kit supplied by a kit
manufacturer. It is identical. In the kit or quickbuild -I didn't make
those parts either.
Rob.







"cavelamb" wrote in message
m...
Fonz wrote:
I find that amazing.
If you totally disassembled the aircraft, cleaned all parts/fittings etc
back to bare aluminium, recoated with zinc-chromate or whatever,
photographed it as evidence, it is basically a kit. It wouldn't even be
a quickbuild, and would come in at over 75% or higher. I can't see how
anyone could challenge it, as the aircraft is constructed by the builder
from parts, for his own education or enjoyment, to a proven design.
Even in Australia, CASA seem to have a mind of their own, making their
own rules, and not being challenged. I believe things are generally OK
so far as the SAAA basically monitor everything. As part of my previous
occupation I was involved in the legal system (I'm not a defence lawyer
by the way, but rather the other side of the fence), and I believe it
would be a very short hearing in the lower court, but winning that battle
doesn't mean you'll win the war. I think I'm starting to answer my own
original question here.
Is there anyone from the SAAA technical side of the fence that would like
to share an opinion? Any annon reply would also be taken in good faith.
Thanks in advance,
Rob.
Melbourne Australia.



Well, as someone else pointed out, at least in America, you might have
trouble
with this approach - because you didn't MAKE those parts. They were made
by
a manufacturer who was not making KIT parts, but certified aircraft.

YMMV in other countries?



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
World's First Certified Electrically Propelled Aircraft? Larry Dighera Piloting 2 September 22nd 06 01:50 AM
Web Seminar: The FAA Has Certified the Adam Aircraft A500 Valerie L Magee Piloting 0 June 1st 05 03:36 PM
Web Seminar: The FAA Has Certified the Adam Aircraft A500 Valerie L Magee General Aviation 0 June 1st 05 03:36 PM
Web Seminar: The FAA Has Certified the Adam Aircraft A500 Valerie L Magee Owning 0 June 1st 05 03:36 PM
Accident Statistics: Certified vs. Non-Certified Engines Ron Wanttaja Home Built 23 January 18th 04 05:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.