![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 18:40 31 January 2009, Bob Kuykendall wrote:
On Jan 28, 6:01=A0pm, DRN wrote: Tooling and engineering for a new glider costs millions... Oops, I forgot to respond to that earlier: Sure, you can spend a million bucks on a program like that if you do nothing but throw money at all of the problems and issues. It's like when your only tool is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail. But, no, it doesn't have to cost "millions" or even the better part of a single million. Thanks, Bob K. Bob, Schleicher may have spent a million on there innovative designs, the ASW24 &27. If you were to condense your 10 year plus program into a 2 years, that would mean 100% of the work has to be funded in a commercial setting to pay for design, labour, shop floor and more. If you have personally invested (a guess) 3000 hr and if you would have charged out at a rate of $ 75.00 per/hr, all costs inclusive, we are now talking real bucks. Adding a new airfoil design could cost tenth of thousand of $ if done commercially. Delft University charges big bucks for there services. Your New HP has proven design elements, including the airfoil, which keeps the cost down. Yours is a big project and I admire your determination. Udo |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
X-Wings and Canard Rotor Wings. | Charles Gray | Rotorcraft | 1 | March 22nd 05 12:26 AM |