![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 30 Jan 2009 22:45:02 GMT, Brian Bange wrote:
Most all were a product of the FAI's initiative to find a World Class ship. I believe one requirement was that they were designed to be easy to fly. In my experience with the Russia, PW5 and L-33, they are. I believe all the FAI is trying to do is include these ships into the World Class and handicap it, so as to grow the class. If something new and more competitive comes along, it will have to live under it's handicap, so where is the advantage to making something that is hard to handle? Well... as there are practiucally no World Class gliders flying in Europe (read: World Class is being ignored by 80 percent of the world's gliding pilots), you'd better name it "US class"... or "dwarf class"... Bye Andreas |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 2, 12:03*pm, Andreas Maurer wrote:
On 30 Jan 2009 22:45:02 GMT, Brian Bange wrote: Most all were a product of the FAI's initiative to find a World Class ship. I believe one requirement was that they were designed to be easy to fly. In my experience with the Russia, PW5 and L-33, they are. I believe all the FAI is trying to do is include these ships into the World Class and handicap it, so as to grow the class. If something new and more competitive comes along, it will have to live under it's handicap, so where is the advantage to making something that is hard to handle? Well... as there are practiucally no World Class gliders flying in Europe (read: World Class is being ignored by 80 percent of the world's gliding pilots), you'd better name it "US class"... or "dwarf class"... Bye Andreas Hey, don't blame it on the US, we are ignoring it too. Todd |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 17:03 02 February 2009, Andreas Maurer wrote:
Well... as there are practiucally no World Class gliders flying in Europe (read: World Class is being ignored by 80 percent of the world's gliding pilots), you'd better name it "US class"... or "dwarf class"... Can't say that it's overwhelmingly popular in the US, either. The World Class US Nationals have been running concurrently with the 1-26 Championships, and it seems like there are 4 to 5 times as many 1-26s as there are PW-5s. Jim Beckman |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 22:45 02 February 2009, Jim Beckman wrote:
At 17:03 02 February 2009, Andreas Maurer wrote: Well... as there are practically no World Class gliders flying in Europe (read: World Class is being ignored by 80 percent of the world's gliding pilots), you'd better name it "US class"... or dwarf class"... Short Wings Gliders might account for 5 pct of world fleet if 20 percent of the world's gliding pilots are interested it will be a great success!!!!! Can't say that it's overwhelmingly popular in the US, either. The World Class US Nationals have been running concurrently with the 1-26 Championships, and it seems like there are 4 to 5 times as many 1-26s as there are PW-5s. it makes sense.......... 1-26 700 built for usa only PW-5 200 built for the world unless Arnold's friend comes around and pull out another Judas trick like he did here in the last supper: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VnTO...eature=related and you get bread, fish and PW-5 multiplied .................. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
X-Wings and Canard Rotor Wings. | Charles Gray | Rotorcraft | 1 | March 22nd 05 12:26 AM |