![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-b- writes:
It's so easy, any monkey can do it. The only humans who are functionally incapable of performing these simple tasks are pilots themselves, because their intelligence is so impaired they cannot even realize they are the least capable of doing their own job . . . It's unwise to lump all pilots together. There are pilots who are too stupid to handle the complexity of a large airliner, of course, but they are a minority. Flying an airliner isn't sufficiently different from flying a small airplane that someone too stupid to handle the former would be likely to be competent in the latter. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The saddest part in all of this is that MX is not even a good simmer.
His responses indicate that he has a poor grasp of how simulation is used in training, and what factors make for good transfer of simulation-learned techniques to the real flight environment. This is particularly disheartening because he claims to be a good reader, yet there are volumes published on the subject. By for the best thing he could do to improve (or at least initiate) the pertinence of his posts would be to take some hours of real flight instruction. Yet he has made his abhorrence of aviation and his disdain for anything real sufficiently clear, that we can be sure he will never do so. Therefore we can rest assured that his posts will be devoid of any significance other than thinly disguised arrogance and disdain for those who have taken the initiative to learn something. This is an extremely retrograde position, and indicative of a very disturbed personality. As for aeronautical considerations - he would do as well to get into long-range weather forecasting. A year or so ahead. He would have as good a chance of hitting on something true as his present blather on operations of aircraft. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-b- writes:
Therefore we can rest assured that his posts will be devoid of any significance other than thinly disguised arrogance and disdain for those who have taken the initiative to learn something. This is an extremely retrograde position, and indicative of a very disturbed personality. So a simmer is unqualified to discuss flying, but a pilot is qualified to diagnose psychological disorders? Explain the seeming contradiction here. As for aeronautical considerations - he would do as well to get into long-range weather forecasting. There are a lot of people predicting the weather 100 years from now who are no more qualified to do so than I am. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
-b- writes:
Didn't catch the contradiction here. . . I didn't expect that you would; had you seen the contradiction, you would not have made the original post. I didn't realize there wer "a lot" of such wizards, but I guess I'm not surprised. Wherever there is grant money, there are "wizards." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message news ![]() -b- writes: Therefore we can rest assured that his posts will be devoid of any significance other than thinly disguised arrogance and disdain for those who have taken the initiative to learn something. This is an extremely retrograde position, and indicative of a very disturbed personality. So a simmer is unqualified to discuss flying, but a pilot is qualified to diagnose psychological disorders? Explain the seeming contradiction here. We all have experience with you. As for aeronautical considerations - he would do as well to get into long-range weather forecasting. There are a lot of people predicting the weather 100 years from now who are no more qualified to do so than I am. That because you are both simply guessing, and both capable of believing anything you imagine. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clark writes:
You've never flown so have no knowledge of flying. I've flown in simulation, which is very close to flying in real life, and I've studied a lot, so I know quite a bit about flying. Everyone who reads your posts is exposed to a psychological disorder. Even if that were true, it would not qualify them to diagnose it. If using a simulator doesn't qualify one to fly for real, then it can only be more true that not having any exposure to psychology would guarantee that a person could not diagnose psychological disorders. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Clark writes: You've never flown so have no knowledge of flying. I've flown in simulation, which is very close to flying in real life, and I've studied a lot, so I know quite a bit about flying. Liar, you have no clue about real life. Everyone who reads your posts is exposed to a psychological disorder. Even if that were true, it would not qualify them to diagnose it. If using a simulator doesn't qualify one to fly for real, then it can only be more true that not having any exposure to psychology would guarantee that a person could not diagnose psychological disorders. That would only make sense to someone with your illness. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clark writes:
You've played a game and claim it's more than that. It's a simulation, not a game. Games have objectives, and prizes, and arbitrary rules. You've never flown but claim to know about it. You don't have to fly to know about it. That's what books are for. No body will believe your claims no matter how many times you repeat them. Some have already believed me, but their minds were less clouded by emotion and more firmly ruled by intellect. Sorry little boy but it's way past time for you to grow up and admit it. See above. As usual, you can't follow an argument so you make up non-sense. The logic is impeccable. Folks deal with your abnormal psychology every time you post here. The abnormality I see is not in me. I'm not sure why, but USENET gives voices to those who would normally remain silently at the bottom of the bell curve. After about ten of your posts just about anyone is qualified to diagnose your problem. If that were true, then, logically, after reading about ten posts here from pilots, I'd be qualified to fly a real airplane. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... -b- writes: It's so easy, any monkey can do it. The only humans who are functionally incapable of performing these simple tasks are pilots themselves, because their intelligence is so impaired they cannot even realize they are the least capable of doing their own job . . . It's unwise to lump all pilots together. There are pilots who are too stupid to handle the complexity of a large airliner, of course, but they are a minority. Flying an airliner isn't sufficiently different from flying a small airplane that someone too stupid to handle the former would be likely to be competent in the latter. Says the moron with "zero" experience with either. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Apology re mxsmanic | terry | Piloting | 96 | February 16th 08 05:17 PM |
Mxsmanic : Your results are in | Mayo Clinic | Piloting | 13 | May 24th 07 02:01 PM |
I saw Mxsmanic on TV | Clear Prop | Piloting | 8 | February 14th 07 01:18 AM |
Mxsmanic | gwengler | Piloting | 30 | January 11th 07 03:42 AM |
Getting rid of MXSMANIC | [email protected] | Piloting | 33 | December 8th 06 11:26 PM |