Sad day for Mxsmanic

Herbert Paulis writes:

But, and that's the actual point, while I was busy keeping the bird on track
the FI who was acompanying the situation did actually push a whole lot of
switches which seemingly were necessary also to land safely. And once I got
her to the ground safely I was actually surprised how difficult it was to
keep her on the RWY during the landing run. Can someone with no or FS
experience only do it safely? From the experience I doubt it ...

Someone with FS experience would at least know what all that "whole lot of
switches" actually does.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Herbert Paulis writes:

But, and that's the actual point, while I was busy keeping the bird on
track
the FI who was acompanying the situation did actually push a whole lot of
switches which seemingly were necessary also to land safely. And once I
got
her to the ground safely I was actually surprised how difficult it was to
keep her on the RWY during the landing run. Can someone with no or FS
experience only do it safely? From the experience I doubt it ...

Someone with FS experience would at least know what all that "whole lot of
switches" actually does.


Bull****. Not even the G1000 in MSX is even close to complete.

Darkwing wrote:
"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Herbert Paulis writes:

But, and that's the actual point, while I was busy keeping the bird on
track
the FI who was acompanying the situation did actually push a whole lot of
switches which seemingly were necessary also to land safely. And once I
got
her to the ground safely I was actually surprised how difficult it was to
keep her on the RWY during the landing run. Can someone with no or FS
experience only do it safely? From the experience I doubt it ...
Someone with FS experience would at least know what all that "whole lot of
switches" actually does.


Bull****. Not even the G1000 in MSX is even close to complete.


Come on. F1 - F12. How many more switches can there be on a A320?
T

"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com writes:

Bull****. Not even the G1000 in MSX is even close to complete.

I'm not sure what MSX is. In MSFS, G1000 simulations vary in accuracy with
the source. The Reality XP simulations of Garmin 430 and 530 units are
complete and accurate, at least. (I don't use a G1000 and I have no interest
in doing so.)

On Feb 28, 7:35*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
"Darkwing" theducksmail"AT"yahoo.com writes:
Bull****. Not even the G1000 in MSX is even close to complete.

I'm not sure what MSX is. *In MSFS, G1000 simulations vary in accuracy with
the source. *The Reality XP simulations of Garmin 430 and 530 units are
complete and accurate, at least. *(I don't use a G1000 and I have no interest
in doing so.)

How do you know that if you haven't used a G1000?

Cheers

Varactor writes:

How do you know that if you haven't used a G1000?

By reading the descriptions of the simulations.

On Feb 28, 3:14*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
Varactor writes:
How do you know that if you haven't used a G1000?

By reading the descriptions of the simulations.

Ohhh sure that's a reliable evaluation. What did they say: "perfect
simulation of the G1000" What was the G1000 pixel resolution and
update rate?

Cheers

On Feb 28, 6:30*am, Varactor wrote:
On Feb 28, 3:14*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:

Varactor writes:
How do you know that if you haven't used a G1000?

By reading the descriptions of the simulations.

Ohhh sure that's a reliable evaluation. What did they say: "perfect
simulation of the G1000" What was the G1000 pixel resolution and
update rate?

Cheers

Has there been instances where arguments of MX v anyone have been
resolved, except in the mind of the person typing the last message?

Do as Obama did during the primaries -- look down on the combantants
and watch the others chase their tails.

Varactor writes:

Ohhh sure that's a reliable evaluation. What did they say: "perfect
simulation of the G1000"

No.