Sad day for Mxsmanic

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...


I do not accept your conjecture as proof.

Likewise.


So to summarize:

I have first hand knowledge of what needs to be done. I contend it cannot be
done, and as evidence, I offer that it has never been done.

You have read about the activity, and contend that it can be done. As
evidence you offer that you have read about the activity and contend that it
can be done.

Mighty compelling argument.

Steve Foley writes:

I have first hand knowledge of what needs to be done.

So do I.

I contend it cannot be done, and as evidence, I offer that
it has never been done.

Lightning cannot strike my house, because it never has.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Steve Foley writes:

I have first hand knowledge of what needs to be done.

So do I.

I contend it cannot be done, and as evidence, I offer that
it has never been done.

Lightning cannot strike my house, because it never has.

Bull****, you have never proven anything but your ability to wonder around
for years in a clueless daze.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Steve Foley writes:

I have first hand knowledge of what needs to be done.

So do I.


You have stated in the past that you did not.


I contend it cannot be done, and as evidence, I offer that
it has never been done.

Lightning cannot strike my house, because it never has.

You're slipping. You forgot to snip the words 'evidence' and 'offer' to my
statement sound as stupid as yours.

Thank you for playing. Please try again.

Steve Foley writes:

You have stated in the past that you did not.

Times change.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Steve Foley writes:

You have stated in the past that you did not.

Times change.

But you haven't.