![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Morgans" wrote in message ... Don't forget that it is still illegal, on some of the frequencies, This has been hashed around here many times in the past, and if memory serves, it is only the original 800 mHz frequencies where it is technically illegal. Are those frequencies even used for the data services? and if the phone companies and fcc decided to prosecute, it would be an easy task. Can anyone name a case where it has happened; especially where it has happened to a casual aviator? Vaughn |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() On 27-Feb-2009, "vaughn" wrote: "Morgans" wrote in message ... Don't forget that it is still illegal, on some of the frequencies, This has been hashed around here many times in the past, and if memory serves, it is only the original 800 mHz frequencies where it is technically illegal. Are those frequencies even used for the data services? and if the phone companies and fcc decided to prosecute, it would be an easy task. Can anyone name a case where it has happened; especially where it has happened to a casual aviator? Vaughn I read into this quite a bit awhile ago, and found that the FCC has proposed lifting the inflight cellphone ban, but they won't do it until the FAA signs off on it. The FAA is still deciding, but all of the negative comments I found on the FCC and FAA websites pertinent to lifting the ban had to do with airlines and aircraft flying in the flightlevels. I could find nothing referencing any concern about using a cellphone inflight at the altitudes my Cessna 172 flies. I found an article written by someone high up in either ARINC or the Aircraft Electronics Association or some such group in which he said he uses his cell phone inflight in his private aircraft regularly with no qualms about it. So what I got out of everything I read is that while technically still illegal, using a cellphone while flying a small aircraft at altitudes lower than the flight levels causes no problems at all and is extremely unlikely to result in any enforcement actions. All of which really doesn't seem to be an issue, I'm pretty darned sure using the Alltell data network to access the internet is not the same as placing a cell phone call. Yes, they use the same towers, but it's still not the same thing. As circumstantial evidence to this, they charge minutes per call, but use of the internet is unrestricted with no limits or per-minute charges, just one monthly charge no matter how much or little you use it. So if I go this route and try using the internet through the Alltell data network, it's my risk and I know that. XM isn't really a consideration for me as I want this service for just one long cross-country each year, when my wife and I fly from Wisconsin to Texas to see my parents. It'd hardly be worth buying a new GPS and signing up for XM for one trip per year. If we sign up for Altell's plan, we'll be using that for our home internet service as well as for the one annual flying trip. I hope that explains my motivations better. Scott Wilson |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote So if I go this route and try using the internet through the Alltell data network, it's my risk and I know that. XM isn't really a consideration for me as I want this service for just one long cross-country each year, when my wife and I fly from Wisconsin to Texas to see my parents. It'd hardly be worth buying a new GPS and signing up for XM for one trip per year. If we sign up for Altell's plan, we'll be using that for our home internet service as well as for the one annual flying trip. I hope that explains my motivations better. Go for it, if you feel so led! ;-) I think you will still find that you will have to go down to 2500 feet, or so, to get any service. If that fits OK, good, it would be handy, I guess. -- Jim in NC |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"v" == vaughn writes:
v This has been hashed around here many times in the past, and v if memory serves, it is only the original 800 mHz frequencies v where it is technically illegal. Correct. While we still call them "cellphones", the FCC calls all the mobile stuff at 1900 MHz "Personal Communications Service" and there are no FCC restrictions on use inflight...if you can get them to work. Like the other posters, I don't have much luck. -- "Cannot possibly attend first night; will attend second, if there is one." -Winston Churchill's response to George Bernard Shaw |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Use of solar cells for inflight recharging | Dave Sinclair | Soaring | 9 | April 19th 06 01:47 AM |
Cellphone weather | Cub Driver | Piloting | 0 | August 4th 04 10:38 AM |
Inflight Emergency -- Definition | Chris OCallaghan | Soaring | 13 | March 2nd 04 07:09 PM |
Inflight IFR Training Glasses on eBay | Cecil E. Chapman | Products | 0 | November 11th 03 05:19 PM |
INFLIGHT IFR Training glasses,,,, anyone try them before | Cecil E. Chapman | Instrument Flight Rules | 0 | October 18th 03 12:24 AM |