Sad day for Mxsmanic

-b- writes:

It's so easy, any monkey can do it. The only humans who are functionally
incapable of performing these simple tasks are pilots themselves, because their
intelligence is so impaired they cannot even realize they are the least capable
of doing their own job . . .

It's unwise to lump all pilots together. There are pilots who are too stupid
to handle the complexity of a large airliner, of course, but they are a
minority. Flying an airliner isn't sufficiently different from flying a small
airplane that someone too stupid to handle the former would be likely to be
competent in the latter.

The saddest part in all of this is that MX is not even a good simmer.
His responses indicate that he has a poor grasp of how simulation is used in
training, and what factors make for good transfer of simulation-learned
techniques to the real flight environment. This is particularly disheartening
because he claims to be a good reader, yet there are volumes published on the
subject.

By for the best thing he could do to improve (or at least initiate) the
pertinence of his posts would be to take some hours of real flight instruction.
Yet he has made his abhorrence of aviation and his disdain for anything real
sufficiently clear, that we can be sure he will never do so.

Therefore we can rest assured that his posts will be devoid of any significance
other than thinly disguised arrogance and disdain for those who have taken the
initiative to learn something. This is an extremely retrograde position, and
indicative of a very disturbed personality.

As for aeronautical considerations - he would do as well to get into long-range
weather forecasting. A year or so ahead. He would have as good a chance of
hitting on something true as his present blather on operations of aircraft.

-b- writes:

Therefore we can rest assured that his posts will be devoid of any significance
other than thinly disguised arrogance and disdain for those who have taken the
initiative to learn something. This is an extremely retrograde position, and
indicative of a very disturbed personality.

So a simmer is unqualified to discuss flying, but a pilot is qualified to
diagnose psychological disorders? Explain the seeming contradiction here.

As for aeronautical considerations - he would do as well to get into long-range
weather forecasting.

There are a lot of people predicting the weather 100 years from now who are no
more qualified to do so than I am.

In article ,
says...


-b- writes:

Therefore we can rest assured that his posts will be devoid of any
significance
other than thinly disguised arrogance and disdain for those who have taken
the
initiative to learn something. This is an extremely retrograde position, and
indicative of a very disturbed personality.

So a simmer is unqualified to discuss flying, but a pilot is qualified to
diagnose psychological disorders? Explain the seeming contradiction here.

Didn't catch the contradiction here. . .


As for aeronautical considerations - he would do as well to get into
long-range
weather forecasting.

There are a lot of people predicting the weather 100 years from now who are no
more qualified to do so than I am.


I didn't realize there wer "a lot" of such wizards, but I guess I'm not
surprised. The point remains that their revelations will have no more and no
less pertinence than your own, purportedly aviation-related posts.

-b- writes:

Didn't catch the contradiction here. . .

I didn't expect that you would; had you seen the contradiction, you would not
have made the original post.

I didn't realize there wer "a lot" of such wizards, but I guess I'm not
surprised.

Wherever there is grant money, there are "wizards."

I was an arrogant son-of-a-bitch before I learned to fly.
That's many years ago now, but I recall watching all those guys and gals in
their 172's thinking I'd be into a KingAir before they even got certificated.
Guess what happened instead - I actually learned something! First thing I
learned was how much I didn't know. You are light-years away from that and
moving at lightspeed toward the dark end. That would be a great new pseudo for
you by the way "LightSpeedToward Darkness". Can we get that enacted right
away?

More on what I learned - the immense satisfaction of mastering the thing -
never master, but every day less and less a slave. Far too humbling a
satisfaction for the likes of you to assimilate. Of course I never came
anywhere near your abyss of pride and ignorance. Perhaps you really are at
lightspeed and there is no recovery possible.

Today I still don't have my KingAir, but I have a 182T and I'm just enthralled
at what a capable airplane it is! I hate to gloat about it, but I'm really
happy not to be in the deep rut you're in. You know you're in deep trouble.
Find professional help.

-b- writes:

I was an arrogant son-of-a-bitch before I learned to fly.

Learning to fly would not necessarily aggravate that characteristic, although
people with such personalities tend to become unsafe pilots.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
news
-b- writes:

Therefore we can rest assured that his posts will be devoid of any
significance
other than thinly disguised arrogance and disdain for those who have
taken the
initiative to learn something. This is an extremely retrograde position,
and
indicative of a very disturbed personality.

So a simmer is unqualified to discuss flying, but a pilot is qualified to
diagnose psychological disorders? Explain the seeming contradiction here.

We all have experience with you.



As for aeronautical considerations - he would do as well to get into
long-range
weather forecasting.

There are a lot of people predicting the weather 100 years from now who
are no
more qualified to do so than I am.

That because you are both simply guessing, and both capable of believing
anything you imagine.

Clark writes:

You've never flown so have no knowledge of flying.

I've flown in simulation, which is very close to flying in real life, and I've
studied a lot, so I know quite a bit about flying.

Everyone who reads your posts is exposed to a psychological
disorder.

Even if that were true, it would not qualify them to diagnose it.

If using a simulator doesn't qualify one to fly for real, then it can only be
more true that not having any exposure to psychology would guarantee that a
person could not diagnose psychological disorders.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Clark writes:

You've never flown so have no knowledge of flying.

I've flown in simulation, which is very close to flying in real life, and
I've
studied a lot, so I know quite a bit about flying.

Liar, you have no clue about real life.


Everyone who reads your posts is exposed to a psychological
disorder.

Even if that were true, it would not qualify them to diagnose it.

If using a simulator doesn't qualify one to fly for real, then it can only
be
more true that not having any exposure to psychology would guarantee that
a
person could not diagnose psychological disorders.

That would only make sense to someone with your illness.