Sad day for Mxsmanic

On Mar 1, 5:53*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
Varactor writes:
Ohhh sure that's a reliable evaluation. What did they say: "perfect
simulation of the G1000"

No.

So its not accurate then is it...

LOL

Varactor writes:

So its not accurate then is it...

No, it's not. Fortunately, I'm not interested in the G1000.

In article ,
says...


Varactor writes:

So its not accurate then is it...

No, it's not. Fortunately, I'm not interested in the G1000.

But G1000 is so generalized that now you can no longer buy a small or
medium plane without it. That's going to leave you without an airplane,
isn't it, Pretty soon you're going to be left on the ground, poor fellow,
because you couldn't keep up with the times!

-b- writes:

But G1000 is so generalized that now you can no longer buy a small or
medium plane without it.

I'll worry about that when I'm in the market for an airplane.

I'm sure that more traditional avionics are available for those willing to pay
for them. I'm not willing to entrust my life to a single unproven ball of
software.

In article ,
says...


-b- writes:

But G1000 is so generalized that now you can no longer buy a small or
medium plane without it.

I'll worry about that when I'm in the market for an airplane.

I'm sure that more traditional avionics are available for those willing to pay
for them. I'm not willing to entrust my life to a single unproven ball of
software.


Well, you could at least take a chance - because as soon as you quit the
application you get your life back! But I guess that's not getting much back,
is it?

Technical question : What part of G1000 is unproven, and where's the "ball"?

-b- writes:

Well, you could at least take a chance - because as soon as you quit the
application you get your life back!

Since I wouldn't trust it in real life, I don't trust it in simulation.

Technical question : What part of G1000 is unproven, and where's the "ball"?

All of it, unfortunately.

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
-b- writes:

Well, you could at least take a chance - because as soon as you quit
the
application you get your life back!

Since I wouldn't trust it in real life, I don't trust it in simulation.

Technical question : What part of G1000 is unproven, and where's the
"ball"?

All of it, unfortunately.

Why would you care, all you ever fly is your desk.

On Mar 2, 11:51*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
-b- writes:
But G1000 is so generalized that now you can no longer buy a small or
medium plane without it.

I'll worry about that when I'm in the market for an airplane.


SPOLRK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

LOL