![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 1, 2:26*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
Mike Ash writes: Never, ever said it was. All I ever said was that there is a time limit.. There's always a time limit. *But it will typically be extremely generous compared to the time required to find a qualified instructor. They need to be in a position where they can be found and called in, with enough time left over to find an identical airplane (or equivalent simulator) and talk the guy down. Unless they live at the North Pole, it shouldn't take too long. I'm not saying it can't be done. But it is a challenge and it has not been demonstrated that it can be reliably overcome. Just getting a large number of airplanes to land safely in poor weather conditions is a substantial challenge, but air traffic controllers meet that challenge daily. *The mere fact that it might seem insurmountably difficult to you doesn't mean that it would be difficult for others. I've never said that it's impossible, merely that it has not been demonstrated to be possible ... Since it has not been demonstrated, asserting that it is difficult has no greater empirical basis than asserting that it is easy, at best. ... and the gleeful self-assurance demonstrated by both yourself and the author of the article in question are therefore not backed up by reality. Neither is it invalidated by reality. MX wrote Just getting a large number of airplanes to land safely in poor weather conditions is a substantial challenge, but air traffic controllers meet that challenge daily. The mere fact that it might seem insurmountably difficult to you doesn't mean that it would be difficult for others. I would point out controllers get a large number of airplanes to land safely. All they do is provide seperation so the pilots can land the airplanes safely. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
a writes:
I would point out controllers get a large number of airplanes to land safely. All they do is provide seperation so the pilots can land the airplanes safely. Before they did that, some pilots never got the opportunity to land. Seventy years ago, just flying into clouds could spell the end of a commercial flight. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Anyway, we have to admit it is possible to do.
I've personally seen it done. Karen Black did it in 1975. In a 747 no less. You just talk on the radio, and the guy tells you what buttons to press. When it comes time to land, this guy jumps out of a heliciopter and climbs in the cockpit to land the plane. And that, as MX explains, is "as real as it gets". . . |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 1, 5:25*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
a writes: I would point out controllers get a large number of airplanes to land safely. All they do is *provide seperation so the pilots can land the airplanes safely. Before they did that, some pilots never got the opportunity to land. Seventy years ago, just flying into clouds could spell the end of a commercial flight. What part of "so pilots can land the planes safely" did you not understand? Reading comprehension problems too? You'd be an interesting case study for one of my undergrad students who is trying to find her way through the DSM. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 1, 11:25*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
a writes: I would point out controllers get a large number of airplanes to land safely. All they do is *provide seperation so the pilots can land the airplanes safely. Not Before they did that, some pilots never got the opportunity to land. Seventy years ago, just flying into clouds could spell the end of a commercial flight. The no visual reverence problem was solved by Sperry eighty years ago. Cheers |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Varactor writes:
The no visual reverence problem was solved by Sperry eighty years ago. Then why do pilots still crash regularly after entering IMC? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mxsmanic" wrote in message ... Varactor writes: The no visual reverence problem was solved by Sperry eighty years ago. Then why do pilots still crash regularly after entering IMC? They don't, dumb ass, that's a rare occurrence. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 2, 11:50*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
Varactor writes: The no visual reverence problem was solved by Sperry eighty years ago. Then why do pilots still crash regularly after entering IMC? You think they do when IR? But your observation is a non-sequiteur and largely sophist. Cheers |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Varactor writes:
You think they do when IR? No, I think they do when they are not instrument-rated. Most private pilots do not have an IR. The point being, of course, that inadequate familiarity and practice with instrument procedures, and/or inadequate equipment on board the aircraft, can lead to problems. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mxsmanic wrote:
Varactor writes: You think they do when IR? No, I think they do when they are not instrument-rated. Most private pilots do not have an IR. The point being, of course, that inadequate familiarity and practice with instrument procedures, and/or inadequate equipment on board the aircraft, can lead to problems. No, your point was to attempt to take a shot at the real pilots you hate so much. -- Jim Pennino Remove .spam.sux to reply. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Apology re mxsmanic | terry | Piloting | 96 | February 16th 08 05:17 PM |
Mxsmanic : Your results are in | Mayo Clinic | Piloting | 13 | May 24th 07 02:01 PM |
I saw Mxsmanic on TV | Clear Prop | Piloting | 8 | February 14th 07 01:18 AM |
Mxsmanic | gwengler | Piloting | 30 | January 11th 07 03:42 AM |
Getting rid of MXSMANIC | [email protected] | Piloting | 33 | December 8th 06 11:26 PM |