A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Piloting
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Sad day for Mxsmanic



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 1st 09, 10:10 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
a[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 562
Default Sad day for Mxsmanic

On Mar 1, 2:26*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
Mike Ash writes:
Never, ever said it was. All I ever said was that there is a time limit..


There's always a time limit. *But it will typically be extremely generous
compared to the time required to find a qualified instructor.

They need to be in a position where they can be found and called in,
with enough time left over to find an identical airplane (or equivalent
simulator) and talk the guy down.


Unless they live at the North Pole, it shouldn't take too long.

I'm not saying it can't be done. But it is a challenge and it has not
been demonstrated that it can be reliably overcome.


Just getting a large number of airplanes to land safely in poor weather
conditions is a substantial challenge, but air traffic controllers meet that
challenge daily. *The mere fact that it might seem insurmountably difficult to
you doesn't mean that it would be difficult for others.

I've never said that it's impossible, merely that it has not been
demonstrated to be possible ...


Since it has not been demonstrated, asserting that it is difficult has no
greater empirical basis than asserting that it is easy, at best.

... and the gleeful self-assurance demonstrated by both yourself
and the author of the article in question are therefore not backed up by
reality.


Neither is it invalidated by reality.


MX wrote


Just getting a large number of airplanes to land safely in poor weather
conditions is a substantial challenge, but air traffic controllers meet that
challenge daily. The mere fact that it might seem insurmountably difficult to
you doesn't mean that it would be difficult for others.

I would point out controllers get a large number of airplanes to land
safely. All they do is provide seperation so the pilots can land the
airplanes safely.
  #2  
Old March 1st 09, 10:25 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Sad day for Mxsmanic

a writes:

I would point out controllers get a large number of airplanes to land
safely. All they do is provide seperation so the pilots can land the
airplanes safely.


Before they did that, some pilots never got the opportunity to land.

Seventy years ago, just flying into clouds could spell the end of a commercial
flight.
  #3  
Old March 1st 09, 10:05 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
-b-
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 60
Default Sad day for Mxsmanic

Anyway, we have to admit it is possible to do.
I've personally seen it done. Karen Black did it in 1975. In a 747 no less.
You just talk on the radio, and the guy tells you what buttons to press.
When it comes time to land, this guy jumps out of a heliciopter and climbs in
the cockpit to land the plane.

And that, as MX explains, is "as real as it gets". . .

  #4  
Old March 1st 09, 02:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
a[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 562
Default Sad day for Mxsmanic

On Mar 1, 5:25*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
a writes:
I would point out controllers get a large number of airplanes to land
safely. All they do is *provide seperation so the pilots can land the
airplanes safely.


Before they did that, some pilots never got the opportunity to land.

Seventy years ago, just flying into clouds could spell the end of a commercial
flight.


What part of "so pilots can land the planes safely" did you not
understand? Reading comprehension problems too? You'd be an
interesting case study for one of my undergrad students who is trying
to find her way through the DSM.
  #5  
Old March 1st 09, 07:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Varactor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default Sad day for Mxsmanic

On Mar 1, 11:25*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
a writes:
I would point out controllers get a large number of airplanes to land
safely. All they do is *provide seperation so the pilots can land the
airplanes safely.

Not
Before they did that, some pilots never got the opportunity to land.

Seventy years ago, just flying into clouds could spell the end of a commercial
flight.


The no visual reverence problem was solved by Sperry eighty years ago.

Cheers

  #6  
Old March 1st 09, 10:50 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Sad day for Mxsmanic

Varactor writes:

The no visual reverence problem was solved by Sperry eighty years ago.


Then why do pilots still crash regularly after entering IMC?
  #7  
Old March 2nd 09, 01:41 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Maxwell[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,043
Default Sad day for Mxsmanic


"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Varactor writes:

The no visual reverence problem was solved by Sperry eighty years ago.


Then why do pilots still crash regularly after entering IMC?


They don't, dumb ass, that's a rare occurrence.


  #8  
Old March 3rd 09, 08:17 AM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Varactor
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 14
Default Sad day for Mxsmanic

On Mar 2, 11:50*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
Varactor writes:
The no visual reverence problem was solved by Sperry eighty years ago.


Then why do pilots still crash regularly after entering IMC?


You think they do when IR? But your observation is a non-sequiteur and
largely sophist.

Cheers
  #9  
Old March 3rd 09, 01:48 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
Mxsmanic
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9,169
Default Sad day for Mxsmanic

Varactor writes:

You think they do when IR?


No, I think they do when they are not instrument-rated. Most private pilots
do not have an IR.

The point being, of course, that inadequate familiarity and practice with
instrument procedures, and/or inadequate equipment on board the aircraft, can
lead to problems.
  #10  
Old March 3rd 09, 05:00 PM posted to rec.aviation.piloting
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,892
Default Sad day for Mxsmanic

Mxsmanic wrote:
Varactor writes:

You think they do when IR?


No, I think they do when they are not instrument-rated. Most private pilots
do not have an IR.

The point being, of course, that inadequate familiarity and practice with
instrument procedures, and/or inadequate equipment on board the aircraft, can
lead to problems.


No, your point was to attempt to take a shot at the real pilots you hate
so much.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apology re mxsmanic terry Piloting 96 February 16th 08 05:17 PM
Mxsmanic : Your results are in Mayo Clinic Piloting 13 May 24th 07 02:01 PM
I saw Mxsmanic on TV Clear Prop Piloting 8 February 14th 07 01:18 AM
Mxsmanic gwengler Piloting 30 January 11th 07 03:42 AM
Getting rid of MXSMANIC [email protected] Piloting 33 December 8th 06 11:26 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.