Sad day for Mxsmanic

On Mar 1, 11:25*pm, Mxsmanic wrote:
a writes:
I would point out controllers get a large number of airplanes to land
safely. All they do is *provide seperation so the pilots can land the
airplanes safely.
Not
Before they did that, some pilots never got the opportunity to land.

Seventy years ago, just flying into clouds could spell the end of a commercial
flight.

The no visual reverence problem was solved by Sperry eighty years ago.

Cheers

Varactor writes:

The no visual reverence problem was solved by Sperry eighty years ago.

Then why do pilots still crash regularly after entering IMC?

"Mxsmanic" wrote in message
...
Varactor writes:

The no visual reverence problem was solved by Sperry eighty years ago.

Then why do pilots still crash regularly after entering IMC?

They don't, dumb ass, that's a rare occurrence.

On Mar 2, 11:50*am, Mxsmanic wrote:
Varactor writes:
The no visual reverence problem was solved by Sperry eighty years ago.

Then why do pilots still crash regularly after entering IMC?

You think they do when IR? But your observation is a non-sequiteur and
largely sophist.

Cheers

Varactor writes:

You think they do when IR?

No, I think they do when they are not instrument-rated. Most private pilots
do not have an IR.

The point being, of course, that inadequate familiarity and practice with
instrument procedures, and/or inadequate equipment on board the aircraft, can
lead to problems.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Varactor writes:

You think they do when IR?

No, I think they do when they are not instrument-rated. Most private pilots
do not have an IR.

The point being, of course, that inadequate familiarity and practice with
instrument procedures, and/or inadequate equipment on board the aircraft, can
lead to problems.

No, your point was to attempt to take a shot at the real pilots you hate
so much.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.