Sad day for Mxsmanic

In article ,
says...


VOR-DME writes:

Why do you talk to pilots?

I'm interested in aviation.

I thought that was a waste of time. . .

Not if they are good pilots.

What chance do I have of making your list of "good pilots"?
(Please answer something like "not much" just to show the entire world
how far down the toilet is your head).

In article ,
says...


Varactor writes:

So its not accurate then is it...

No, it's not. Fortunately, I'm not interested in the G1000.

But G1000 is so generalized that now you can no longer buy a small or
medium plane without it. That's going to leave you without an airplane,
isn't it, Pretty soon you're going to be left on the ground, poor fellow,
because you couldn't keep up with the times!

writes:

Wrong, the FAR's define what constitutes a simulator ...

The FARs only define simulation for the purpose of logging hours thereon. I
don't think the builders or car or ship simulators, or even the builders of
most flight simulators, really care about what the FAA says.

Clark writes:

And in the past you have stated that you have objectives, arbitrary rules,
and prizes for your use of MSFS.

My use and the design of the program are two different things, although I
don't recall any prizes.

It's a game and you have already admitted it. Why deny it?

It's a simulator. Why deny it?

Horse****. You can learn about concepts in books, boy. You learn about
flying by doing it.

You can learn about flying either way. Some people are good at understanding
things when they are shown them in person and their hands are held, but are
poor at reading and understanding things on their own. I can use either
method, however.

Horse**** again boy. You can repeat you claims all you want but they will
nver be true.

Then that must also be true for your claims. If you believe it is not,
explain why.

Mxsmanic wrote:
writes:

Wrong, the FAR's define what constitutes a simulator ...

The FARs only define simulation for the purpose of logging hours thereon. I
don't think the builders or car or ship simulators, or even the builders of
most flight simulators, really care about what the FAA says.

Bunch of off topic nonsense.

The topic was truth in advertising and calling a flying game a flight
simulator.

Since flight, and only flight, simulators have a legal definition, calling
something a flight simulator that is not is false advertising.

All the flight simulator game sellers are quite explicit in saying what
they are selling is a game.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Mxsmanic wrote:
Clark writes:

And in the past you have stated that you have objectives, arbitrary rules,
and prizes for your use of MSFS.

My use and the design of the program are two different things, although I
don't recall any prizes.

It's a game and you have already admitted it. Why deny it?

It's a simulator. Why deny it?

Flight simulators have a legal definition under 14CFR.

MSFS doesn't qualify as a flight simulator which is why it is explicitly
called a flight simulation GAME by its maker.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

In article ,
says...

If you're so keenly interested in aviation, take some flight
lessons, for God's sake.

That isn't practical at the moment.

Is there something you haven't told us?
Are you confined to a hospital bed or something?
You know, plenty of people with disabilities still learn to fly.
There are plenty of paraplegics, and some quadriplegics who fly, each with
respect to their own disabilities. There are even blind pilots' flying
associations.

To date I am not aware of any paranoid schizophrenics' piloting associations,
but hey, where there's a will . . .

In article ,
says...


-b- writes:

Says Who?

Say my instructors.

Instructors of what?
Bull**** and advanced mental illness?



But you have never had any training of this kind!

Well, yes, I have.

No you have not.
You just told us this is "not practical" at the moment.
Five minutes of memory getting to you?

Your mind is going, Dave. . .
You can feel it, Dave. . .

Sing the "Daisy" song, MX. . .

In article ,
says...


-b- writes:

Is there something you haven't told us?
Are you confined to a hospital bed or something?
You know, plenty of people with disabilities still learn to fly.
There are plenty of paraplegics, and some quadriplegics who fly, each with
respect to their own disabilities. There are even blind pilots' flying
associations.

I don't recall mentioning any disabilities.


You don't recall much, do you?
Oh by the way - why did you dutifully reproduce the preceding text, but wipe
out the part about schizophrenia? Mental illness is not a subject you like to
talk about, is it?

In article ,
says...


VOR-DME writes:

What chance do I have of making your list of "good pilots"?

I don't know anything about you, but what little I've seen in your posts does
not flatter you.


I hear flushing sounds . . .