Sad day for Mxsmanic

On Mar 2, 3:54*am, -b- wrote:
In article ,
says...



In article ,
-b- wrote:

Oh by the way - why did you dutifully reproduce the preceding text, but wipe
out the part about schizophrenia?

It's a classic MX trolling tactic. He is a master of selectively quoting
people, and then responding only to what's quoted to steer the
conversation in his preferred direction. If you stated that the Earth is
round in a debate with him, he would snip out just enough to make it
look like you were an idiot, and then make a reply that, at least
superficially, makes him look like the only one who knows anything.

I completely disagree. You give him far too much credit.
I don't think he's a master of much, and I don't think his intellectual
dishonesty fools much of anyone. You make it sound like he's sly and
resourceful - I see him as slow, dumb and cumbersome. Getting the better of him
intellectually is extremely easy, and his lame attempts at recovery are
transparent to all. He rarely makes a successful rejoinder to any challenge,
and contradicts himself repeatedly. I cannot recall any instance in which he
has made anyone other than himself look like an idiot.





--
Mike Ash
Radio Free Earth
Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

With respect, I'd urge you to not underestimate MX. I have not tested
him, but judging from the level of his responses I'd judge a
conventional IQ test would find him in the 125 area. That is not to
say his social skills or human interaction skills are advanced -- they
are not.

In article ,
says...


With respect, I'd urge you to not underestimate MX. I have not tested
him, but judging from the level of his responses I'd judge a
conventional IQ test would find him in the 125 area. That is not to
say his social skills or human interaction skills are advanced -- they
are not.


125's not much. . .
Certainly far from sufficient to substantiate the profile he's trying to cut
here. He's out of his depth and running naked.

Quite a few contributors here who can better that score and better him - and
do, regularly, while making tuna salad in the background.

On Mar 2, 5:07*am, -b- wrote:
In article ,
says...



With respect, I'd urge you to not underestimate MX. I have not tested
him, but judging from the level of his responses I'd judge a
conventional IQ test would find him in the 125 area. That is not to
say his social skills or human interaction skills are advanced -- they
are not.

125's not much. . .
Certainly far from sufficient to substantiate the profile he's trying to cut
here. He's out of his depth and running naked.

Quite a few contributors here who can better that score and better him - and
do, regularly, while making tuna salad in the background.

I'm well aware of that. Never the less, mischaracterizing him
diminishes the person doing that. He may be a standard deviation or
more to the good side of normal in IQ, but far to the other side in
other important social characteristics.

That's just my opinion, of course, but I do have some training and
professional experience in that area.



to his level.

In article ,
says...


Quite a few contributors here who can better that score and better him - and
do, regularly, while making tuna salad in the background.

I'm well aware of that. Never the less, mischaracterizing him
diminishes the person doing that.


You're beginning to sound like him.
Unravel his twisted argument to reveal its fallacies, and it reflects badly on
yourself. Are we talking Kharma here?!

His intention is to feign superiority, yet his intellect is insufficient to
attain it. Deer in the headlights.

I'm not mischaracterizing him in the least by saying he's just not quite as
smart as he thinks, and rather less than some others here. He's used to
walking into situations in which he's more articulate than others - this time
he blew it. Everyone has to meet their match.

In article ,
says...


On Mar 2, 5:07*am, -b- wrote:
In article
,
says...



With respect, I'd urge you to not underestimate MX. I have not tested
him, but judging from the level of his responses I'd judge a
conventional IQ test would find him in the 125 area. That is not to
say his social skills or human interaction skills are advanced -- they
are not.

125's not much. . .
Certainly far from sufficient to substantiate the profile he's trying to cut
here. He's out of his depth and running naked.

Quite a few contributors here who can better that score and better him - and
do, regularly, while making tuna salad in the background.

I'm well aware of that. Never the less, mischaracterizing him
diminishes the person doing that. He may be a standard deviation or
more to the good side of normal in IQ, but far to the other side in
other important social characteristics.

That's just my opinion, of course, but I do have some training and
professional experience in that area.



Since you're a professional - I have a close family member who is a severe
Asperger's case, with a significant touch of dissociation, just like MX. His
conventional IQ has been measured at over 160. He's able to bull**** his way
through almost everything, with a tone strikingly similar to MX's. It's the
"almost" that hurts, though. He's in jail now - ran out of bull**** and reality
hit like a brick wall at mach 2. That's where MX is headed. He's out of his
depth here, and since his intentions are disingenuous no one is going to have
any pity for him.