![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ibby" wrote in message ... -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Really, and how was your landing? I wasn't allowed to land on my first lesson and I would doubt anyone is but I'm sure your hoping to compare my first lesson to how I, or a complete novice with zero aircraft experience, would land a commercial airliner. Landing a small Cessna 152 (with NO AUTOPILOT) requires manual control of pitch and throttle to retain the required descent rate and localiser following. Landing an airliner can all be done via the Autoland system with the press of a few buttons. It doesn't have to be done manually, you do NOT have to control the yoke or touch the thrust levers until on the ground. MOST real life landings are done with this method with the pilot perhaps only disconnecting the autopilot and autothrottle systems a few hundred feet above ground level when the aircraft is already established and configured for the descent path i.e. descent rate, airspeed and lateral position. His hands will of course remain on the control column and thrust levels in case he needs to press the TOGA button on the thrust lever in case of a Go-Around etc. If a novice or even a PPL pilot had to hand fly an airliner and land it yes it would more than likely result in disaster but less likely with the highly technical automation systems available today in the Next Generation Boeings. Ibby Oh brother, Mx Jr. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Oh brother, Mx Jr.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - God man grow up. What do you think the point of an autopilot, autolanding and autothrottle systems are for?? To make control of an airliner easier for the flightcrew whether it an Airbus, Boeing and MD and even a Cirus, Pipers etc. As a Cessna 152 has NONE of these systems they have to be flown by hand and landed by hand. An airliner does NOT HAVE to be hand flown - in REAL LIFE and RARELY is. Read some books, watch some videos and wise up you lot. I was DEFENDING the skill required in hand flying a light aircraft but it just seems to literally 'fly' over a lot of heads here in your blindness for what you are reading. There is nothing wrong with my previous post. I know what is required in a real aircraft to control airspeed, attitude, descents and climbs because I HAVE bloody flown a REAL aircraft but in the UK you are not permitted to land or take off on your first lesson which I was commenting on. Ibby |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
*It doesn't have
to be done manually, you do NOT have to control the yoke or touch the thrust levers until on the ground. *MOST real life landings are done with this method ??? Most? Certainly not. -- Duncan Duncan So do YOU believe a pilot of a 737 or 747 hand flys an entire STAR approach, captures the ILS localiser and glideslope, whilst keeping critical control of his altitude and reducing airspeed and deployment of flaps ALL by hand. Commercial pilots use the autopilot's approach system at the very LEAST to get established on the localiser and control the descent on the glideslope whilst they manually reduce the desired speed (still under the autopilots autohrottle control) on the Mode Control Panel Watch this video of the final stages of a 747-400 approach and landing into San Fransisco. This is a typical landing. The pilot disconnected the autopilot at a few hundred feet but this aircraft and runway 28L could have enabled him to perform a full autoland. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5ShBOtPiuNM As you can clearly witness the majority of the input required by the pilot to maintain flight, approach and landing is via the MCP on the glareshield Ibby Ibby |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Apology re mxsmanic | terry | Piloting | 96 | February 16th 08 05:17 PM |
Mxsmanic : Your results are in | Mayo Clinic | Piloting | 13 | May 24th 07 02:01 PM |
I saw Mxsmanic on TV | Clear Prop | Piloting | 8 | February 14th 07 01:18 AM |
Mxsmanic | gwengler | Piloting | 30 | January 11th 07 03:42 AM |
Getting rid of MXSMANIC | [email protected] | Piloting | 33 | December 8th 06 11:26 PM |