F35 cost goes up.

Chad Irby wrote:

:In article ,
: Fred J. McCall wrote:
:
: I still want to know which part of LockMart marketing you work for,
: by the way.
:
:Funny - I was wondering which F-18 system subcontractor you worked for.

None of them. I do strike weapons for a living (although another part
of my company does radars, which do end up on various airplanes,
including both the F/A-18 and the F-35). Obviously, I speak only for
me and not for the company. Any time you want to talk about
shortcomings of the F/A-18, feel free. I have no doubt you'll be
surprised when I agree with the many valid critiques of THAT aircraft.

Now, would you care to answer the question about YOUR affiliations,
since you seem to be a 'one trick pony' with regard to the F-35?

--
"Nekubi o kaite was ikenai"
["It does not do to slit the throat of a sleeping man."]
-- Admiral Yamamoto

In article ,
Fred J. McCall wrote:

Now, would you care to answer the question about YOUR affiliations,
since you seem to be a 'one trick pony' with regard to the F-35?

I don't work for any defense contractor, I have no financial interest in
the F-35 or any other military aircraft, and if you think I'm only
interested in the F-35, you need to get out of sci.military.naval for a
while, since the only reason you're seeing my posts seems to be the
crossposting on this and other threads.

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.

Chad Irby wrote:

:In article ,
: Fred J. McCall wrote:
:
: Now, would you care to answer the question about YOUR affiliations,
: since you seem to be a 'one trick pony' with regard to the F-35?
:
:I don't work for any defense contractor, I have no financial interest in
:the F-35 or any other military aircraft, and if you think I'm only
:interested in the F-35, you need to get out of sci.military.naval for a
:while, since the only reason you're seeing my posts seems to be the
:crossposting on this and other threads.

It wasn't your 'interest' in the F-35 that makes you look like a 'one
trick pony'; it's your impassioned "all is wonderful" approach to it.
And I'm not the first to remark on that, either.

In article ,
Fred J. McCall wrote:

It wasn't your 'interest' in the F-35 that makes you look like a 'one
trick pony'; it's your impassioned "all is wonderful" approach to it.
And I'm not the first to remark on that, either.

Yes, you have agreement from *Tarver*.

And if you don't know what that means...

--
cirby at cfl.rr.com

Remember: Objects in rearview mirror may be hallucinations.
Slam on brakes accordingly.

Chad Irby wrote:

:In article ,
: Fred J. McCall wrote:
:
: It wasn't your 'interest' in the F-35 that makes you look like a 'one
: trick pony'; it's your impassioned "all is wonderful" approach to it.
: And I'm not the first to remark on that, either.
:
:Yes, you have agreement from *Tarver*.
:
:And if you don't know what that means...

I'm sure Mary appreciates that, since you also seem to have gotten
somewhat nasty in disagreement with her.

And if YOU don't know what THAT means....

--
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to
live in the real world." -- Mary Shafer, NASA Dryden