![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As TUNO's awesome analysis document shows, the ability of the device
to transmit is very much dependent on placement and view of the sky and with the current satellites in view. High up on the shoulder straps, or even placement elsewhere in the cockpit with a good view seems best. Down low on your shoulder straps or in the side pocket is not such a good place. Yesterday and the day before, the posits seemed to be pretty consistent across the board. Today, a bit spottier. It is what it is. It's still fun to watch though. :-) -Mark Okay, so assuming that the site is working more-or-less correctly, then it appears that the reliability of the SPOT fixes is a bit suspect, no? * Out of the dozen or so pilots flying with SPOT, it seems as if about half of them were not transmitting for fairly long periods of time or "dropped off" entirely. * Maybe I'm missing the details of how SPOT works, but I thought it was supposed to be "fire and forget" - turn it on and it broadcasts your position at defined intervals. * Of course, it could just be that my ignorance is showing... P3 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Correction, Mark: the SPOT analysis is Steve Koerner's. He's too
modest to point people to it, and it's too good of an analysis not to share. I've been slightly dismayed with the missed reports problem, but I remain a big fan of SPOT just for its utility in emergency situations and landouts. Regardless of the whether you have a routine landout or a serious mishap, the messenger tells your crew exactly where you are with the "Ok" message, and whether you need more urgent help via the "911" message. My crew is VERY happy that I fly with one, and she watches my shared SPOT page when I fly. 2NO |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I'd say the phrase "Location, Location, Location" certainly applies
here. If you stick it somewhere that it can't see the sky, then it's not going to be able to transmit the position. If it can, it does. So if you happen to be stuck low trying to dig your way out (regular for me), it's very possible that even with the best location for a horizontal glider, that it not be as good a position for a 45 degree+ glider. :-) As TUNO said though, if I do land out, makes it VERY easy to let people know where I am and if I'm ok or, god forbid, NOT!! Later! -Mark On Mar 9, 4:32*pm, Tuno wrote: Correction, Mark: the SPOT analysis is Steve Koerner's. He's too modest to point people to it, and it's too good of an analysis not to share. I've been slightly dismayed with the missed reports problem, but I remain a big fan of SPOT just for its utility in emergency situations and landouts. Regardless of the whether you have a routine landout or a serious mishap, the messenger tells your crew exactly where you are with the "Ok" message, and whether you need more urgent help via the "911" message. My crew is VERY happy that I fly with one, and she watches my shared SPOT page when I fly. 2NO |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 9, 6:49*pm, MarkHawke7 wrote:
I'd say the phrase "Location, Location, Location" certainly applies here. *If you stick it somewhere that it can't see the sky, then it's not going to be able to transmit the position. *If it can, it does. So if you happen to be stuck low trying to dig your way out (regular for me), it's very possible that even with the best location for a horizontal glider, that it not be as good a position for a 45 degree+ glider. *:-) As TUNO said though, if I do land out, makes it VERY easy to let people know where I am and if I'm ok or, god forbid, NOT!! Later! -Mark On Mar 9, 4:32*pm, Tuno wrote: Correction, Mark: the SPOT analysis is Steve Koerner's. He's too modest to point people to it, and it's too good of an analysis not to share. I've been slightly dismayed with the missed reports problem, but I remain a big fan of SPOT just for its utility in emergency situations and landouts. Regardless of the whether you have a routine landout or a serious mishap, the messenger tells your crew exactly where you are with the "Ok" message, and whether you need more urgent help via the "911" message. My crew is VERY happy that I fly with one, and she watches my shared SPOT page when I fly. 2NO- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - As an update to the issue of SPOT tracking message performance, I have been the 'on-site organizer' for SPOT-equipped pilots here at the Seniors, and I have found that pilots need to be reminded to place their units where they can see the sky. A typical response to my question about where the unit was installed was "I just put it in a side pocket". Another problem was that new SPOT users weren't familiar with the somewhat clunky procedure for getting SPOT into 'track' mode, and were simply hitting the OK button every so often. If you are looking at the Seniors experience as a measure of anticipated performance for other contests, you should look at the track history for TA (my ship). I have my SPOT unit attached to my harness in such a way that it is almost horizontal when the glider is flying straigth & level, and it is well above the canopy rails for good sky visiblity. I believe Mark told me that he was seeing about 90-95% success rate for tracking messages over several days of flying. As we all become more familiar with SPOT units and their idiosyncracies, I believe overall tracking performance will slowly approach the 90-95% level that I have been getting. Frank (TA) |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
One other minor suggestion irregardless of whether we're talking about
the tracking stuff we're doing or if it's just a wife/significant other/etc watching your normal SPOT shared page. Try to leave the unit on after you land back at the airfield for 15-30 mins where it can send another position or two showing that you did make it back home. That's been a tough one to get people to do as well. Just a suggestion. -Mark |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Related to this topic, I've been able to enhance my application so
that it can now output KML quite nicely. I put together a small kml file that contains network links for showing the SPOT trackers, current task and the other turnpoints. This file can be opened by Google Earth for viewing. Google Earth is by far the best depiction of this information as I'm able to rotate the airplane symbols to show the general direction of travel of each participant. John Leibacher has graciously agree to host the kml file to allow for easy access. The link to it is: http://soaringweb.org/TP/Seminole/se...acking_map.kml For those whose computers just aren't quite up to the task of running Google Earth. The original page is still available at: http://www.soaringpilot.org/snspotmap.htm The only thing it doesn't show is the rotated icons. Enjoy!! -Mark |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark - Thanks but....I couldn't get it to work with IE 6 (yeah, I
know). I just get a page showing raw HTML code. It does work with FireFox 3, Safari 3.2.2 and Chrome 1. FYI and hope you can fix the issue with IE 6 as there is alot of installed base. My $0.02. Thanks again. PS - The direct link imbedded in the XML works fine; http://maps.google.com/maps/ms?ie=UT...p; output=kml - John |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi Mark,
I'm looking forward to trying it in Google Earth. I just upgraded to the latest version of Google Earth today, but I can't seem to get the link below to work. It simply opens a text file in my browser window. I tried saving the text into a text file with a .kml extension and double-clicking on it. Google Earth tries to open it, but it gives an error as follows: Google Earth Error Open of file seniors.kml failed: Parse error at line 1, column 2: XML or text declaration not at start of entity. I imagine I'm doing something wrong. Any suggestions? Thanks, Paul Remde "MarkHawke7" wrote in message ... Related to this topic, I've been able to enhance my application so that it can now output KML quite nicely. I put together a small kml file that contains network links for showing the SPOT trackers, current task and the other turnpoints. This file can be opened by Google Earth for viewing. Google Earth is by far the best depiction of this information as I'm able to rotate the airplane symbols to show the general direction of travel of each participant. John Leibacher has graciously agree to host the kml file to allow for easy access. The link to it is: http://soaringweb.org/TP/Seminole/se...acking_map.kml For those whose computers just aren't quite up to the task of running Google Earth. The original page is still available at: http://www.soaringpilot.org/snspotmap.htm The only thing it doesn't show is the rotated icons. Enjoy!! -Mark |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SPOT tracking test at 2009 Seniors | Frank[_1_] | Soaring | 0 | February 22nd 09 03:24 AM |
SPOT tracking for 2009 contests? | Frank[_1_] | Soaring | 24 | February 15th 09 05:21 AM |
Spot tracking consistency | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 3 | June 24th 08 10:25 PM |
SPOT - 6 months free tracking | 5Z | Soaring | 1 | May 29th 08 04:26 PM |
Glider tracking - Spot etc... | Bill Daniels | Soaring | 5 | January 3rd 08 05:32 AM |