motorgliders as towplanes

That would not be possible......only "momentary". You can't "keep"
"everything else" constant.

Yes, there would be a "momentary" increase in lift......but......

Glider would experience "acceleration", change in velocity, and or
direction. (Most likely glider would "nose up" (change in direction)
then "slow down" (change in velocity) finally resume steady flight with
greater drag giving steeper glide angle.

Once "stabilized" flight is resumed, vector analysis shows flaps do not
increase lift. Yes, the coefficient of lift has changed but not the
actual lift (other than a really, really tiny reduction due to new flgith
path)

Similar for spoilers

Cookie




At 09:40 20 March 2009, The Real Doctor wrote:
On 20 Mar, 01:15, Bob Cook wrote:

If we draw vector force diagrams of two identical gliders, one with
flaps
extended, and the other with flaps retracted, we can easily see that
"lift" is essentially the same in both cases.

What happens if you extend the flaps on a glider while keeping
everything else (AoA, airspeed) constant?

Ian

You guys have proven 2 fundamental truths.

1) In any engineering discussion. If you don't define terms at the
start, you just chase yourself around in a circle.

2) Pilots don't need to know much about aerodyanmics to fly well.

Oh yeah,

3) Flight instructors explain these things more to make a point than
to be accurate :-)


Todd Smith
3S

On 20 Mar, 13:29, wrote:
You guys have proven 2 fundamental truths.

1) *In any engineering discussion. *If you don't define terms at the
start, you just chase yourself around in a circle.

What, exactly, do you mean by "circle"?

2) *Pilots don't need to know much about aerodyanmics to fly well.

I suspect it only distracts from the task at hand.

3) Flight instructors explain these things more to make a point than
to be accurate :-)

And how. I just wish they'd tell the rest of us what the point is ...

Ian

A physicist acquantance who wrote a book on Newton and aerodynamics said
that the mathematics was taken over from electrical theory because the
equations balanced, but that they don't explain what is cause and what is
effect. That's the feeling I get when you start talking about something
called theta as if it were proof.

Seems to me we have a new theology going here -- something akin to
pre-milleniumism versus post-milleniumism.


At 13:29 20 March 2009, wrote:
You guys have proven 2 fundamental truths.

1) In any engineering discussion. If you don't define terms at the
start, you just chase yourself around in a circle.

2) Pilots don't need to know much about aerodyanmics to fly well.

Oh yeah,

3) Flight instructors explain these things more to make a point than
to be accurate :-)


Todd Smith
3S