![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 29, 11:36*am, Tuno wrote:
Erik, You're not using the CAI for navigation, right? The only reason you'd need turnpoints in there is for electronic declarations for badges and record attempts. So for those, just put in the ones you need for that purpose. What do you use for navigation? 2NO What can I say... I'm old-fashioned (read: Cheap). Yeah, the primary NAV in P3 is the Model 20 communicating to an old Compaq Aero running GNII. I want the primary declaration to be in the Model 20 along with all of the landing points within the triangular task area. The EW will be the "dumb" backup with an exact duplicate of the declaration. What I was hoping someone would say is "Oh sure, there's an option in SeeYou mysteriously hidden under some non-intutitive submenu to 'select waypoints within task area'". I can dream... I do know a brute force way around this, but i'd prefer not to have to semi-manually go in and pick the landpoints. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 29, 10:02*am, Papa3 wrote:
What can I say... I'm old-fashioned (read: Cheap). *Yeah, the primary NAV in P3 is the Model 20 communicating to an old Compaq Aero running GNII. * I want the primary declaration to be in the Model 20 along with all of the landing points within the triangular task area. You still don't need to have any waypoints in the Model 20. I used to have a setup like that in my old ship and had a whole lot more than 250 waypoints in the Aero, and none in the '20. When I'd declare a task in GNII, it would upload the needed waypoints into the Model 20. That was back in 2000, so my memory might be a bit foggy, but an pretty sure that's how I did it. -Tom |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Erik, you're on to the right way of doing it. Don't rely on a PDA to
remain connected to the logger. They can fail, and also pilot errors such as finding as you load up the glider that you left the PDA at home are not unheard of. (Such foolishness could be a reason I always have a panel-mounted GPS display too.) Jim |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 29, 3:53*pm, 5Z wrote:
On Mar 29, 10:02*am, Papa3 wrote: What can I say... I'm old-fashioned (read: Cheap). *Yeah, the primary NAV in P3 is the Model 20 communicating to an old Compaq Aero running GNII. * I want the primary declaration to be in the Model 20 along with all of the landing points within the triangular task area. You still don't need to have any waypoints in the Model 20. *I used to have a setup like that in my old ship and had a whole lot more than 250 waypoints in the Aero, and none in the '20. *When I'd declare a task in GNII, it would upload the needed waypoints into the Model 20. That was back in 2000, so my memory might be a bit foggy, but an pretty sure that's how I did it. -Tom Hi Tom, Yes and no. It will load the points. However, it can be a "creaky" solution. I had at least one record flight squished when I went to load special use airspace after the task had been declared. I did this in flight, and sure enough, it tried to reload all of the waypoints but stopped at 250. Unfortunately, one of the ones required for the task wasn't there, and it then threw some sort of "invalid task" error. I just want to make sure that I have one and only one file to use and that everthing is nice and neat before takeoff. Frankly, I'm doing this out of an "excess of caution", as I will make sure that the backup logger and main logger have the same task declarations, and it's a flight I can fly without really needing the PDA. P3 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Papa3 wrote:
Frankly, I'm doing this out of an "excess of caution", as I will make sure that the backup logger and main logger have the same task declarations, and it's a flight I can fly without really needing the PDA. Are you allowed to have two declarations? Or do you need a paper declaration if you want to use more than one logger? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * Sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 30, 3:56*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Papa3 wrote: Frankly, I'm doing this out of an "excess of caution", as I will make sure that the backup logger and main logger have the same task declarations, and it's a flight I can fly without really needing the PDA. Are you allowed to have two declarations? Or do you need a paper declaration if you want to use more than one logger? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes"http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * * * Sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" atwww.motorglider.org Yes and no. The answer in SC3C (OO Guide) is as follows: Where more than one FR is carried, each one must be checked to ensure the last declaration made before take-off is applied to the flight. This may be an electronic or a written declaration, whichever is closest to the take-off time. (Note the timing warning given in para 7.4.) Some pilots may prefer to make a written declaration even though carrying a flight recorder or recorders to avoid making electronic changes at a busy period before take-off. Pilots would be well advised to prepare and use a declaration form that ensures that all the required data required is included. (See SC3 4.1 and sample form in Appendix 10 in this Annex). So, you obviously can't have two different courses declared in different FRs and then pick the one that you end up flying. However, it's up to the OO to look at both loggers to make sure this doesn't happen. Now, if, for example, I had made the declaration on the Cambridge Model 20 before flight but accidentally tromped on it in flight, then it would no longer be "the last declaration made before takeoff" in which case my read is that the backup would then contain the official declaration. Unless I had made a written declaration which is time stamped after the one on the backup. I (almost always) do a written declaration as well, since my trust in all things electronic is less than iron-clad. However, since the last FR declaration before takeoff is official, I do want to make sure that the chances of a screw-up are minimized. P3 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 30, 5:36*pm, Papa3 wrote:
On Mar 30, 3:56*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote: Papa3 wrote: Frankly, I'm doing this out of an "excess of caution", as I will make sure that the backup logger and main logger have the same task declarations, and it's a flight I can fly without really needing the PDA. Are you allowed to have two declarations? Or do you need a paper declaration if you want to use more than one logger? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes"http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * * * Sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" atwww.motorglider.org Yes and no. * The answer in SC3C (OO Guide) is as follows: Where more than one FR is carried, each one must be checked to ensure the last declaration made before take-off is applied to the flight. This may be an electronic or a written declaration, whichever is closest to the take-off time. (Note the timing warning given in para 7.4.) Some pilots may prefer to make a written declaration even though carrying a flight recorder or recorders to avoid making electronic changes at a busy period before take-off. Pilots would be well advised to prepare and use a declaration form that ensures that all the required data required is included. (See SC3 4.1 and sample form in Appendix 10 in this Annex). So, you obviously can't have two different courses declared in different FRs and then pick the one that you end up flying. *However, it's up to the OO to look at both loggers to make sure this doesn't happen. * *Now, if, for example, I had made the declaration on the Cambridge Model 20 before flight but accidentally tromped on it in flight, then it would no longer be "the last declaration made before takeoff" in which case my read is that the backup would then contain the official declaration. * Unless I had made a written declaration which is time stamped after the one on the backup. I (almost always) do a written declaration as well, since my trust in all things electronic is less than iron-clad. * However, since the last FR declaration before takeoff is official, I do want to make sure that the chances of a screw-up are minimized. P3- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Last sentence should read "However, since the last declaration before takeoff is official..." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Waypoint/turnpoint files | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | March 7th 08 04:23 PM |
Turnpoint database | [email protected] | Soaring | 6 | November 11th 05 11:11 PM |
Turnpoint conversion SW? | For Example John Smith | Soaring | 11 | March 23rd 05 06:56 PM |
Turnpoint descriptions | Tuno | Soaring | 5 | June 27th 04 02:41 PM |
FAI turnpoint Question | Mark Grubb | Soaring | 13 | February 15th 04 02:31 AM |