![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 02 Jan 2004 16:27:31 -0800, Hobo wrote:
In article , Mary Shafer wrote: I know that we always worried about the HiMAT (Highly Maneuverable Aircraft Technology, a subscale research vehicle capable of 0.9 Mach) escaping from remote-piloting control and zipping over the San Gabriels to Pasadena because it's so close. So much so, in fact, that we put a backup control into the back seat of an F-104 that we chased it with. Was the F-104 equipped to shoot down the HIMAT, if necessary? No. It was prepared to control it well enough to get it back close enough for the regular system to take over. I think there was also a range safety package that would destroy the HiMAT if necessary, but I think it was only in the control room and not in the chase plane. I'd have to check on that, though. Mary -- Mary Shafer Retired aerospace research engineer |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Massive Israeli Flyover, Possible Trouble Nov 21 | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 8 | November 20th 03 04:05 AM |
Boeing shares rose as high as $38.90, up $2.86, in morning trade! | Larry Dighera | Military Aviation | 0 | October 29th 03 08:49 PM |