A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Laser CIWS



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11  
Old January 3rd 04, 08:43 AM
John Keeney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Bjørnar Bolsøy" am
Date: 1/2/2004 5:42 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

(B2431) wrote in
:
From: "Bjørnar Bolsøy"
am
Date: 1/2/2004 1:15 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


With weight ever decreasing, does anyone know if there has
been/is a project on something like this:


http://members.rogers.com/biglasers/continuous/abl.html


..intended to replace this?


http://www.military.cz/usa/navy/weap...phalanx_en.htm




Regards...

Not likely. The ABL is designed to be fired in the clear air at
altitude. A ship borne version would face problems with smoke,
fog and sea spray interferance.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired



But impossible to overcome? I think there are som arguments
in favor:

1. A ship is a more stable platform than an airplane
2. The ABL's targets are houndreds of miles away, while
CIWS operate in less than a mile
3. More powerful lasers and advances in adaptive optics will
compensate for air distortions


For ship use it's not so much air "distortions" you have to
worry about as air "absorption." The wrong wave lengths
will be expend their energy quite quickly heating the air
instead of the target.

Good points.

I have no idea how die lasers work but I wonder how long they shelf life

of the
chemicals are. In the case of the airborne version they can be prepared

just
prior to flight. Again not an insoluable problem for boats.


Depends on the specific chemistry of laser.
However, solid state lasers are fast approaching the useful
power range and all you have to feed them is electricity.

When I mentioned sea spray I sould also have said rain. I don't know if

they
can be optically corrected for.


There's no amount of optical correction that will deal with absorption.
You simply have to have a laser wave length which is not too badly
absorbed in that environment. This in turn means that a weapons grade
laser at 30000ft may be totally unsuited for a surface combatant.

Weapons grade power levels out of lasers are hard, weapons grade
power levels at wave lengths chosen for reasons other than they
are easy to produce is much harder.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Boeing $241.8 million contract ballistic missile-hunting Airborne Laser Larry Dighera Military Aviation 1 May 29th 04 12:05 PM
status of Air-Borne Laser programme? Ralph Savelsberg Military Aviation 4 October 29th 03 09:24 AM
Ailerons on Laser Kelvin & Janice Rempel Aerobatics 0 October 26th 03 11:13 AM
Laser simulator provides weapons training Otis Willie Military Aviation 0 August 28th 03 09:58 PM
Status of MIRACL laser system? Thomas J. Paladino Jr. Military Aviation 1 July 17th 03 10:40 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.