![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 20, 5:08*pm, Uncle Fuzzy wrote:
On Apr 20, 12:47*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote: Adam wrote: Consider the D-160" model, which will likely break 400 mph next Santa Ana season. It weighs 50 pounds and the spar is designed to withstand over 4000 lbf. So it can over 100g when you consider the wing make over half the weight of the plane. 50 pounds moving at 400 mph could cause multiple fatalities if it plowed into some bystanders. How do they make these models safe to fly? Do they have insurance? How big/heavy can a "model" be before it becomes a UAV, and perhaps regulated by the FAA? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes"http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * * * Sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" atwww.motorglider.org Good point, but even a 1 pound plane could kill you at that speed. Back in the stone age, when I was slope racing RC gliders, I think the AMA imposed weight limit was 10 pounds. The AMA limit is 55 pounds. However the AMA does not regulate, only insure, lobby, and liaise. So if you want to be covered by the AMA policy that membership affords, you best follow the AMA safety code found he http://www.modelaircraft.org/files/105.pdf The FAA has this to say with regards to model aviation: http://www.modelaircraft.org/files/540-C.pdf Safety is a concern of course. Often the radar operator will stand behind a very large pile of rocks or car. But many stand exposed to the trajectory and by default accept the risks associated with that. It is difficult to believe but more people have been killed participating in a thermal duration model sailplane contest that by a model sailplane engaged in dynamic soaring. /Adam |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Adam wrote:
The AMA limit is 55 pounds. However the AMA does not regulate, only insure, lobby, and liaise. So if you want to be covered by the AMA policy that membership affords, you best follow the AMA safety code found he http://www.modelaircraft.org/files/105.pdf Wow, they've really raised the weight limit since I was flying models! Also, the thermal fliers regularly exceed the 400 feet, don't they? Not likely an issue for the dynamic soarers, I suppose. Personally, I've never even seen a model while I've been flying, except waaay down there on a slope soaring hill. The FAA has this to say with regards to model aviation: http://www.modelaircraft.org/files/540-C.pdf This document is 28 years old. Does the FAA know what's going on now? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * Sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 20, 10:21*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
This document is 28 years old. Does the FAA know what's going on now? Bwahahahaha ROTFL! .... sorry, I couldn't help myself. You mean model 'gliders' aren't made of balsa sticks, tissue, and dope any more?? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 21, 12:21*am, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Adam wrote: The AMA limit is 55 pounds. However the AMA does not regulate, only insure, lobby, and liaise. So if you want to be covered by the AMA policy that membership affords, you best follow the AMA safety code found he http://www.modelaircraft.org/files/105.pdf Wow, they've really raised the weight limit since I was flying models! Also, the thermal fliers regularly exceed the 400 feet, don't they? Not likely an issue for the dynamic soarers, I suppose. Personally, I've never even seen a model while I've been flying, except waaay down there on a slope soaring hill. The FAA has this to say with regards to model aviation: http://www.modelaircraft.org/files/540-C.pdf This document is 28 years old. Does the FAA know what's going on now? -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes"http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * * * Sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" atwww.motorglider.org Eric, The document is current. Read the following regarding current developments in UAVs and current model practice (same as 1981): http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/E7-2402.htm I repeat, AMA is not "law", just a lobbying group and insurer. I have no idea from where the 55 pound limit comes. DS, slope and thermal planes can all easily exceed 400' but FAA recommends against such activities. What is your concern with today's modeling practices? /Adam |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Adam wrote:
Eric, The document is current. Read the following regarding current developments in UAVs and current model practice (same as 1981): http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2007/E7-2402.htm I repeat, AMA is not "law", just a lobbying group and insurer. I have no idea from where the 55 pound limit comes. DS, slope and thermal planes can all easily exceed 400' but FAA recommends against such activities. What is your concern with today's modeling practices? Just curiosity. I'm fascinated by how things have changed since I was a big time modeler in the 50s and 60s, when I flew controline, free-flight and RC gas and gliders (towed and hand launched), and then microfilm indoor models while in college. Two buddies from college still do it, one RC slope mainly, the other a wide variety (he even worked for Fox, Estes, and Cox at various times), so I still hear bits and pieces about the scene. The development of autonomous gliders that's going on could almost get me modeling again. I was particularly interested in the Canadian one launched with a high altitude balloon, and figured out when to release and how to get back home by itself. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4 * Sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eric Greenwell wrote:
Also, the thermal fliers regularly exceed the 400 feet, don't they? Absolutely! When I flew thermal R/C sailplanes the winch launch height was typically 400'+. After that the height was limited only by the thermals and your ability to see the model. I'm sure 1000'+ AGL is common, especially with a large span model. My open class model had a 146" span and was not hard to see "way up there". I recall several cases where low flying GA aircraft flew *under* our models. Regards, -Doug |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some points to remember, currently 91-57 "Advises" only, and
Recreational model aircraft are flown "Line of Sight" or VFR if you will. Next, please remember that the vast majority of model aircraft pilots are just as interested in safety as we are, and fly in areas that are not normally flown by full sized planes. Most experienced modelers are very aware of the power and risks of high spped model flight. Many "Radar Operators" aren't aware of much more than the radar gun and getting a high speed recorded, but after seeing one loss of control incident, become believers in a car or large pile of rocks. Yes they're a long way from stick & tissue and it's just as exciting to them as when Bell & Jeager broke the sound barrier, or Lindberg flew the Atlantic ( a model has done it! and more than 3 years ago). As usual, laws and rule making are way behind the technology to do things not even thought of 5, 10 or 20 years ago. Have fun and stay out each others way! Wayne |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SSA: Good Guys & Bad Guys | [email protected] | Soaring | 1 | October 5th 06 04:11 AM |
Guys, guys, guys -- the party is TOMORROW night! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 3 | July 24th 05 05:26 AM |
Guys | Dummy | Simulators | 3 | August 30th 04 12:58 PM |
Guys | Dummy | General Aviation | 1 | August 23rd 04 11:42 PM |
You guys were right -- thanks! | Jay Honeck | Piloting | 27 | July 28th 03 10:50 PM |