![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 31, 12:35*am, Veeduber wrote:
On May 30, 9:21*am, bildan wrote: To build this engine would require making a case, crank and rods with the planetary in a nose case with thrust bearings. *(Of course a lot of other fiddly bits would need to be made as well.) *However, the heads, cylinders and pistons are the hard part and they are available cheap. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I disagree with regard to the heads and cylinders. *But you are correct when it comes to the gear reduction unit. As several others have pointed out, publicly and in private messages, there has been significant advances in metallurgy since the Pobjoy first ran in 1926. The Pobjoy had its share of problems, from its inception until its production was finally dropped in 1946. *But those problems would probably not apply if the engine were produced today. *For example, the use of a planetary gear reduction system would eliminate the wear problems encountered with the original herringbone gear, while a modern, fully sealed valve train would improve the engine's mean time before failure. As for the question of using existing cylinders and heads, an aircraft engine uses a different design philosophy than is used when producing any other type of engine, although a stationary industrial engine comes very close. Ideally, the heads should follow standard aircraft engine practice in the use of forgings rather than castings, although if the engine were kitted, even partially so -- perhaps a pre-assembled lower end plus a kit of parts for the cylinders and heads -- *the price may be low enough to satisfy the home-builder's budget limitations. *For example, if the heads were already machined, it does not take a great deal of skill to swage the valve seats into place nor to stone them. Volkswagen parts could be used for almost the entire valve train. As a point of interest, while the basic idea is to produce an engine sufficiently low in cost as to fulfill the needs of home-builders around the world, should we be able to tap into a manufacturer at this level, it is most likely they might be convinced to use their facilities to produce *the Fat-fin head needed to make the Volkswagen engine more suitable than the existing engines by producing heads having an honest sixty-five horsepower's-worth of fin area. *Indeed, this could be a method of subsidizing the cost of a 'replica' radial -- OR OTHER ENGINE -- *in that home-builders in those parts of the world where Volkswagen components are still in good supply would probably buy enough Fat-fin heads that their sale would provide the start-up funds needed to get a more appropriate engine into production. Toward this end, while I mentioned the Pobjoy because of its excellent ratio of power-to-weight, I also mentioned that an in-line engine such as the de Havilland would be the least expensive. This is another case where modern-day metallurgy may prove beneficial, in that Lost Foam Casting might be used to produce the head and lower end, using aftermarket air-cooled cylinders. *The key to success in this case would be the existence of a suitable crankshaft. *That is, one in which the throws are spaced sufficiently far apart to allow the use of finned barrels. -R.S.Hoover With respect, motorcycle heads are CNC machined from high strength forged alloy billet. To my knowledge, no such head has ever failed even under severe racing conditions. The only 'top end' failures I'm aware of resulted from revving way over red line RPM which caused valve failure. I know of a few which suffered bent rods when the owner tried to start a hydraulically locked engine after fuel had drained into a cylinder. I would SWAG that top end motorcycle heads and cylinder blocks are over designed for aircraft use by around 5X. The motorcycle news group I belongs to recently asked if anyone had EVER overhauled their engine due to simple wear. No one reported they had even though some reported over 300,000 miles on their bikes. One reported tearing down a high-mileage engine after the bike was wrecked just to find out what the tolerances were - and to possibly re-use the parts. He reported no measurable wear. These are enormously strong engines and I think homebuilders should take a serious look at them. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Another home-made helicopter | Dave Whiley | Aviation Photos | 0 | November 19th 07 11:45 PM |
Home Made Helicopter | J.F. | Aviation Photos | 0 | November 17th 07 02:02 PM |
Good news for scratch builders of metal airplanes - Home Depot rents bending brakes | flybynightkarmarepair | Home Built | 7 | January 6th 07 04:22 PM |
Home made plane crashes | Bill Smith | Piloting | 0 | August 7th 06 06:07 AM |
Home made aviation websites are cool! | CFLav8r | Piloting | 2 | January 21st 04 05:31 AM |