A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Performance loss versus yaw string deflection



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 15th 09, 05:49 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Eric Greenwell
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,096
Default V Performance loss versus yaw string deflection

bumper wrote:
"Eric Greenwell" wrote in message
...
I don't recall ever seeing an estimate of the performance loss in a glider
as a function of yaw string deflection. Does anyone know what it is?

Ultimately, I'm wondering how much attention should be paid to deflections
of, say, 1/8", 1/4", 1/2", etc., on the usual 4"-5" long yaw string.

I suppose a professionally manufactured and tested yaw string, like the Mk
IV, comes with a performance correction card (much like compass has), but
I just have a blemished one I got an outlet store - no card.

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly


Eric,

I take this yaw string business seriously, though admittedly making MKIV's
is a whole different thing than being able to fly with them straight. No
card is provided with the MKIV, as we have no control over which side of the
equator the MKIV is to be used. And, as I'm sure you are aware, coriolis
effect can wreck havoc upon yaw strings if they are not properly degaussed.

Without glider specific flight testing, we may still assume that in straight
flight and with the yaw string straight back, we have unity or 100%.
With the yaw string 90 degrees off to the side or anything forward of that,
we have a problem, or for our purposes, 0%.

By extrapolation . . . Ummm, what was the original question?

bumper
proudly churning out MKIV and QV's for the unwashed masses.


I've just read on aviationblather.com the FAA is cooking up a new NPRM
to require all MKIV yaw string installations to display a 2" square
placard within 6" of the yaw string. The placard supposedly shows a yaw
string at right angles to the canopy, with a red circle/slash over it.
Not only would this raise the cost of the MKIV, but it would reduce the
pilot's view of the sky and increase the chance of collisions. Another
example of bureaucratic meddling!

--
Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA
* Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly

* "Transponders in Sailplanes" http://tinyurl.com/y739x4
* Sections on Mode S, TPAS, ADS-B, Flarm, more

* "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" at www.motorglider.org
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What angle creates MAXIMUM air deflection? [email protected] General Aviation 6 January 30th 07 01:38 AM
Full deflection = missed approach ??? pgbnh Instrument Flight Rules 33 October 21st 05 01:57 PM
"zero" versus "oscar" versus "sierra" Ron Garret Piloting 30 December 20th 04 08:49 AM
US kill loss ratio versus Russian pilots in Korean War? Rats Military Aviation 21 January 26th 04 08:56 AM
P-47/51 deflection shots into the belly of the German tanks,reality ArtKramr Military Aviation 131 September 7th 03 09:02 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.