![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As interesting as it is the discussion about who did what in the last war
has about as much relevance to gliding and safe winching as a tesion controlled winch. The differences are too numerous to mention except that a Spitfire, Hurricane and Mustang all worked and did a useful job, unlike the mythical tension controlled winch. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 'constant tension' theory of winch launching was dreamed up by
someone in the US who has no practical experience of winch launching whatsoever! So far nobody has managed to built a true tension winch (which would measure actual cable tension), so we don't know if the theory would work or not. The concept seems to have become a bit of a Holy Grail in the US, which is probably inhibiting the design and building of more conventional winches that would work just fine. On the Yahoo Winch Design site I have suggested carrying out some autotowing experiments, where it would fairly easy to mount an in-line load cell to find out if CT would work, but this suggestion was rejected by the above person and his followers as not being relevant due to the mass and inertia of the towcar. Such an experiment would work in calm conditions. There are a number of constraints in real life winch launching. 1) The minimum airspeed has to be at least 1.3 x the normal stalling speed (Vs), to avoid the risk of stalling or spinning at the increased wing loading due to the cable pull. At the high levels of pull suggested this might increase to 1.4 Vs. 2) The optimum climbing airspeed for best gain of height seems from practical experience to be in the range 1.5-1.6Vs. 3) Most gliders have a fairly low maximum winch launching speed (Vw), which is set for structural reasons. There should also be a weak link (fuse) included in the cable line which will break before the glider does. 4) Many gliders, particularly older ones such as the K13, only have a very limited speed range in which they will climb safely and well without exceeding Vw. The stalling speed of a K13 can increase to over 50knots near the top of the launch, its optimum climb speed is about 56knots and its Vw is 58knots. Some more modern types such as the K21 are a bit more speed tolerant. 5) You have to fly the glider in such a manner that you can always recover from a cable break or winch power failure, and not risk a stall or flick spin. This entails a fairly shallow initial climb followed by a controlled rotation rate of not more than 10 degrees per second. I believe the Germans once managed to kill 12 pilots in one year (1995) by carrying out what are known as 'kavalier starts' where the glider climbs very steeply straight off the ground to maximise height. We have also had a few such accidents in the UK, always on very powerful winches so rapid acceleration doesn't make them safe. The theory behind constant tension is you provide a pull or tension that is close to the breaking strain of the weak link. Thus you maximise the pull and the height gain in accordance with the Goulthorpe formula: h = P/W/(1+P/W) x l where h = height, P= Pull, W = glider weight and l = notional cable run from the point of rotation. Thus for a Pull equal to the weight of the glider you would expect to get a height of 50% of the effective cable length. However, the above equation is idealised and assumes zero cable weight and zero drag, and is based on 100% transfer of energy. For many years I launched on very powerful manually driven Tost winches. Many of the launches were way over Vw until you signalled too fast, but it was quite rare to break a weak link in the early part of the climb. I therefore suspect that the constant tension as a large fraction of the weak link strength idea would just vastly overspeed the launches. In order to contain the speed according to the theory, you would have to climb at an achieved climb angle of about 60 degrees. Most gliders run out of up elevator well below this angle. Such an angle would also represent more than a 'kavalier start' as described above! The other idea in the 'constant tension' theory is that the glider pilot would control the speed by pulling back harder to slow the launch down and easing forward to speed up. However I worry that a pilot trying to control the speed at the same time as the winch is trying to sense and control the tension would just lead to an oscillating or hunting situation. As a winch driver myself, I always try to avoid 'chasing the glider pilot' as this generally makes things worse. If I have to make a speed adjustment I just move the throttle to a slightly different setting and then hold it still again. The technique for controlling the airspeed from the glider end does work on a Skylaunch winch where you are giving a constant power setting and also works on constant torque Supacat (diesel + fluid flywheel)) winches. With either type of winch you have to start backing off the throttle setting near the top of the launch to avoid overspeeding the glider. We don't know if constant tension would give a constant and appropriate airspeed, or whether it would need to be varied for different stages of the launch to achieve this. Derek Copeland At 19:45 26 July 2009, Don Johnstone wrote: As interesting as it is the discussion about who did what in the last war has about as much relevance to gliding and safe winching as a tesion controlled winch. The differences are too numerous to mention except that a Spitfire, Hurricane and Mustang all worked and did a useful job, unlike the mythical tension controlled winch. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As I see it the "constant tension" theory relies on being able to measure
the tension being exerted on the glider release at the winch drum. Quite how this might be achieved is very puzzling and has no relevance to the information required to give a safe and effective launch. If you were to say that measuring the tension at the glider release and using telemetry to pass this information to the winch then that might indeed work, however if you were going to the trouble of doing that you might as well send useful information, like the airspeed of the glider, so the winch driver could maintain a constant speed. Cable tension during a winch launch has sod all to do with anything except as an indicator to the winch driver of possible over or underspeed. It is the speed which is of relevance and importance. At 13:15 27 July 2009, Del C wrote: The 'constant tension' theory of winch launching was dreamed up by someone in the US who has no practical experience of winch launching whatsoever! So far nobody has managed to built a true tension winch (which would measure actual cable tension), so we don't know if the theory would work or not. The concept seems to have become a bit of a Holy Grail in the US, which is probably inhibiting the design and building of more conventional winches that would work just fine. On the Yahoo Winch Design site I have suggested carrying out some autotowing experiments, where it would fairly easy to mount an in-line load cell to find out if CT would work, but this suggestion was rejected by the above person and his followers as not being relevant due to the mass and inertia of the towcar. Such an experiment would work in calm conditions. There are a number of constraints in real life winch launching. 1) The minimum airspeed has to be at least 1.3 x the normal stalling speed (Vs), to avoid the risk of stalling or spinning at the increased wing loading due to the cable pull. At the high levels of pull suggested this might increase to 1.4 Vs. 2) The optimum climbing airspeed for best gain of height seems from practical experience to be in the range 1.5-1.6Vs. 3) Most gliders have a fairly low maximum winch launching speed (Vw), which is set for structural reasons. There should also be a weak link (fuse) included in the cable line which will break before the glider does. 4) Many gliders, particularly older ones such as the K13, only have a very limited speed range in which they will climb safely and well without exceeding Vw. The stalling speed of a K13 can increase to over 50knots near the top of the launch, its optimum climb speed is about 56knots and its Vw is 58knots. Some more modern types such as the K21 are a bit more speed tolerant. 5) You have to fly the glider in such a manner that you can always recover from a cable break or winch power failure, and not risk a stall or flick spin. This entails a fairly shallow initial climb followed by a controlled rotation rate of not more than 10 degrees per second. I believe the Germans once managed to kill 12 pilots in one year (1995) by carrying out what are known as 'kavalier starts' where the glider climbs very steeply straight off the ground to maximise height. We have also had a few such accidents in the UK, always on very powerful winches so rapid acceleration doesn't make them safe. The theory behind constant tension is you provide a pull or tension that is close to the breaking strain of the weak link. Thus you maximise the pull and the height gain in accordance with the Goulthorpe formula: h = P/W/(1+P/W) x l where h = height, P= Pull, W = glider weight and l = notional cable run from the point of rotation. Thus for a Pull equal to the weight of the glider you would expect to get a height of 50% of the effective cable length. However, the above equation is idealised and assumes zero cable weight and zero drag, and is based on 100% transfer of energy. For many years I launched on very powerful manually driven Tost winches. Many of the launches were way over Vw until you signalled too fast, but it was quite rare to break a weak link in the early part of the climb. I therefore suspect that the constant tension as a large fraction of the weak link strength idea would just vastly overspeed the launches. In order to contain the speed according to the theory, you would have to climb at an achieved climb angle of about 60 degrees. Most gliders run out of up elevator well below this angle. Such an angle would also represent more than a 'kavalier start' as described above! The other idea in the 'constant tension' theory is that the glider pilot would control the speed by pulling back harder to slow the launch down and easing forward to speed up. However I worry that a pilot trying to control the speed at the same time as the winch is trying to sense and control the tension would just lead to an oscillating or hunting situation. As a winch driver myself, I always try to avoid 'chasing the glider pilot' as this generally makes things worse. If I have to make a speed adjustment I just move the throttle to a slightly different setting and then hold it still again. The technique for controlling the airspeed from the glider end does work on a Skylaunch winch where you are giving a constant power setting and also works on constant torque Supacat (diesel + fluid flywheel)) winches. With either type of winch you have to start backing off the throttle setting near the top of the launch to avoid overspeeding the glider. We don't know if constant tension would give a constant and appropriate airspeed, or whether it would need to be varied for different stages of the launch to achieve this. Derek Copeland At 19:45 26 July 2009, Don Johnstone wrote: As interesting as it is the discussion about who did what in the last war has about as much relevance to gliding and safe winching as a tesion controlled winch. The differences are too numerous to mention except that a Spitfire, Hurricane and Mustang all worked and did a useful job, unlike the mythical tension controlled winch. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() At Feshiebridge, Scotland, AIUI they developed telemetry for indicating glider airspeed to the winch driver, and it was said to work very well. IIRC, it did not send an airspeed number in knots, but rather an indication of too slow, a bit slow, OK, a bit fast, or too fast (or something like that) which is what the winch driver really needs to know, they believed. The unit in the glider was calibrated for the glider type. It needs somebody with first hand experience of it to tell more, and I don’t know if it has been kept going. Chris N. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Skylaunch sell a telemetry system called 'Launch Assistant' which relays
the actual airspeed of the glider to an LCD display mounted somewhere in the view of the driver. It costs a few hundred dollars in total. See: http://www.skylaunchuk.com/ Derek Copeland At 16:49 27 July 2009, Chris Nicholas wrote: At Feshiebridge, Scotland, AIUI they developed telemetry for indicating glider airspeed to the winch driver, and it was said to work very well. IIRC, it did not send an airspeed number in knots, but rather an indication of too slow, a bit slow, OK, a bit fast, or too fast (or something like that) which is what the winch driver really needs to know, they believed. The unit in the glider was calibrated for the glider type. It needs somebody with first hand experience of it to tell more, and I don=92t know if it has been kept going. Chris N. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We have the Skylaunch telemetry installed in one of our ships as a
trial, and have found it to be a very useful tool for the winch driver. The winch cab display "lights up" at about the time of rotation and a quick scan of the glider airspeed is very useful in assessing the airspeed trend during the climb. It is particularly useful as the glider begins the round out as an airspeed cue during the reduction in line tension. The low cost makes this a very nice innovation and we plan to install the units in our other club gliders. Bob On Jul 27, 1:45�pm, Derek Copeland wrote: Skylaunch sell a telemetry system called 'Launch Assistant' which relays the actual airspeed of the glider to an LCD display mounted somewhere in the view of the driver. It costs a few hundred dollars in total. See: http://www.skylaunchuk.com/ Derek Copeland At 16:49 27 July 2009, Chris Nicholas wrote: At Feshiebridge, Scotland, AIUI they developed telemetry for indicating glider airspeed to the winch driver, and it was said to work very well. IIRC, it did not send an airspeed number in knots, but rather an indication of too slow, a bit slow, OK, a bit fast, or too fast (or something like that) which is what the winch driver really needs to know, they believed. The unit in the glider was calibrated for the glider type. It needs somebody with first hand experience of it to tell more, and I don=92t know if it has been kept going. Chris N.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I suspect fitting each and every glider with a telemetry transmitter
would be prohibitively expensive and resisted by most. A member of my club did this as an experimental demonstration and I was able to drive the winch to the appropriate airspeed. Getting accurate airspeed from a rope mounted device for the whole fleet could be problematic. Tension telemetry would be much easier to construct and ruggedize and limiting tension by glider type (and loading) is doable, probably more easily with hydraulically or electrically driven drums than with the reciprocating and rotating weight of IC engines in a direct drive (including automatic transmissions and drive trains) where airspeed output would be more easily used. Tension control should allow for wind gradients and shears but the control algorithms need to smooth the changes to avoid surges and hunting. Manually driven winches should not be discounted, but I have some ideas about standardization of controls and operating methods. Frank Whiteley On Jul 27, 9:30*am, Don Johnstone wrote: As I see it the "constant tension" theory relies on being able to measure the tension being exerted on the glider release at the winch drum. Quite how this might be achieved is very puzzling and has no relevance to the information required to give a safe and effective launch. If you were to say that measuring the tension at the glider release and using telemetry to pass this information to the winch then that might indeed work, however if you were going to the trouble of doing that you might as well send useful information, like the airspeed of the glider, so the winch driver could maintain a constant speed. Cable tension during a winch launch has sod all to do with anything except as an indicator to the winch driver of possible over or underspeed. It is the speed which is of relevance and importance. At 13:15 27 July 2009, Del C wrote: The 'constant tension' theory of winch launching was dreamed up by someone in the US who has no practical experience of winch launching whatsoever! So far nobody has managed to built a true tension winch (which would measure actual cable tension), so we don't know if the theory would work or not. The concept seems to have become a bit of a Holy Grail in the US, which is probably inhibiting the design and building of more conventional winches that would work just fine. On the Yahoo Winch Design site I have suggested carrying out some autotowing experiments, where it would fairly easy to mount an in-line load cell to find out if CT would work, but this suggestion was rejected by the above person and his followers as not being relevant due to the mass and inertia of the towcar. Such an experiment would work in calm conditions. There are a number of constraints in real life winch launching. 1) The minimum airspeed has to be at least 1.3 x the normal stalling speed (Vs), to avoid the risk of stalling or spinning at the increased wing loading due to the cable pull. At the high levels of pull suggested this might increase to 1.4 Vs. 2) The optimum climbing airspeed for best gain of height seems from practical experience to be in the range 1.5-1.6Vs. 3) Most gliders have a fairly low maximum winch launching speed (Vw), which is set for structural reasons. There should also be a weak link (fuse) included in the cable line which will break before the glider does. 4) Many gliders, particularly older ones such as the K13, only have a very limited speed range in which they will climb safely and well without exceeding Vw. The stalling speed of a K13 can increase to over 50knots near the top of the launch, its optimum climb speed is about 56knots and its Vw is 58knots. Some more modern types such as the K21 are a bit more speed tolerant. 5) You have to fly the glider in such a manner *that you can always recover from a cable break or winch power failure, and not risk a stall or flick spin. This entails a fairly shallow initial climb followed by a controlled rotation rate of not more than 10 degrees per second. I believe the Germans once managed to kill 12 pilots in one year (1995) by carrying out what are known as 'kavalier starts' where the glider climbs very steeply straight off the ground to maximise height. We have also had a few such accidents in the UK, always on very powerful winches so rapid acceleration doesn't make them safe. The theory behind constant tension is you provide a pull or tension that is close to the breaking strain of the weak link. Thus you maximise the pull and the height gain in accordance with the Goulthorpe formula: h = P/W/(1+P/W) x l where h = height, P= Pull, W = glider weight and l = notional cable run from the point of rotation. Thus for a Pull equal to the weight of the glider you would expect to get a height of 50% of the effective cable length. However, the above equation is idealised and assumes zero cable weight and zero drag, and is based on 100% transfer of energy. For many years I launched on very powerful manually driven Tost winches. Many of the launches were way over Vw until you signalled too fast, but it was quite rare to break a weak link in the early part of the climb. I therefore suspect that the constant tension as a large fraction of the weak link strength idea would just vastly overspeed the launches. In order to contain the speed according to the theory, you would have to climb at an achieved climb angle of about 60 degrees. Most gliders run out of up elevator well below this angle. Such an angle would also represent more than a 'kavalier start' as described above! The other idea in the 'constant tension' theory is that the glider pilot would control the speed by pulling back harder to slow the launch down and easing forward to speed up. However I worry that a pilot trying to control the speed at the same time as the winch is trying to sense and control the tension would just lead to an oscillating or hunting situation. As a winch driver myself, I always try to avoid 'chasing the glider pilot' as this generally makes things worse. If I have to make a speed adjustment I just move the throttle to a slightly different setting and then hold it still again. The technique for controlling the airspeed from the glider end does work on a Skylaunch winch where you are giving a constant power setting and also works on constant torque Supacat (diesel + fluid flywheel)) winches. With either type of winch you have to start backing off the throttle setting near the top of the launch to avoid overspeeding the glider. * We don't know if constant tension would give a constant and appropriate airspeed, or whether it would need to be varied for different stages of the launch to achieve this. Derek Copeland At 19:45 26 July 2009, Don Johnstone wrote: As interesting as it is the discussion about who did what in the last war has about as much relevance to gliding and safe winching as a tesion controlled winch. The differences are too numerous to mention except that a Spitfire, Hurricane and Mustang all worked and did a useful job, unlike the mythical tension controlled winch. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Don Johnstone wrote:
... If you were to say that measuring the tension at the glider release and using telemetry to pass this information to the winch then that might indeed work, however if you were going to the trouble of doing that you might as well send useful information, like the airspeed of the glider, so the winch driver could maintain a constant speed. Cable tension during a winch launch has sod all to do with anything except as an indicator to the winch driver of possible over or underspeed. It is the speed which is of relevance and importance. We have recently tested the Launch Assistent that is sold by Skylaunch, http://www.skylaunchuk.com/index.htm and have found that is can be (as the name indicates) an *assistant* to the winch driver to help him/her judge the speed of the plane. It helps escpecially unexperienced winch drivers, or in adverse conditions like shearing winds within the launch. After 20 years of experience as a winch driver and winch instructor (Tost winch) I still believe a well instructed and experienced winch driver (and all winch drivers should have a certain minimum of launches per year) is able to judge and control the launch as good (or even better) than any automated (tension-controlled) system, that in the end also relies on the correct behavior of the pilot instead of the winch driver. -- Peter Scholz ASW 24 JEB |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
At 17:23 27 July 2009, Peter Scholz wrote:
Don Johnstone wrote: ... If you were to say that measuring the tension at the glider release and using telemetry to pass this information to the winch then that might indeed work, however if you were going to the trouble of doing that you might as well send useful information, like the airspeed of the glider, so the winch driver could maintain a constant speed. Cable tension during a winch launch has sod all to do with anything except as an indicator to the winch driver of possible over or underspeed. It is the speed which is of relevance and importance. We have recently tested the Launch Assistent that is sold by Skylaunch, http://www.skylaunchuk.com/index.htm and have found that is can be (as the name indicates) an *assistant* to the winch driver to help him/her judge the speed of the plane. It helps escpecially unexperienced winch drivers, or in adverse conditions like shearing winds within the launch. After 20 years of experience as a winch driver and winch instructor (Tost winch) I still believe a well instructed and experienced winch driver (and all winch drivers should have a certain minimum of launches per year) is able to judge and control the launch as good (or even better) than any automated (tension-controlled) system, that in the end also relies on the correct behavior of the pilot instead of the winch driver. -- Peter Scholz ASW 24 JEB Well, there you have it, problem solved by superior and relevant British engineering and at reasonable cost. Tension controlled winches are obsolete already as we have jumped a stage. Any move to automatic winch driving would be a big big mistake, a good, well trained winch driver is the best way of ensuring safety. Automatic takeoff, automatic landing, automatic crash. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Scholz wrote:
Don Johnstone wrote: ... If you were to say that measuring the tension at the glider release and using telemetry to pass this information to the winch then that might indeed work, however if you were going to the trouble of doing that you might as well send useful information, like the airspeed of the glider, so the winch driver could maintain a constant speed. Cable tension during a winch launch has sod all to do with anything except as an indicator to the winch driver of possible over or underspeed. It is the speed which is of relevance and importance. We have recently tested the Launch Assistent that is sold by Skylaunch, http://www.skylaunchuk.com/index.htm and have found that is can be (as the name indicates) an *assistant* to the winch driver to help him/her judge the speed of the plane. It helps escpecially unexperienced winch drivers, or in adverse conditions like shearing winds within the launch. After 20 years of experience as a winch driver and winch instructor (Tost winch) I still believe a well instructed and experienced winch driver (and all winch drivers should have a certain minimum of launches per year) is able to judge and control the launch as good (or even better) than any automated (tension-controlled) system, that in the end also relies on the correct behavior of the pilot instead of the winch driver. -- Peter Scholz ASW 24 JEB There has been some interesting scientific research beeing done on this topic by the Akaflieg group of the University of Karlsruhe (Germany) some years ago. It would go to far describing it in detail, but one diagram where they measured a winch launch is quite interesting: http://www.akaflieg.uni-karlsruhe.de...%20Schlepp.pdf The parameters measured we Height (blue) Airspeed (magenta) Torque at winch drum axle (dark blue) elevator position (green) Acceleration in x-direction (brown) Acceleration in z-direction (yellow) It shows that what appears to be a relative smooth winch launch, looking at airspeed and height, has a quite significant variation in torque, elevator position and acceleration. The findings of this sientific work in one simple sentence: A simple "constant tension" cannot cope with all the parameters that influence a winch launch and that are dependent on eacht other. So the (also economically) best approach would be to aid the winch driver doing his job right instead of inventing a highly sophisticated fuzzy logic system that may take into account all parameters to act as well as a winch driver. The goal is not to have winch launches that are all perfect and one as optimal as the other, but the goal has to be to have safe winch launches with an acceptable performance. And safety lies within a quite large corridor. -- Peter Scholz ASW 24 JEB |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
SAFE Winch Launching | Derek Copeland[_2_] | Soaring | 185 | August 2nd 17 07:12 PM |
SAFE Winch Launching and automatic gearboxes | bildan | Soaring | 2 | July 20th 09 07:17 PM |
SAFE Winch Launching and automatic gearboxes | bildan | Soaring | 0 | July 20th 09 05:25 PM |
FA: WWII Navy / Career Airline Pilot's Book of Memoirs | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 31st 05 02:19 AM |
FA: WWII Navy / Career Airline Pilot's Book of Memoirs | [email protected] | Aviation Marketplace | 0 | July 25th 05 02:55 PM |