![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Denyav" wrote
Stealth is used today to "knock down the door" and the rest of the stuff does the grunt work. The B-2 and other stealth assets are used to knock down the electronic systems (radar, Yeah right,It proved its abilities,albeit under full ECM support aganist defences of Panama,Afghanistan,Iraq,Serbia etc. (In Balkans two ECM failures meant two f117 damages,but nevermind) The US Military uses ECM and decoys. They would use them whether or not stealth aircraft existed. I wonder how they would fare against US ,UK or German counter LO systems? I don't know what UK and German "counter LO" systems are deployed and integrated into their air defense system, or even if it exists. Today you can detect and track a LO aircraft even more easily than conventional aircraft with multistatics. Your sentence doesn't make sense, so I'm assuming that English isn't your native language, and will leave it at that. The stealty airborne platforms have only a PR value today,and thats the reason why Air Force put them on display on every occasion,even though the passive stealth is an extremely "sight-sensitive" technology !. Fine, Fine. Whatever... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't know what UK and German "counter LO" systems are deployed and
integrated into their air defense system, or even if it exists. But probably you know that an US system exists,so a Mitchell style demonstration would be very useful to settle differences. Your sentence doesn't make sense, so I'm assuming that English isn't your native language, and will leave it at that. It makes excellent sense for the ones who want to understand but a clarification for you,multi static designers love everything that stealth designers do to reduce backscatter. Fine, Fine. Whatever... Spending hundreds of taxpayer billions for an obsolete technology is not fine,I guess. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denyav" wrote in message ... Spending hundreds of taxpayer billions for an obsolete technology is not fine,I guess. What do you care if US taxpayers spend billions on obsolete technology? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What do you care if US taxpayers spend billions on obsolete technology?
Because its my money and I have every right to say how things should be done in this country,even if you disagree with my views. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denyav" wrote in message ... Because its my money and I have every right to say how things should be done in this country,even if you disagree with my views. It's US citizens' money. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It's US citizens' money.
Exactly,so its my money too. Fair enough? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denyav" wrote in message ... Exactly,so its my money too. Fair enough? You're pretty unfamiliar with the US for a US citizen. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stealth homebuilt | C J Campbell | Home Built | 1 | September 15th 04 08:43 AM |
SURVEY on manuals - most important for builders, but never good?? | T-Online | Home Built | 0 | January 23rd 04 04:37 PM |
F-32 vs F-35 | The Raven | Military Aviation | 60 | January 17th 04 08:36 PM |
How long until current 'stealth' techniques are compromised? | muskau | Military Aviation | 38 | January 5th 04 04:27 AM |
Israeli Stealth??? | Kenneth Williams | Military Aviation | 92 | October 22nd 03 04:28 PM |