Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements)

"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "weary"
Date: 1/6/2004 12:25 AM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"Chad Irby" wrote in message
.com...
"weary" wrote:

"Chad Irby" wrote:

"weary" wrote:

Its clear that the people were the real target.

Yeah, the military people.

Then why did the targetting demand that the target must be
in a large urban atrea?

Because pretty much every major unbombed military target in Japan at
the
time was *in* a large urban area.

Then why insisit on it? However you are wrong. The Target
Committee meeting that produced that requirement was held
10-11 May 1945, at which time the bombing campaign was still
in its relatively early stages.


That was before anyone in the system even knew about the atom bombs.

I don't understand the relevance of this comment.

On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 03:00:49 GMT, "weary" wrote:


Then why insisit on it? However you are wrong. The Target
Committee meeting that produced that requirement was held
10-11 May 1945, at which time the bombing campaign was still
in its relatively early stages.


That was before anyone in the system even knew about the atom bombs.

I don't understand the relevance of this comment.


Thats because you havent a clue about the topic being discussed, but are
only here to deliver specious moralising.


greg

--
You do a lot less thundering in the pulpit against the Harlot
after she marches right down the aisle and kicks you in the nuts.

"Greg Hennessy" wrote in message
news
On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 03:00:49 GMT, "weary" wrote:


Then why insisit on it? However you are wrong. The Target
Committee meeting that produced that requirement was held
10-11 May 1945, at which time the bombing campaign was still
in its relatively early stages.


That was before anyone in the system even knew about the atom bombs.

I don't understand the relevance of this comment.


Thats because you havent a clue about the topic being discussed, but are
only here to deliver specious moralising.

That really clears it up