![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 8, 1:16*pm, FBCompton wrote:
Probably less than the number of understrength ropes/weak links. *But that's a different issue being addressed by regulatory authorities. Bill, Which regulatory authorities and where are they doing the addressing? The FAA & NTSB based on a conversation during a recent accident investigation. The NTSB showed up at an accident site that would not normally be on their radar - i.e. a minor accident with no in-flight breakup, fire or fatality. Their main interest was the weak link, ring set and release hook maintenance/replacement records. They were obviously educating themselves while building a data set for a report leading to further action. Another point which arose in that discussion is that if your POH says you need a 650 KG weak link with a + or - 10% tolerance for both winch and aero tow, the old 80 - 200% rule doesn't satisfy that requirement. In most cases, the POH value falls within the 80-200% range. but if it doesn't, the POH weak link value trumps the 80-200% rule. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
You (Double-A) broke it, so you fix it. | Michael Baldwin, Bruce | Products | 0 | November 30th 06 05:01 AM |
Double (or more) posting | flying_monkey | Soaring | 1 | September 1st 06 03:54 PM |
Double tow | [email protected] | Soaring | 2 | October 25th 05 07:16 PM |
Double Tow | Doug LS4 | Soaring | 5 | October 11th 05 02:37 AM |
Rare V-2 Double Launch Pic, WW2 | robert arndt | Military Aviation | 0 | July 8th 03 05:02 PM |