![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi,
That is an interesting point. I wonder if Trig will update the manual with changes to the maximum altitude when the first batch of units destined for the US (after receiving US approvals) ships. Best Regards, Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc. "jcarlyle" wrote in message ... Don't know European rules, but the Trig TT21 installation manual says in Table 3.1 that the altitude is 35,000 feet. -John On Sep 12, 8:08 am, cernauta wrote: The factory brochurehttp://www.trig-avionics.com/library/tt21brochure.pdf indicates that this Class 2 Transponder complies with the European rules for "flying below 15.000 ft". Was it certified for flying up to 35.000 ft in the US? Lucky guys... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 12, 6:49*am, "Paul Remde" wrote:
Hi, That is an interesting point. *I wonder if Trig will update the manual with changes to the maximum altitude when the first batch of units destined for the US (after receiving US approvals) ships. Best Regards, Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc. "jcarlyle" wrote in message ... Don't know European rules, but the Trig TT21 installation manual says in Table 3.1 that the altitude is 35,000 feet. -John On Sep 12, 8:08 am, cernauta wrote: The factory brochurehttp://www.trig-avionics.com/library/tt21brochure.pdf indicates that this Class 2 Transponder complies with the European rules for "flying below 15.000 ft". Was it certified for flying up to 35.000 ft in the US? Lucky guys... Unless I am missing something the TT21 is a "Class 2 Level 2" transponder. The Class 2 part that means it is technically limited to 15,000' and VFR. With 130W nominal (**at the connector**) these transponders are clearly not intended to meet the 125W ERP (Effective Radiated Power) requirement requirement for Class 1 (above 15,000' use). It is anybody's guess what the "Altitude 35,000'" in the spec tables in the documentation is supposed to mean. It is an sloppily written spec, either way is it "Maximum Altitude?" Maximum for what? It could be the maximum operating altitude of the electronics, ignoring the transponder is technically not certified for use above 15,000'. It could be the maximum range of the altitude encoder. It is anybody's guess what it means. This certified altitude Class 1 vs. Class 2 issue has been discussed here before, it is something that should not be driving decisions IMNSHO. The important thing is to install and use a transponder in areas of high traffic/mixed jet traffic (like around Reno) and the Trigg TT21 looks an excellent choice. Darryl |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sep 12, 9:12*am, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Sep 12, 6:49*am, "Paul Remde" wrote: Hi, That is an interesting point. *I wonder if Trig will update the manual with changes to the maximum altitude when the first batch of units destined for the US (after receiving US approvals) ships. Best Regards, Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc. "jcarlyle" wrote in message .... Don't know European rules, but the Trig TT21 installation manual says in Table 3.1 that the altitude is 35,000 feet. -John On Sep 12, 8:08 am, cernauta wrote: The factory brochurehttp://www.trig-avionics.com/library/tt21brochure.pdf indicates that this Class 2 Transponder complies with the European rules for "flying below 15.000 ft". Was it certified for flying up to 35.000 ft in the US? Lucky guys... Unless I am missing something the TT21 is a "Class 2 Level 2" transponder. The Class 2 part that means it is technically limited to 15,000' and VFR. With 130W nominal (**at the connector**) these transponders are clearly not intended to meet the 125W ERP (Effective Radiated Power) requirement requirement for Class 1 (above 15,000' use). It is anybody's guess what the "Altitude 35,000'" in the spec tables in the documentation is supposed to mean. It is an sloppily written spec, either way is it "Maximum Altitude?" Maximum for what? It could be the maximum operating altitude of the electronics, ignoring the transponder is technically not certified for use above 15,000'. It could be the maximum range of the altitude encoder. It is anybody's guess what it means. This certified altitude Class 1 vs. Class 2 issue has been discussed here before, it is *something that should not be driving decisions IMNSHO. The important thing is to install and use a transponder in areas of high traffic/mixed jet traffic (like around Reno) and the Trigg TT21 looks an excellent choice. Darryl Oops I should have said 125 W peak power not ERP. Darryl |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
As a very uneducated pilot,following Paul Remdes suggestions, I was
considering buying a Transponder mode S but then various people said local airports didnt have mode S yet so it woulld be a waste of time for some time to come..is this true? If I buy mode S can it be accessed/ used by the current systems? Some easy to understand stuff would be most welcome! Regards from UK At 16:36 12 September 2009, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Sep 12, 9:12=A0am, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Sep 12, 6:49=A0am, "Paul Remde" wrote: Hi, That is an interesting point. =A0I wonder if Trig will update the manua= l with changes to the maximum altitude when the first batch of units destined = for the US (after receiving US approvals) ships. Best Regards, Paul Remde Cumulus Soaring, Inc. "jcarlyle" wrote in message ..= .. Don't know European rules, but the Trig TT21 installation manual says in Table 3.1 that the altitude is 35,000 feet. -John On Sep 12, 8:08 am, cernauta wrote: The factory brochurehttp://www.trig-avionics.com/library/tt21brochur= e.pdf indicates that this Class 2 Transponder complies with the European rules for "flying below 15.000 ft". Was it certified for flying up t= o 35.000 ft in the US? Lucky guys... Unless I am missing something the TT21 is a "Class 2 Level 2" transponder. The Class 2 part that means it is technically limited to 15,000' and VFR. With 130W nominal (**at the connector**) these transponders are clearly not intended to meet the 125W ERP (Effective Radiated Power) requirement requirement for Class 1 (above 15,000' use). It is anybody's guess what the "Altitude 35,000'" in the spec tables in the documentation is supposed to mean. It is an sloppily written spec, either way is it "Maximum Altitude?" Maximum for what? It could be the maximum operating altitude of the electronics, ignoring the transponder is technically not certified for use above 15,000'. It could be the maximum range of the altitude encoder. It is anybody's guess what it means. This certified altitude Class 1 vs. Class 2 issue has been discussed here before, it is =A0something that should not be driving decisions IMNSHO. The important thing is to install and use a transponder in areas of high traffic/mixed jet traffic (like around Reno) and the Trigg TT21 looks an excellent choice. Darryl Oops I should have said 125 W peak power not ERP. Darryl |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
If you are thinking of buying a transponder, Paul, you should buy a mode S
transponder. You are correct that a lot of the ATC units you may contact will not be Mode S equipped, but they will still recieve the mode A and mode C (4 digit assigned code and altitude). Buying a non-mode S transponder would be a waste of money, as you will need it to enter certain areas and types of airspace in the UK. A transponder mandatory zone means a mode S transponder mandatory zone. At 19:15 12 September 2009, Andy Melville wrote: As a very uneducated pilot,following Paul Remdes suggestions, I was considering buying a Transponder mode S but then various people said local airports didnt have mode S yet so it woulld be a waste of time for some time to come..is this true? If I buy mode S can it be accessed/ used by the current systems? Some easy to understand stuff would be most welcome! Regards from UK |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Mark Dickson
writes If you are thinking of buying a transponder, Paul, you should buy a mode S transponder. You are correct that a lot of the ATC units you may contact will not be Mode S equipped, but they will still recieve the mode A and mode C (4 digit assigned code and altitude). Buying a non-mode S transponder would be a waste of money, as you will need it to enter certain areas and types of airspace in the UK. A transponder mandatory zone means a mode S transponder mandatory zone. Suspect (but am not sure) that all new transponder installations in the UK must be mode S. At 19:15 12 September 2009, Andy Melville wrote: As a very uneducated pilot,following Paul Remdes suggestions, I was considering buying a Transponder mode S but then various people said local airports didnt have mode S yet so it woulld be a waste of time for some time to come..is this true? If I buy mode S can it be accessed/ used by the current systems? Some easy to understand stuff would be most welcome! Regards from UK -- Surfer! Email to: ramwater at uk2 dot net |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() “ . . . in the UK. A transponder mandatory zone means a mode S transponder mandatory zone. “ Wrong, at least for the new Stansted TMZ’s: “ . . . access is permitted to any aircraft which is operating a fully functioning pressure altitude reporting transponder in accordance with the CAA’s TMZ Policy Statement or to those aircraft which the aircraft commander has obtained permission from the air traffic control unit at Stansted Airport, Farnborough Radar, or Essex Radar, as may be appropriate, to enter the restricted airspace.” So it needs Mode C, not necessarily Mode S, thought the latter also incorporates mode C. However, for new installations, I believe that Surfer is right – new installations have to mode S. If not so, no doubt somebody else will be along soon, To clarify. Chris N. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Crossover table? | trailgalore | Piloting | 1 | February 15th 08 12:33 AM |
Airspeed comparison table | grubertm | Piloting | 6 | August 31st 05 11:10 PM |
diesel engines for general aviation - small comparison table | max | Home Built | 2 | August 29th 05 08:19 PM |
Help requested with Soaring Flight Software Comparison Table | Paul Remde | Soaring | 25 | September 3rd 04 07:16 AM |