![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 27, 9:34*pm, Eric Greenwell wrote:
Darryl Ramm wrote: And new motorglider depreciation can be scary - they will likely suffer significant early depreciation based on engine hours (think thousands of dollars per engine hour). So you really ought to make sure you want it especially if you buy a new one. I haven't followed the used market much, but "thousands" an hour sounds excessive for motor-based depreciation. Would pilots really think a $200,000, 3 year old glider with 10 hours on the engine is the same value as an $150,000, 3 year old glider, identical except for the 35 hours on the engine? This might be a good time to remind everyone a DG 400 or PIK 20 E will be lot cheaper than a new (or newish) ASH 26 E or DG 800, and that there are new self-launchers that cost about what a used DG 400 costs. Both Apis and Silent have several models, including electrics. -- Eric Greenwell - Washington State, USA * Change "netto" to "net" to email me directly * "A Guide to Self-launching Sailplane Operation" atwww.motorglider.org Working out depreciation costs are difficult. Afterall most sales are into a very small specialized market and values are whatever you can close a deal for and hard to keep track of. An expensive new motorglider toy might _appreciate_ if there is demand (anybody got an ASH-31Mi handy?). However since many of these mototgliders are very fussy to misshandling and engine maintenance issues I personally would devalue used motorgliders a lot if they had relatively high hours or something did not give me warm fuzzies about the previous owner(s) or people who maintained them. And I'd have no problem knocking of $k's per hour for the first few hours on a new high-end motorglider. I've looked at for people where I recommend walking away on a $150k glider because of dubious issues. Depreciated to next to not worth the hassle, well maybe some other sucker pays what is being asked. Oh and the $30k premium for an engine is not for a new ASH-26E/31Mi. You need to compare current pricing for the the ASG-29/18m to the ASH-31Mi/18m price and the difference is more significant. The old price delta on a 26/26E was around EUR 30k, that is about $45k now, but the base cost is also out of date and motorgliders often get configured with options like long range tanks etc. that add some more costs. Then buying an ASH-26 (non-motorglider) I assume you are paying extra costs for a motorglider prepared fueslage that would not encumber an ASG-29, besides people would buy the more competitive 29 over a 26 (non-motor) although maybe the 31 without motor might be fun in open-class. But as you say there are other lower costs options. Darryl |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Cost of ownership???? | Lou | Owning | 46 | March 30th 07 01:54 PM |
Cost of ownership question | Slip'er | Owning | 47 | January 3rd 05 01:35 AM |
True cost of ownership | Lou Parker | Owning | 8 | October 19th 04 11:53 PM |
cost of ownership | The Weiss Family | Owning | 74 | May 28th 04 11:58 AM |
Annual Cost of Ownership | Tom Hyslip | Owning | 6 | March 3rd 04 01:24 PM |