|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
January 12th 04, 01:43 PM
|
|||
|
|||
"Greg Hennessy" wrote in message ... On Sat, 10 Jan 2004 02:45:36 GMT, "weary" wrote: Because that's where the valid military targets were. I don't understand why you can't see that. Because in that case all that was necessary was to specify a valid military target. They did. No - they specified a target surrounded by a large urban area. I don't understand why you can't see that. However, Thats because you're too stupid to figure out that 'valid military targets' which warrant the equivalent of 250+ B29 loads being dropped upon them generally need a local population centre to facilite operations. Not necessarily. But even if they do why is necessary to mandate the obvious? 
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological achievements) | Linda Terrell | Military Aviation | 37 | January 7th 04 02:51 PM |
| Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other | B2431 | Military Aviation | 7 | December 29th 03 07:00 AM |
| Hiroshima justified? (was Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and othermagnificent technological achievements) | mrraveltay | Military Aviation | 7 | December 23rd 03 01:01 AM |
| Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent | B2431 | Military Aviation | 1 | December 20th 03 01:19 PM |
| Enola Gay: Burnt flesh and other magnificent technological | ArtKramr | Military Aviation | 19 | December 20th 03 02:47 AM |
Hybrid Mode
