Good Luck, Jim!

"sleepy6" wrote in message
...

You forget....If you make an accusation, you have the
responsibility of proving it.

I did. I told him what he has to do to prove me wrong. That was... wha
t...
2-3 weeks ago?

Lets see if I understand this....You accuse Chuck of not bringing his
truck or other items that he owns to Sun N Fun because someone might
make a legal attempt to grab it. Lots of folks see Chuck there with
his truck, trailer and airplane so now you claim Chuck doesn't own
them? Hey Chuck, who is this friend that keeps loaning you stuff for
years at a time? Will he loan me a Hawk like yours? I'll settle for
the use of a new truck for a couple of years


For the record, I've never had a truck at SnF. =8)

An attempt at humor or are you just confused agian?


Looks like Chuck explained it pretty well in his post even though he
had no obligation to explain anything. The current truck was bought
after the latest Sun N Fun. Titles to previous trucks went with the
trucks when they were sold.

Oh, of course, how could I forget that private parties and corporation
s
don't keep records of vehicles they used to own? chuckle If you bel
ieve
that you're more gullible than the rest of the RAH gaggle combined.

Well lets see, I privately have owned numerous vehicles over the
last 45 years and I have no proof at all of any but the ones I
currently drive. When I traded the others in I had to give up the
titles, nobody gave me any paperwork that proved I once owned them and
nothing requires me to keep any such proof.

My company currently has 4 trucks but over the years we have owned a
bunch. They show up on the old inventories and the old depreciation
sheets for tax purposes but the titles went with the trucks when the
trucks left.

What state lets you keep the title for a vehicle that you sold and why
would you keep that title if you could? Have you ever sold or traded
in a vehicle?


Others have posted that Chucks trucks were there along with the CGS
trailer and Chucks personal plane.

No, others have posted that they saw those things, not one of them kno
ws who
owns them.

He either owns the stuff or he has great friends that loan him stuff
for years at a time Your job would be to prove that he doesn't own
them to prove your accusation. If you could furnish that proof and
then people might take you serious.


All he has to do is post a simple title (copy of which I'm sure he has
on
file or can obtain in a few minutes with one phone call) and evidence
that
the vehicle was at SnF. It's not your job. It's his, so I'll be saying
so
long to this little sideshow thread of yours...

Juan

Thats where you are confused. It's your job to prove what you claim
and once agian all you do is spout the same nonsense and no proof. I
am giving you the perfect chance to prove your accusation and really
embarass Chuck. All you have to do is post proof that Chuck has a
reason to avoid taking his stuff to Sun N Fun. Looks to me like Chuck
makes the trip every year with his stuff and nothing has stopped him
from taking it back home.

BTW The inuendos about some females (who apparently exist only in your
imagination since you never posted anything to prove otherwise) are
entirely out of place.

It appears like you have no proof of any of your wild claims so you
just resort to insults and even wilder inuendos about his family. This
certainly did not give you any credibility so your credibility still
stands at zero. Right now it looks like you are a pathetic little worm
who is jealous of Chucks success. BS doesn't cut it. Show us
something to back up your accusations or crawl back in your hole.

In article ,
sleepy6 says...

Well lets see, I privately have owned numerous vehicles over the
last 45 years and I have no proof at all of any but the ones I
currently drive. When I traded the others in I had to give up the
titles, nobody gave me any paperwork that proved I once owned them and
nothing requires me to keep any such proof.

My company currently has 4 trucks but over the years we have owned a
bunch. They show up on the old inventories and the old depreciation
sheets for tax purposes but the titles went with the trucks when the
trucks left.

Hey Bob he knows that,that's why he says what he does. He wants me to prove the
impossible .I have no titles any more for my red Dodge Ram or my Blue one which
I traded in a couple weeks ago.So he bravely states he wants to see the titles
from the trucks I took to SnF.


What state lets you keep the title for a vehicle that you sold and why
would you keep that title if you could? Have you ever sold or traded
in a vehicle?

From the sound of it if he can't afford to put a few bucks down to prove he's
right I doubt he ever bought a new truck let alone 3 in 6 years .If he had he be
aware of how titles work.


He either owns the stuff or he has great friends that loan him stuff
for years at a time Your job would be to prove that he doesn't own
them to prove your accusation. If you could furnish that proof and
then people might take you serious.

Hey Bob I got a lot of great friends but I ain't got any that will loan me a new
truck every few years no questions asked LOL!! Let alone an airplane or a 30 '
trailer etc. Wonder if I could get those friends to pay for my booth at SnF this
year :-)



Thats where you are confused. It's your job to prove what you claim
and once agian all you do is spout the same nonsense and no proof. I
am giving you the perfect chance to prove your accusation and really
embarass Chuck. All you have to do is post proof that Chuck has a
reason to avoid taking his stuff to Sun N Fun. Looks to me like Chuck
makes the trip every year with his stuff and nothing has stopped him
from taking it back home.

....and I'll be there again next year and guess who won't be ? zoom won't be
there again. LOL!!!


BTW The inuendos about some females (who apparently exist only in your
imagination since you never posted anything to prove otherwise) are
entirely out of place.

I suppose if I did a criminal record search of all the jiminezes I'd probably
come up with a ton of names and I would also bet a lot of them are named jaun as
well. So I if I were use jauns logic against him as he does me I could say
what's the criminal charges your hiding? He's a real joke.


It appears like you have no proof of any of your wild claims so you
just resort to insults and even wilder inuendos about his family. This
certainly did not give you any credibility so your credibility still
stands at zero. Right now it looks like you are a pathetic little worm
who is jealous of Chucks success. BS doesn't cut it. Show us
something to back up your accusations or crawl back in your hole.

Your right I think envy is at the bottom of most of this .It would seem both
jaun and zoom have never got any bonified recognition for any achievements in
aviation so they try to ride on the coat tails of those who have. Either by
sucking up to them or attacking them. It gives meaning to their otherwise lack
luster lives.

See ya

Chuck

On 23 Oct 2003 05:28:52 -0700, ChuckSlusarczyk
wrote:



I suppose if I did a criminal record search of all the jiminezes I'd probably
come up with a ton of names and I would also bet a lot of them are named jaun as
well. So I if I were use jauns logic against him as he does me I could say
what's the criminal charges your hiding? He's a real joke.


See ya

Chuck


I just did a count on the Juan Jimenezs with criminal records in
Texas. 549 just in Texas. I could have saved some time though. There
were only 15 Juanitas.

By the way, anyone know what state Juan is in?

By the way, anyone know what state Juan is in?

I thought he went back to PR which was his way of weaseling out of actually flying
the BD-5, since you can't get anywhere from PR on the 5's range.

Good Luck, Jim!ZZZZZ
From: "Ron Natalie"

snip

By the way, anyone know what state Juan is in?

I thought he went back to PR which was his way of weaseling out of actually
flying the BD-5, since you can't get anywhere from PR on the 5's range.

Judging from juan's picture in the ANN website he probably wouldn't fit into a
BD-5. This could explain why he's never finished it.

Dan, U. S. Air Force, retired

"Ron Natalie" wrote in message
m...

By the way, anyone know what state Juan is in?

I thought he went back to PR which was his way of weaseling out of
actually flying
the BD-5, since you can't get anywhere from PR on the 5's range.

Speaking out your ass again, Natalie? I'm in Texas, and still working on
the -5J. Just solved the ignition issue week before last. Any other dumb
questions?

"andy asberry" wrote in message
...

By the way, anyone know what state Juan is in?


Check out the "dfw.general" newsgroup. I'd say he's in Texas.

-cj

andy asberry wrote:

By the way, anyone know what state Juan is in?

Either confusion or denial.

Dave 'futility' Hyde

....who thinks this has gotten a little out of hand.

"Dave Hyde" wrote in message
...
andy asberry wrote:

By the way, anyone know what state Juan is in?

Either confusion or denial.


Both I should imagine, he's denying that he's confused or he's
confused about what to deny. Also he would appear not to know that
this group is generally about ****ing off people about using auto
conversions or, buying latches for window glass in an airplane.
--

..
--
Cheers,
Jonathan Lowe
whatever at antispam dot net
No email address given because of spam.
Antispam trap in place


Dave 'futility' Hyde

...who thinks this has gotten a little out of hand.

In article , Dave Hyde wrote:
andy asberry wrote:

By the way, anyone know what state Juan is in?

Either confusion or denial.

*definitely* not D-nile.

One grade above that. C-nile. snicker