Some video evidences of explosives in Twin Tower collapse

On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:37:33 GMT, "Bjørnar Bolsøy" wrote:

(B2431) wrote in news:20040112005015.26088.00002571
:
From: "Bjørnar Bolsøy" am
Date: 1/11/2004 9:27 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:

No, there would be a great deal of fuel remaining. Remember that
the "explosion" would rob itself of Oxygen.

Looking at the video of the south tower impact, doesn't the huge
fireball outside the building seem to suggest that much, if not
most, of the fuel burned up on the outside?



Regards...

That fireball was nothing compared to the fireball that would have
been generated if all the fuel burned at once.

Bear in mind the fuel inside burned for a long time.

Well, according to sources I've read most of the fuel burnt up
or evaporated in less than a minute. A few minutes at most.

To me it seems that the "office fire" theory leaves enough
unanswered questions to warrant deeper studies. Not at least because
there has been serious fires in high raised steel buildings before
and none has ever caused any collapse.


Regards...

Incorrect, their have been several collapses in high-rise
fires, and remember that these buildings were struck
by jumbo jets. That has never happened to a high-rise
before.

Al Minyard