![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 16:59:37 -0600, "Gene Storey"
wrote: "Kevin Brooks" wrote "Gene Storey" wrote Please provide some evidence that US military officers intended to lose the war The war was lost, and officers are in charge of war. You might want to review the relationship between the military and the government established by the US Constitution. It was lost in 1946 when we allowed the French to decolonize. ???? We? Who is we? And, why would the French need approval from anyone other than the French people? And, if they "decolonized" in 1946, what was going on at Dien Bien Phu in 1954? http://www.lexisnexis.com/academic/2...ietnamMACV.asp What's the relevance of the link? It certainly doesn't offer any support for US military officers intending to lose. Basically, if you fly a B-52 down the same route as the previous three B-52, and do it at the same altitude, and with the same waypoints, you and whoever drew-up the operation are derelict. You might refer to Marshall Michel's excellent work, "Eleven Days of Christmas" for some insight into the relationship between SAC and the rest of the US military. Pay close attention to the command relationships. SAC was not under the operational control of MACV or 7th Air Force. Then, you might also want to check the size of the target area, the availability of offset or direct aim points for a weapons delivery, and the need to avoid collateral damage in a target area. (I might even offer you a first-person account by a POW who was moved to a cell that was immediately across the street from the Hanoi Power Plant.) Some times there are only so many ways you can approach a target. Why come down Thud Ridge every day? It points at Hanoi, it doesn't have much population and it provides radar screening from SAM sites. But, that means you go the same way every day....Yep. The fact that anyone survived is pure luck, and those that died were very brave, but very wasted (much as going over the top in the great war in the face of machine guns). The way to lose a war is to suffer casualties so great, with such waste, the people back home won't want to go, and either burn their draft cards, or joined the Reserves. But, if we count casualties, then the 58,000 names on the Wall are minor compared to the estimates of 2 to 3 million that the NVN and VC lost in the war. Whether we won or lost, suffered immense casualties or none at all, the sniveling weak sisters who burned their draft cards would still have been driven only by the desire to preserve their own worthless hides. And, you might also want to check out the number of Reserve and Guard units that served in combat in SEA and how many casualties they incurred. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed Rasimus" wrote
Why come down Thud Ridge every day? It points at Hanoi, it doesn't have much population and it provides radar screening from SAM sites. But, that means you go the same way every day....Yep. Plinking. Total waste of time. Didn't achieve anything, and akin to Germans bombing London. Big deal. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004 19:01:05 -0600, "Gene Storey"
wrote: "Ed Rasimus" wrote Why come down Thud Ridge every day? It points at Hanoi, it doesn't have much population and it provides radar screening from SAM sites. But, that means you go the same way every day....Yep. Plinking. Total waste of time. Didn't achieve anything, and akin to Germans bombing London. Big deal. Well, it was my time to waste and pretty damned exciting. If you check some tonnages delivered by the tactical forces during Rolling Thunder (that's without the truly incredible numbers added by the B-52s in Linebacker II), you'll find that we stack up quite comparably to the major Allied bombing campaigns of WW II. Exponentially greater than the "plinking" of the V-1, V-2 and light bombers of the WW II Luftwaffe. In just two days, the 29th and 30th of June, 1966, for example we destroyed 85% of the POL storage and handling facilities in the country. During most of the period we kept nearly 300,000 workers occupied along the NE and NW railroads repairing the bridges and rights of way. In LB II, during eleven days we confirmed kills on 43 SAM sites. There are other examples, but it seems that you have a pretty firmly established position on the matter. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ed Rasimus" wrote
Well, it was my time to waste and pretty damned exciting. Well, maybe you'll write a sequal: "When Thunder Stopped Rolling" The part where the Vietnamese had to clean up the mess you left, and are still trying to recover economically, while you drive your Arab Oil SUV tank to the Chinese Wal-Mart. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 13 Jan 2004 16:56:41 -0600, "Gene Storey"
wrote: "Ed Rasimus" wrote Well, it was my time to waste and pretty damned exciting. Well, maybe you'll write a sequal: "When Thunder Stopped Rolling" The part where the Vietnamese had to clean up the mess you left, and are still trying to recover economically, while you drive your Arab Oil SUV tank to the Chinese Wal-Mart. I've got no regrets. The Vietnamese "mess" seems much more closely related to Marxist economics and revolutionary rhetoric than anything we did. The sequel right now is titled "Palace Cobra: Fascination With a War", but that might change. It deals with going to the same targets in the F-4 five years after the first tour, primarily because of the efforts of those you seem to idolize who burned their draft cards and stayed home. Today in Vietnam, the economy is booming, tourism is rampant, immigration is open (I encountered several Vietnamese students on campus last semester who coincidentally were born in 1975, the year the Saigon government fell.) As for "Arab Oil SUV tank," I drive an Infiniti coupe and my wife drives a Toyota. We get good gas mileage. I became disenamoured of "Yank Tanks" during the years I lived in Europe. I don't shop at Wal-Mart, but I often suggest my classes look at clothing labels in their local Wal-Mart as a clear indication that American free enterprise is succeeding in undermining the Marxist utopia in China. You seem to be heavily into sloganeering, innuendo, stereotyping and simplistic interpretation of events which you don't demonstrate a clear understanding of. Ed Rasimus Fighter Pilot (USAF-Ret) "When Thunder Rolled" Smithsonian Institution Press ISBN #1-58834-103-8 |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ed Rasimus wrote:
"Gene Storey" wrote: Well, maybe you'll write a sequal: "When Thunder Stopped Rolling" The part where the Vietnamese had to clean up the mess you left, and are still trying to recover economically, while you drive your Arab Oil SUV tank to the Chinese Wal-Mart. I've got no regrets. The Vietnamese "mess" seems much more closely related to Marxist economics and revolutionary rhetoric than anything we did. Well said. And we didn't "lose" the war, per se. IIRC, we left the South Vietnamese with the third largest air force in the world (larger than the RAF, the post-war Luftwaffe, the Armée de l'air, etc.) but the South Vietnamese simply didn't want to fight for their_own_country! The sequel right now is titled "Palace Cobra: Fascination With a War", but that might change. Howzabout "Air War in Shangri-la?" ![]() It deals with going to the same targets in the F-4 five years after the first tour, primarily because of the efforts of those you seem to idolize who burned their draft cards and stayed home. That, and the efforts of our politicians, of course. Today in Vietnam, the economy is booming, tourism is rampant, immigration is open (I encountered several Vietnamese students on campus last semester who coincidentally were born in 1975, the year the Saigon government fell.) Exactly right. (Coca Cola is the beverage of choice in Vietnam these days, no?) As for "Arab Oil SUV tank," I drive an Infiniti coupe and my wife drives a Toyota. We get good gas mileage. I became disenamoured of "Yank Tanks" during the years I lived in Europe. I don't shop at Wal-Mart, but I often suggest my classes look at clothing labels in their local Wal-Mart as a clear indication that American free enterprise is succeeding in undermining the Marxist utopia in China. Speaking of which, I hold a valid Class "A" CDL (e.g: 80,000 lbs. GVWR) w/tanker and hazmat endorsements. If these SUV's and "Yank Tanks" get any bigger than they already are, my next "car" is gonna be a nice Peterbilt or Freightliner with a 500 hp Cat diesel and Rockwell Super-10 tranny (e.g: die you all you SUV pukes! ![]() You seem to be heavily into sloganeering, innuendo, stereotyping and simplistic interpretation of events which you don't demonstrate a clear understanding of. Sometimes Gene comes up with some amusing (and damn plausible) stuff, but I've also detected quite a lot of bitterness and anger in his posts that is somewhat disconcerting. In any event, getting back to the topic of the importance of stealth, I'm sure glad that they can't see my bird on radar since my "stealthiness" enables me to operate it like both an airplane AND an ultralight (e.g: the best of both worlds). Is this a great country, or what! ![]() |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mike Marron" wrote
...the South Vietnamese simply didn't want to fight for their_own_country! South Vietnam was designed in Washington DC. It was a fake country. The Vietnamese fought for their country and terminated the American hegemony. Sometimes Gene comes up with some amusing (and damn plausible) stuff, but I've also detected quite a lot of bitterness and anger in his posts that is somewhat disconcerting. With only 30% of Americans turning out to vote, I am convinced that we will be bankrupt by 2010, and all we will have is 1500 Nukes, no oil, and Argentina's default will have been a carnival in comparison. Unlike my grandfather, I don't plan to starve in a hobo camp, and have enough ammunition to see me through the first two adjustments. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike, don't kid yourself that you can't be seen on AI radar. I have
picked up geese at 7 miles on my F86D X-band (10ghz)radar off Okinawa way back in 1956. Our GCI radar picked them up coming inbound and asked me to check out the track. I was quite surprised when I closed in on the target and discovered it was a flock of 7 geese heading for Japan about 30 miles east of the southern tip of Okinawa. You are about 75% water and Xband resonates with the water molecules - so you will show up as a radar target. Walt BJ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ut the South Vietnamese simply didn't want to fight for
their_own_country! and for their democratically elected,non corrupt government!. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gene Storey" wrote in message news:MI_Mb.98$ce2.93@okepread03... "Ed Rasimus" wrote Well, it was my time to waste and pretty damned exciting. Well, maybe you'll write a sequal: "When Thunder Stopped Rolling" The part where the Vietnamese had to clean up the mess you left, and are still trying to recover economically, while you drive your Arab Oil SUV tank to the Chinese Wal-Mart. If you want to be up to date you'd better make it the one about the Vietnamese struggle to encourage US investment in their country after 25 years of communism have impoverished it. As the official Vietnamese Government website reported Quote in January 2004, a delegation from numerous leading companies of the US in many fields as General Electric, Lockheed Martins, and American Global Resources. will come to Vietnam looking for investment opportunities. Finding market with greater interest as the above is active signal of starting investment into Vietnam from the US, the experts predicted. With journey of the US enterprises to Vietnam in January 2004, several investment projects with billions dollars expected to be signed. /Quote That whirring sound in the background is Uncle Ho spinning in his grave. Keith |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stealth homebuilt | C J Campbell | Home Built | 1 | September 15th 04 08:43 AM |
SURVEY on manuals - most important for builders, but never good?? | T-Online | Home Built | 0 | January 23rd 04 04:37 PM |
F-32 vs F-35 | The Raven | Military Aviation | 60 | January 17th 04 08:36 PM |
How long until current 'stealth' techniques are compromised? | muskau | Military Aviation | 38 | January 5th 04 04:27 AM |
Israeli Stealth??? | Kenneth Williams | Military Aviation | 92 | October 22nd 03 04:28 PM |