![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have a Form One for both my radio and transponder.
/Robert John Smith skrev: jcarlyle wrote: First, it appears to this US pilot that one of the uses of a Form One is to certify that a new part is airworthy, with the basis for airworthiness being that the part was made in accordance with a TSO or some other approved technical specification. Is this correct? Roughly said, yes. EASA Form 1 ist the exact equivalent of the FAA Form 8130–3, it even has the same blocks. (And EASA honors FAA 8130-3 forms.) Second, why would a plane made in Europe not have a Form One for all installed equipment? Form 1 (or an equivalent certificate) is only required for required equipment. I'm not sure how transponders, radios and ELTs are handled because they are not required but must be approved somehow. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Air Force Form 181? | Yossarian | Piloting | 7 | April 16th 05 06:00 AM |
Request for a 337 form | MC | Soaring | 12 | March 11th 05 03:56 AM |
FAA form 337? | Paul Lee | Home Built | 15 | February 1st 04 07:17 PM |
Mylar "form 1" vs "form 2" | John | Soaring | 1 | November 27th 03 01:20 AM |
Mig-29 questions & general aviation questions 2003 | Steven | Military Aviation | 1 | October 20th 03 06:06 AM |