![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Alan Baker wrote:
No one understands "suction" to actually mean a pulling force. Remember folks: no more talk of sucking soda through a straw! Just suck it up! ... don't pretend that there is a force acting upward on the surface of the liquid inside the straw... ...because you'll be wrong. You still don't get it Alan. This level of attention to minutiae is impressive in Junior High science classes, and paradoxically is quite correct but trivial. Get over it. Just so you can savor the general idea - let me phrase the general concept so it won't trip your OC reaction: In the general case, two thirds of the lift provided by a wing is due to the depression over the upper surface - (actually towards the front...) and a third due to the air flow over the lower surface. THERE. Are you happy now? Brian W |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
brian whatcott wrote: Alan Baker wrote: No one understands "suction" to actually mean a pulling force. Remember folks: no more talk of sucking soda through a straw! Just suck it up! ... don't pretend that there is a force acting upward on the surface of the liquid inside the straw... ...because you'll be wrong. You still don't get it Alan. This level of attention to minutiae is impressive in Junior High science classes, and paradoxically is quite correct but trivial. Get over it. Just so you can savor the general idea - let me phrase the general concept so it won't trip your OC reaction: In the general case, two thirds of the lift provided by a wing is due to the depression over the upper surface - (actually towards the front...) and a third due to the air flow over the lower surface. THERE. Are you happy now? Brian W I was happy to begin with. Read my initial reply: "Ummmm... It sort of depends what you mean. If you mean that suction is actually providing an upward force, you're quite mistaken. If you mean that the difference in pressure between upper and lower surfaces is 2/3 the result of lower pressure on the upper surface, then you might be right. I don't know." You see, I never had any problem sorting out the "minutiae" from the important. But a whole bunch of people (well, *some* people) jumped in and certainly made statements that they actually believe the air was pulling up on the wing. -- Alan Baker Vancouver, British Columbia http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Pressure Distribution Charts | sisu1a | Soaring | 0 | September 21st 08 05:53 PM |
Soundwaves Boost Wing Lift | [email protected] | Home Built | 30 | September 5th 05 10:21 PM |
747 weight distribution | Robin | General Aviation | 25 | June 22nd 05 03:53 AM |
Distribution of armor on a B-52 | B2431 | Military Aviation | 12 | August 16th 04 09:07 PM |
Alternator load distribution in a Baron | Viperdoc | Owning | 7 | December 9th 03 10:27 PM |