![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
cavelamb schreef:
jan olieslagers wrote: And also, less poignant but still: How do I calculate from the basic parameters the behaviour of the profile, i.e. the Cl curves? And perhaps other nice info like the leading edge diameter? Generally: any pointers to in-depth information that a non-engineer can mentally digest? TIA, Jan, I'd not think the CL and CD curves can be "calculated" from the airfoil shape very easily. Those, and other behaviors, are usually derived from wind tunnel testing. Having said that, I'd not be too surprised to find someone has written a program that approximates CL/CD from a database of some kind. Anyway, question... Are you trying to plot the airfoil shape from a table of ordinates? Or are you trying to generate a shape from a mathematical algorythm? My idea was to first plot a lot of ordinates through an algoritm, then plot the airfoil around these. But it seems there is so much good work already done that I'd be reinventing the wheel. I'll have to study all the links given here, that'll take some doing to begin with. But I did have understood the airfoil's behaviour could be calculated from the parameters that describe its form - wrong assumption, apparently. Thank you! KA |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Calculations for Flying | javawizard | Piloting | 11 | October 18th 07 05:22 PM |
NACA Numbers??? | c hinds | Home Built | 3 | October 11th 04 09:40 PM |
NACA Chord Balance point | [email protected] | Rotorcraft | 3 | April 27th 04 06:05 AM |
Reverse NACA duct | Chris W | Home Built | 22 | October 28th 03 10:59 PM |
NACA duct ventrui | Chris W | Home Built | 7 | October 27th 03 04:11 PM |