A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Home Built
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 9th 09, 07:27 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Alan Baker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 244
Default visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing

In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:

And your comparing an Airframe & Power instructor to a Ph.D. in
Aeronautics...

LOL
I didn't compare him to anyone.


Yes, you did. You suggest that since an A&P instructor could


Would.

have some misconceptions about physics that a Ph.D. in Aeronautics would as
well.


Could as well.

You made "could" and "would" switch positions. Not by accident. You're
simply dishonest.


LOL

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg
  #2  
Old December 10th 09, 04:37 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Beryl[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 52
Default visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing

Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:

And your comparing an Airframe & Power instructor to a Ph.D. in
Aeronautics...

LOL
I didn't compare him to anyone.
Yes, you did. You suggest that since an A&P instructor could

Would.

have some misconceptions about physics that a Ph.D. in Aeronautics would as
well.

Could as well.

You made "could" and "would" switch positions. Not by accident. You're
simply dishonest.


LOL


Step-by-step now, just for Alan.

A = An A&P guy is a dummy
B = A PhD guy could be a dummy as well


A and B
That's it, my statement.


if A then B
A, therefore B
That's your understanding of it.
  #3  
Old December 10th 09, 04:51 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Beryl[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 52
Default visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing

Beryl wrote:
Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:

And your comparing an Airframe & Power instructor to a
Ph.D. in Aeronautics...

LOL
I didn't compare him to anyone.
Yes, you did. You suggest that since an A&P instructor could
Would.

have some misconceptions about physics that a Ph.D. in
Aeronautics would as well.
Could as well.

You made "could" and "would" switch positions. Not by accident.
You're simply dishonest.


LOL


Step-by-step now, just for Alan.


No, it's worse than I thought.


A = An A&P guy is a dummy
B = A PhD guy could be a dummy as well

C = An A&P guy could be a dummy
D = A PhD guy is a dummy

A and B That's it, my statement.



if C then D
C therefore D
That's your understanding of it.

  #4  
Old December 10th 09, 05:01 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Alan Baker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 244
Default visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing

In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Beryl wrote:
Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:

And your comparing an Airframe & Power instructor to a
Ph.D. in Aeronautics...

LOL
I didn't compare him to anyone.
Yes, you did. You suggest that since an A&P instructor could
Would.

have some misconceptions about physics that a Ph.D. in
Aeronautics would as well.
Could as well.

You made "could" and "would" switch positions. Not by accident.
You're simply dishonest.

LOL


Step-by-step now, just for Alan.


No, it's worse than I thought.


A = An A&P guy is a dummy
B = A PhD guy could be a dummy as well

C = An A&P guy could be a dummy
D = A PhD guy is a dummy

A and B That's it, my statement.



if C then D
C therefore D
That's your understanding of it.


LOL

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg
  #5  
Old December 10th 09, 05:01 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Alan Baker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 244
Default visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing

In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:

And your comparing an Airframe & Power instructor to a Ph.D. in
Aeronautics...

LOL
I didn't compare him to anyone.
Yes, you did. You suggest that since an A&P instructor could
Would.

have some misconceptions about physics that a Ph.D. in Aeronautics would
as
well.
Could as well.

You made "could" and "would" switch positions. Not by accident. You're
simply dishonest.


LOL


Step-by-step now, just for Alan.

A = An A&P guy is a dummy


An A&P is uninformed in an area outside is area of training and
expertise.

B = A PhD guy could be a dummy as well


But you think that a Ph.D. in aeronautics doesn't understand...

....aeronautics.



A and B
That's it, my statement.


if A then B
A, therefore B
That's your understanding of it.


Nope.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg
  #6  
Old December 10th 09, 06:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Beryl[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 52
Default visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing

Alan Baker wrote:

An A&P is uninformed in an area outside is area of training and
expertise.


The examples (other than chloroform in grass) were well inside his area
of training. He holds an A&P Certificate. It's FAA test material. The
stuff he goofs up on is the stuff that he's teaching A&P students. You
want your airplane repaired by someone who narrowly squeaked by his
exams with a 70% score?

And the Navy didn't do any better with him.

So, just like A&P Master Instructors, and their students, and their
students on down the line, the Ph.D.s among us may be every bit as good
as those they learned from.
  #7  
Old December 10th 09, 06:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Alan Baker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 244
Default visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing

In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:

An A&P is uninformed in an area outside is area of training and
expertise.


The examples (other than chloroform in grass) were well inside his area
of training. He holds an A&P Certificate. It's FAA test material. The
stuff he goofs up on is the stuff that he's teaching A&P students. You
want your airplane repaired by someone who narrowly squeaked by his
exams with a 70% score?


You really are a ninny aren't you? Learning about chloroform as it
pertains to aircraft doesn't teach you a thing about plants and what
they actually contain.


And the Navy didn't do any better with him.

So, just like A&P Master Instructors, and their students, and their
students on down the line, the Ph.D.s among us may be every bit as good
as those they learned from.


This is about you suggesting that because you once knew an A&P
instructor who spouted off a lot of foolishness outside his areas of
training and expertise, that therefore a Ph.D. in aeronautics won't
(alright "might not") understand aeronautics.

And it's laughable.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg
  #8  
Old December 10th 09, 07:09 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Beryl[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 52
Default visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing

Alan Baker wrote:
In article , Beryl
wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:

An A&P is uninformed in an area outside is area of training and
expertise.

The examples (other than chloroform in grass) were well inside

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

Dip**** focuses on chloroform:

You really are a ninny aren't you? Learning about chloroform as it
pertains to aircraft

  #9  
Old December 10th 09, 09:43 AM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Alan Baker
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 244
Default visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing

In article ,
Beryl wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:
In article , Beryl
wrote:

Alan Baker wrote:

An A&P is uninformed in an area outside is area of training and
expertise.
The examples (other than chloroform in grass) were well inside

^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^

Dip**** focuses on chloroform:

You really are a ninny aren't you? Learning about chloroform as it
pertains to aircraft


Names for layers of the atmosphere is not something that one would need
to learn as an A&P, nor is it important to know what happens to a gas as
it is compressed.

None of your examples were of a person making basic mistakes *within*
his area of expertise.

--
Alan Baker
Vancouver, British Columbia
http://gallery.me.com/alangbaker/100008/DSCF0162/web.jpg
  #10  
Old December 10th 09, 06:42 PM posted to rec.aviation.homebuilt
Steve Hix[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 50
Default visualisation of the lift distribution over a wing

Alan Baker wrote:

An A&P is uninformed in an area outside is area of training and
expertise.


That's a remarkably ignorant statement Alan; you can't possibly know
what areas of information any given individual might or might not have
studied and mastered in addition to earning an A&P rating.

Backpedalling and trying to save yourself by holding up "...is area of
training and expertise...", by the way, won't help you here. You're the
one who circumscribed your argument by limiting it to holders of an A&P
rating, and by implication that they understand nothing outside that
area.

You're not dealing here with sociopath trolls infesting a computer
advocacy newsgroup, you can't slide by with the same sort of
intellectually limp and limited argumentation.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pressure Distribution Charts sisu1a Soaring 0 September 21st 08 05:53 PM
Soundwaves Boost Wing Lift [email protected] Home Built 30 September 5th 05 10:21 PM
747 weight distribution Robin General Aviation 25 June 22nd 05 03:53 AM
Distribution of armor on a B-52 B2431 Military Aviation 12 August 16th 04 09:07 PM
Alternator load distribution in a Baron Viperdoc Owning 7 December 9th 03 10:27 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.