![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Mxsmanic wrote: A nice story, but these pilots still need to find a new line of work. If any one of a great many possible factors had been different, those pilots and everyone on board their aircraft would be dead. Sorry, but they don't deserve any slack at all. It's time for a change of career--something in which flipping to the wrong frequency or chatting over laptops for an hour won't put lives at risk. Please elaborate. Offhand, I can't think of any change which would have killed people here. Resulted in an emergency landing somewhere other than their intended destination, perhaps, but no deaths. According to this story, the pilots were awake and aware, and would have eventually started wondering where they were and why ATC hadn't talked to them yet. They would have been able to quickly figure out their actual location, and start talking to the appropriate people once they did. They would have then been directed to an airport in that area that could handle their plane. A worse outcome, certainly, but I don't see any risk to life here. -- Mike Ash Radio Free Earth Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:05:27 +0800, Mike Ash wrote:
In article , Mxsmanic wrote: A nice story, but these pilots still need to find a new line of work. If any one of a great many possible factors had been different, those pilots and everyone on board their aircraft would be dead. Sorry, but they don't deserve any slack at all. It's time for a change of career--something in which flipping to the wrong frequency or chatting over laptops for an hour won't put lives at risk. Please elaborate. Offhand, I can't think of any change which would have killed people here. Resulted in an emergency landing somewhere other than their intended destination, perhaps, but no deaths. According to this story, the pilots were awake and aware, and would have eventually started wondering where they were and why ATC hadn't talked to them yet. They would have been able to quickly figure out their actual location, and start talking to the appropriate people once they did. They would have then been directed to an airport in that area that could handle their plane. A worse outcome, certainly, but I don't see any risk to life here. Mike, you're responding to the Mx-Bloss troll, it makes you look like an ass. Stop. -- Mark inventor/artist/pilot/guitarist/scientist/philosopher/ scratch golfer/cat wrangler and observer of the mundane. And much much more including wealthy beyond anything you can imagine. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Ash writes:
Please elaborate. Offhand, I can't think of any change which would have killed people here. Fuel exhaustion, weather, system failures (pressurization, engines, you name it), and so on. If you want to fly on airplanes with pilots who are asleep at the switch, that's your choice, but I don't. According to this story, the pilots were awake and aware, and would have eventually started wondering where they were and why ATC hadn't talked to them yet. When is "eventually"? They were awake, but completely unaware. Had the FA not asked them when they would be landing, how much longer would it have taken them to figure out that there was a problem? They spent more than an hour goofing off without noticing anything. They would have been able to quickly figure out their actual location, and start talking to the appropriate people once they did. They would have then been directed to an airport in that area that could handle their plane. A worse outcome, certainly, but I don't see any risk to life here. Well, in a couple of years, they can get their PPLs again, and then you can fly with them. They don't belong in an airline cockpit. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Mxsmanic wrote: Mike Ash writes: Please elaborate. Offhand, I can't think of any change which would have killed people here. Fuel exhaustion, weather, system failures (pressurization, engines, you name it), and so on. If you want to fly on airplanes with pilots who are asleep at the switch, that's your choice, but I don't. Should have known better than to talk to you. Did I ever say I wanted to fly on airplanes with pilots who are asleep at the switch? No, I did not. Do not put words in my mouth. If you feel like addressing what I actually say rather than making **** up, let me know. -- Mike Ash Radio Free Earth Broadcasting from our climate-controlled studios deep inside the Moon |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike Ash writes:
Should have known better than to talk to you. Did I ever say I wanted to fly on airplanes with pilots who are asleep at the switch? No, I did not. You imply that there actions put no one in any real danger, therefore there is no reason why you wouldn't want them as your pilots, since there's nothing that they've done that would put you in any real danger if they did it again. Either you have a problem with the way they conducted themselves, or you don't. If you do, then logically you wouldn't want to fly with them. If you don't, then logically you wouldn't mind flying with them. I have a problem with their conduct, and so I would not want to have them piloting any aircraft on which I might be a passenger. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
remember, one way or another you are talking to a village idiot, and that is
part of the problem. -- Jim in NC |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 23, 9:35*am, "Morgans" wrote:
remember, one way or another you are talking to a village idiot, and that is part of the problem. -- Jim in NC Hey Jim..... Merry Christmas sir...... Ben www.haaspowerair.com |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote Hey Jim..... Merry Christmas sir...... And to you, Ben. It so happens that this Christmas I get to spend most of my time in bed. Seems as though I decided to get a case of Pneumonia, a couple days ago. I get out of breath, just standing up long enough to take a shower to blow the stink off. That's tough for me to get used to, but I'll adapt until I get better, I guess. You do what you can to get some air time for me, and keep that pretty blue and orange bird in the sky, OK? So until we meet again, Merry Christmas from North Carolina! -- Jim in NC |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 22:15:47 +0800, Mike Ash wrote:
In article , Mxsmanic wrote: Mike Ash writes: Please elaborate. Offhand, I can't think of any change which would have killed people here. Fuel exhaustion, weather, system failures (pressurization, engines, you name it), and so on. If you want to fly on airplanes with pilots who are asleep at the switch, that's your choice, but I don't. Should have known better than to talk to you. So much for having brains, GliderBoi. -- http://www.tronguy.net (Yeppers, that's me!!) http://current.com/items/88931310_tron_guy |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
National Seashore/bird sanctuary overflight altitudes? | TonyR | Piloting | 2 | November 18th 06 11:13 PM |
Grand Canyon overflight proposal | john smith | Piloting | 71 | April 23rd 06 05:30 AM |
Niagara Falls overflight | Bartscher | Piloting | 8 | May 31st 04 09:31 PM |
Canada overflight question | SeeAndAvoid | Piloting | 15 | February 1st 04 10:00 PM |