A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hercules Engines



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old January 17th 04, 03:52 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

Hey, Splaps. Next time you are ever near a DADC or it's diagram,
check out what they have at the other end of the tubing connected
to the fitting labeled *TOTAL*. Only ONE pitot tube!


Yep, the term Total means they added two sensors.

Catch this, Jimmy:

Since you started your childishness, you have trolled up three different
groups, with pretty much the same results.

Do you remember that old Gulf Aero DER that hung around in the pilot's
groups? Well, he read your stuff and got so stupid they fired him.

Next some poor tech at BF Goodrich got trolled up and removed the
temperature probe from the HS-125 700 ADC-80 changes. That cost them
hundreds of thousands of dollars in customer relations money.

And third, but not least, you trolled up Dudley and Shafer. Well wouldn't
you know, once Dudley got a conspiracy going with Mary's friends at Dryden,
the system **** out the two civil service slots and told Dryden to create a
basis for their funding. Well you know, those Dryden folks knew full well
they were making a living off someone else's past, but they hadn't realized
some of the people's work they made their living off of were contemporaries.
So old Ken Peterson, a personal friend of Dudley's, sat about and did not
create any basis, so now they have lost 1/3 of their budget. (ie $40million)

So, Jimmy, when I call your work an idiot detector, I really mean it.

Your's is a much nicer archive troll, as Miller is completely clueless about
the subject.


  #2  
Old January 17th 04, 07:04 PM
Jim Knoyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

Hey, Splaps. Next time you are ever near a DADC or it's diagram,
check out what they have at the other end of the tubing connected
to the fitting labeled *TOTAL*. Only ONE pitot tube!


Yep, the term Total means they added two sensors.

Nope, the pitot tube detects static pressure + impact pressure.
Read the book(s).

[ snip of nonsense ]

So, Jimmy, when I call your work an idiot detector, I really mean it.

As others have noticed, it never fails to attract you. :-)

Your's is a much nicer archive troll, as Miller is completely clueless

about
the subject.

Thanks, I'll take that as a compliment.
For anyone who missed it:
http://home.att.net/~j.knoyle/the_ta...hronicles.html

Jimmy



  #3  
Old January 17th 04, 07:24 PM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

Hey, Splaps. Next time you are ever near a DADC or it's diagram,
check out what they have at the other end of the tubing connected
to the fitting labeled *TOTAL*. Only ONE pitot tube!


Yep, the term Total means they added two sensors.

Nope, the pitot tube detects static pressure + impact pressure.
Read the book(s).


I have been writing that to you for years, Knoyle. That is why you seem
such an idiot when you insist a pitot port is a pitot tube.

Total means there is more than one sensor, nothing more.


  #4  
Old January 17th 04, 09:48 PM
Jim Knoyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

Hey, Splaps. Next time you are ever near a DADC or it's diagram,
check out what they have at the other end of the tubing connected
to the fitting labeled *TOTAL*. Only ONE pitot tube!

Yep, the term Total means they added two sensors.

Nope, the pitot tube detects static pressure + impact pressure.
Read the book(s).


I have been writing that to you for years, Knoyle. That is why you seem
such an idiot when you insist a pitot port is a pitot tube.

Total means there is more than one sensor, nothing more.

You really don't understand how that one little opening on the end
of that pointy thing up front can detect static pressure (altitude)
as well as impact pressure (airspeed), do you. That's sad!



  #6  
Old January 18th 04, 02:00 AM
Jim Knoyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Jim Knoyle"
Date: 1/17/2004 3:48 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

Hey, Splaps. Next time you are ever near a DADC or it's diagram,
check out what they have at the other end of the tubing connected
to the fitting labeled *TOTAL*. Only ONE pitot tube!

Yep, the term Total means they added two sensors.

Nope, the pitot tube detects static pressure + impact pressure.
Read the book(s).

I have been writing that to you for years, Knoyle. That is why you

seem
such an idiot when you insist a pitot port is a pitot tube.

Total means there is more than one sensor, nothing more.

You really don't understand how that one little opening on the end
of that pointy thing up front can detect static pressure (altitude)
as well as impact pressure (airspeed), do you. That's sad!


The hole on the front only detects pitot pressure. If there are holes on

the
side are for detecting static pressure.


No, sorry Dan, you'll have to refer to a more modern air data computer.
When the label at the top of the ADC switched from pitot to total, the
definition for Total Pressure (Pt) was given as:
"This is a pressure input (from the aircraft pitot probe) which varies
both with altitude and aircraft speed. (Range 3.11 to 42.50 in. Hg.)"
*This was a direct quote from a Honeywell HG280D DADC guide*
The book goes on to explain how the delta Ps is removed to arrive at
a more accurate airspeed. The Ps, whether obtained from the static
port(s) on the probe or flush mounted ports on the fuselage, is fed
through another fitting on the DADC (labeled static) and is something
else entirely. It does factor in to the math.

JK


  #7  
Old January 18th 04, 04:13 AM
B2431
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

From: "Jim Knoyle"
Date: 1/17/2004 8:00 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"B2431" wrote in message
...
From: "Jim Knoyle"

Date: 1/17/2004 3:48 PM Central Standard Time
Message-id:


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

Hey, Splaps. Next time you are ever near a DADC or it's diagram,
check out what they have at the other end of the tubing connected
to the fitting labeled *TOTAL*. Only ONE pitot tube!

Yep, the term Total means they added two sensors.

Nope, the pitot tube detects static pressure + impact pressure.
Read the book(s).

I have been writing that to you for years, Knoyle. That is why you

seem
such an idiot when you insist a pitot port is a pitot tube.

Total means there is more than one sensor, nothing more.

You really don't understand how that one little opening on the end
of that pointy thing up front can detect static pressure (altitude)
as well as impact pressure (airspeed), do you. That's sad!


The hole on the front only detects pitot pressure. If there are holes on

the
side are for detecting static pressure.


No, sorry Dan, you'll have to refer to a more modern air data computer.
When the label at the top of the ADC switched from pitot to total, the
definition for Total Pressure (Pt) was given as:
"This is a pressure input (from the aircraft pitot probe) which varies
both with altitude and aircraft speed. (Range 3.11 to 42.50 in. Hg.)"
*This was a direct quote from a Honeywell HG280D DADC guide*
The book goes on to explain how the delta Ps is removed to arrive at
a more accurate airspeed. The Ps, whether obtained from the static
port(s) on the probe or flush mounted ports on the fuselage, is fed
through another fitting on the DADC (labeled static) and is something
else entirely. It does factor in to the math.

JK

OK, I see where you are coming from. The pitot pressure DOES vary by altitude.
To compensate for that when measuring airspeed you use static pressure to give
you altitude. Some aircraft detect static pressure from holes on the side of
the pitot tube and others have the static ports located elswhere.

I would be interested in seeing a schematic of your aircraft's pitot-static
systems including DADC. I have never worked on DADC. I did work on the CADC
abomination on the F-4E.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired
  #8  
Old January 18th 04, 06:49 AM
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Knoyle" wrote:




No, sorry Dan, you'll have to refer to a more modern air data computer.
When the label at the top of the ADC switched from pitot to total, the
definition for Total Pressure (Pt) was given as:
"This is a pressure input (from the aircraft pitot probe) which varies
both with altitude and aircraft speed. (Range 3.11 to 42.50 in. Hg.)"
*This was a direct quote from a Honeywell HG280D DADC guide*
The book goes on to explain how the delta Ps is removed to arrive at
a more accurate airspeed. The Ps, whether obtained from the static
port(s) on the probe or flush mounted ports on the fuselage, is fed
through another fitting on the DADC (labeled static) and is something
else entirely. It does factor in to the math.

JK

Hang on here a second now Jim, you still need two samples. As Dan
says you need 'static pressure' to read the altitude from and you
need 'pitot pressure' (ram air pressure) as well as the static
pressure to derive the airspeed reading from. Sounds like you're
saying that you can read 'both' from just the 'ram air pressure'
alone. Or did I misunderstand you?

I'm sure that you know that lots of pitot tubes have both a
static port (flush mount on the side) and a 'ram air port' the
hole in the front to collect 'pitot pressure'.
--

-Gord.
  #9  
Old January 19th 04, 07:44 PM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message ...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

Hey, Splaps. Next time you are ever near a DADC or it's diagram,
check out what they have at the other end of the tubing connected
to the fitting labeled *TOTAL*. Only ONE pitot tube!

Yep, the term Total means they added two sensors.

Nope, the pitot tube detects static pressure + impact pressure.
Read the book(s).


I have been writing that to you for years, Knoyle. That is why you seem
such an idiot when you insist a pitot port is a pitot tube.

Total means there is more than one sensor, nothing more.

You really don't understand how that one little opening on the end
of that pointy thing up front can detect static pressure (altitude)
as well as impact pressure (airspeed), do you. That's sad!



you mean the mud wasp home surely ?
  #10  
Old January 19th 04, 07:45 PM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message ...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

Hey, Splaps. Next time you are ever near a DADC or it's diagram,
check out what they have at the other end of the tubing connected
to the fitting labeled *TOTAL*. Only ONE pitot tube!

Yep, the term Total means they added two sensors.

Nope, the pitot tube detects static pressure + impact pressure.
Read the book(s).


I have been writing that to you for years, Knoyle. That is why you seem
such an idiot when you insist a pitot port is a pitot tube.

Total means there is more than one sensor, nothing more.

You really don't understand how that one little opening on the end
of that pointy thing up front can detect static pressure (altitude)
as well as impact pressure (airspeed), do you. That's sad!



you mean the mud wasp home surely ?
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch Paul Home Built 0 October 18th 04 10:14 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 April 5th 04 03:04 PM
Hercules Engines Tarver Engineering Home Built 0 January 19th 04 11:05 PM
Accident Statistics: Certified vs. Non-Certified Engines Ron Wanttaja Home Built 23 January 18th 04 05:36 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.