![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "robert arndt" He's not talking about that design is he? Stick to the subject will you? There is a reference to a twin Hurricane built from two crashed aircraft parts with a new wing section and new engines. It was designated a non-official N2368 and only one was built, used mostly for testing but initially to meet an RAF specification. Eventually, it was scrapped. The information comes from the Feb 1999 issue of IPMS in a 4 page article by Paul Lloyd. It was for a twin-hurricane model and there is one historic poor-quality photo of N2368 included. I have never seen the photo since the magazine was from the UK but that is where the information comes from. Maybe you can still buy it? Sounds like Jim's friend is a modeler and gets his WW2 info from those sources. Rob Rob, that was an April Fool article in IPMS. TJ |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"TJ" wrote in message ...
"robert arndt" He's not talking about that design is he? Stick to the subject will you? There is a reference to a twin Hurricane built from two crashed aircraft parts with a new wing section and new engines. It was designated a non-official N2368 and only one was built, used mostly for testing but initially to meet an RAF specification. Eventually, it was scrapped. The information comes from the Feb 1999 issue of IPMS in a 4 page article by Paul Lloyd. It was for a twin-hurricane model and there is one historic poor-quality photo of N2368 included. I have never seen the photo since the magazine was from the UK but that is where the information comes from. Maybe you can still buy it? Sounds like Jim's friend is a modeler and gets his WW2 info from those sources. Rob Rob, that was an April Fool article in IPMS. TJ Thanks TJ... but Keith was still talking about the Hillson FH40 Slip-Wing Hurricane and not the twin- Hurricane the origianl poster inquired about. I do not assume anything about the twin-Hurricane. I only posted where Jim's friend probably got the info from- erroneous or not. But why would a Feb issue of a modeling mag have an April fool article in it? As stated in my reply I never saw the photo nor purchased the issue. I have heard about it but that is not the only source. A while ago, maybe in one of my older archived posts at RAM or the WW2 NG, there was similar talk of the twin-Hurricane. IIRC, an RAF test facility was mentioned but I can't remember what it was. There, supposedly was tested a few rare experimental Hurricanes. I distinctly remeber one open cockpit type that was used for taxi training that had an instructor seat bolted to one wing! You won't find a pic for that one I bet. Anyway, it was a real aircraft claimed by many pilots and noted in references to that RAF test facility. So, maybe the aircraft was built or maybe not. The slip-wing Hurricane definate was but can you find a photo of it? I can't. Rob p.s. Here's a pic of a German captured Hurricane: http://www.fleetairarmarchive.net/Ai...zicaptured.jpg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ | John | Home Built | 4 | November 10th 04 01:45 PM |
Stupid Americans! -- Stupid... Stupid... STUPID!!! __________-+__ihuvpe | john smith | Instrument Flight Rules | 1 | November 9th 04 03:50 AM |
Stupid question about flight testing and "the envelope" | Scott Ferrin | Military Aviation | 12 | January 7th 04 03:56 AM |
Stupid hp to thrust question | Mark | Home Built | 52 | December 9th 03 01:41 PM |
Stupid super cub question | Robert Loer | Home Built | 9 | November 22nd 03 05:28 PM |