![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 3:21*pm, Westbender wrote:
On Feb 20, 11:43*am, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Feb 20, 9:10*am, kd6veb wrote: Hi Gang * This thread prompted me to think as to how the MXR unit ignores my transponder in my glider which is being pinged regularly where I fly? Explanation anyone or a pointer to where I could find an answer to my question? Thanks. Dave Dave RTFM! This is described in the manual. The MRX uses its internal altimeter to compare to the Mode C altitude tramitted by an transponder. If the values are close it assumes it is your transponder it is seeing and supresses the alert. *The exact logic/tollerances it uses however is not described. Darryl I don't own one of these yet, but I just have to ask this question. Are you saying if a target is at the same altitude as you, it will be suppressed? That is a scary thought! I would think the horizontal proximity would also be part of the suppression criteria. I don't want to speak for them but the answer is no! I have had plenty of alerts when the target is at the same altitude as myself when the unit is working. This includes my towplane and other aircraft in the same gaggle (circling with the air force gliders at a contest near radar). In normal operation you never pick up yourself if you have a transponder. Bruno - B4 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 20, 3:02*pm, Bruno wrote:
On Feb 20, 3:21*pm, Westbender wrote: On Feb 20, 11:43*am, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Feb 20, 9:10*am, kd6veb wrote: Hi Gang * This thread prompted me to think as to how the MXR unit ignores my transponder in my glider which is being pinged regularly where I fly? Explanation anyone or a pointer to where I could find an answer to my question? Thanks. Dave Dave RTFM! This is described in the manual. The MRX uses its internal altimeter to compare to the Mode C altitude tramitted by an transponder. If the values are close it assumes it is your transponder it is seeing and supresses the alert. *The exact logic/tollerances it uses however is not described. Darryl I don't own one of these yet, but I just have to ask this question. Are you saying if a target is at the same altitude as you, it will be suppressed? That is a scary thought! I would think the horizontal proximity would also be part of the suppression criteria. I don't want to speak for them but the answer is no! *I have had plenty of alerts when the target is at the same altitude as myself when the unit is working. *This includes my towplane and other aircraft in the same gaggle (circling with the air force gliders at a contest near radar). *In normal operation you never pick up yourself if you have a transponder. Bruno - B4 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The electronic technology isn't there yet.
Who wants "the boy who cried WOLF" in the cockpit, or the need to consider whether you're being interrogated by RADAR for the thing to work? Something akin to the Swiss unmentionable-on-this-forum device is needed in all aircraft. They fail too, mostly due to bad antennas. But at least you know it when the towplane or the glider launching after you are not on the visual display. Heads up! Jim On Feb 20, 3:02*pm, Bruno wrote: I have had plenty of alerts when the target is at the same altitude as myself when the unit is working. *This includes my towplane and other aircraft in the same gaggle (circling with the air force gliders at a contest near radar). *In normal operation you never pick up yourself if you have a transponder. Bruno - B4 |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 21, 10:53*am, JS wrote:
The electronic technology isn't there yet. * Who wants "the boy who cried WOLF" in the cockpit, or the need to consider whether you're being interrogated by RADAR for the thing to work? * Something akin to the Swiss unmentionable-on-this-forum device is needed in all aircraft. They fail too, mostly due to bad antennas. But at least you know it when the towplane or the glider launching after you are not on the visual display. Heads up! Jim On Feb 20, 3:02*pm, Bruno wrote: I have had plenty of alerts when the target is at the same altitude as myself when the unit is working. *This includes my towplane and other aircraft in the same gaggle (circling with the air force gliders at a contest near radar). *In normal operation you never pick up yourself if you have a transponder. Bruno - B4 Jim The false alarm/"boy who cries wolf" problem like what Andy is describing appears to be very rare with the Zaon MRX. My experience is if the MRX warns of a threat you get your eyes outside looking for it. It is (literally) eye opening how much stuff an MRX can find that you might otherwise miss. All these traffic awareness technologies, including Flarm (there I said it!) have limitations. The main limitation with Flarm is not having a magic wand to wave to get Flarm units installed in other aircraft, and many of those other aircraft have transponders today. And while it would be great to see things like PowerFLARM (PCAS, ADS-B 1090ES data-in and yes FLARM!) installed in the USA glider fleet, I expect you will never be able to convince a significant number of GA aircraft in the USA to have Flarm anything (including combined products like a PowerFLARM). Darryl Darryl |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FOR SALE: ZAON MRX | RW | Soaring | 0 | June 20th 08 05:18 PM |
Zaon XRX and a Garmin 496 | Marco Leon | Piloting | 2 | October 26th 07 06:33 PM |
GPS intrference from Zaon PCAS ?? | Carl | Soaring | 9 | May 31st 07 05:12 AM |
OT - warning to HAL RC autopilot users | ManhattanMan | Piloting | 2 | May 23rd 07 10:13 PM |
I got my Zaon XRX PCAS test flight | cpu | Products | 3 | January 27th 06 01:13 AM |