A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Military Aviation
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Hercules Engines



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #101  
Old January 19th 04, 07:44 PM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message ...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

Hey, Splaps. Next time you are ever near a DADC or it's diagram,
check out what they have at the other end of the tubing connected
to the fitting labeled *TOTAL*. Only ONE pitot tube!

Yep, the term Total means they added two sensors.

Nope, the pitot tube detects static pressure + impact pressure.
Read the book(s).


I have been writing that to you for years, Knoyle. That is why you seem
such an idiot when you insist a pitot port is a pitot tube.

Total means there is more than one sensor, nothing more.

You really don't understand how that one little opening on the end
of that pointy thing up front can detect static pressure (altitude)
as well as impact pressure (airspeed), do you. That's sad!



you mean the mud wasp home surely ?
  #102  
Old January 19th 04, 07:45 PM
running with scissors
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message ...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

Hey, Splaps. Next time you are ever near a DADC or it's diagram,
check out what they have at the other end of the tubing connected
to the fitting labeled *TOTAL*. Only ONE pitot tube!

Yep, the term Total means they added two sensors.

Nope, the pitot tube detects static pressure + impact pressure.
Read the book(s).


I have been writing that to you for years, Knoyle. That is why you seem
such an idiot when you insist a pitot port is a pitot tube.

Total means there is more than one sensor, nothing more.

You really don't understand how that one little opening on the end
of that pointy thing up front can detect static pressure (altitude)
as well as impact pressure (airspeed), do you. That's sad!



you mean the mud wasp home surely ?
  #103  
Old January 19th 04, 08:05 PM
John R Weiss
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mary Shafer" wrote...

Did you also say that you can't correct them without OAT, outside air
temperature? That's the third element of a pitot-static air data
system.


What is required -- static air temperature (SAT) or total air temperature (TAT)
for the OAT correction?

If TAT, how is it measured, and how many thermocouples are required, in what
configuration?

  #105  
Old January 20th 04, 04:49 AM
Jim Knoyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Gord Beaman" wrote in message
...
"Jim Knoyle" wrote:

Hang on here a second now Jim, you still need two samples. As Dan
says you need 'static pressure' to read the altitude from and you
need 'pitot pressure' (ram air pressure) as well as the static
pressure to derive the airspeed reading from. Sounds like you're
saying that you can read 'both' from just the 'ram air pressure'
alone. Or did I misunderstand you?

Jim has finally figued out what a pitot tube is, but somehow he still

wants
to be correct in his archive troll. It is a great paradox.


I know...ain't life a bitch John


It is amazing that Knoyle would spend so much time and money on an archive
troll about pitot tubes, when he never knew what one was.

Tell us about those mud wasps again, Splaps.


I need not go any further village idiot, Knoyle.

Your archive troll is purely a demonstration of your own stupidity,

finally
revealed for all to see.

Then tell us about the squadron of jets lost off Florida
because they didn't have P1T0 tubes!

"Well no actually, there is no pitot tube on a 727, only a screened over
pitot static port.
But thanks for being an idiot once again.
No pitot tube silly bunny.
It would be profoundly stupid to put a home for mud wasps on an airplane
flying as much as a 727."
John Tarver



  #107  
Old January 21st 04, 01:47 AM
Tarver Engineering
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

Accept it, Jimmy, you are exposed as a dumbass; for all the world to see.


  #109  
Old January 21st 04, 07:38 AM
Jim Knoyle
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message
...

"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message
...

Tell us about those mud wasps again, Splaps.


I need not go any further village idiot, Knoyle.

Your archive troll is purely a demonstration of your own stupidity,

finally
revealed for all to see.

Then tell us about the squadron of jets lost off Florida
because they didn't have P1T0 tubes!

"Well no actually, there is no pitot tube on a 727, only a screened over
pitot static port.
But thanks for being an idiot once again.
No pitot tube silly bunny.
It would be profoundly stupid to put a home for mud wasps on an airplane
flying as much as a 727."
John Tarver

Accept it, Jimmy, you are exposed as a dumbass; for all the world to see.

Then tell us about the DC generators on 777s.

"That is false, even the 777 has a DC generator for each engine and the APU.
It would be unsafe to operate a transport any other way."
John Tarver


  #110  
Old January 21st 04, 04:51 PM
Tom Mosher
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Phil Miller" wrote in message
news

Hey Splappy,

Do you remember this series of pronouncements;

From: "Tarver Engineering"
Newsgroups: rec.aviation.military
Subject: Do Hercules military aircraft use the same fuel as civilian
aircraft?
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 19:19:37 -0800
snip
wrote in message
Not really. On the T56 engine TIT = (T)urbine (I)nlet (T)empreture.


Yes really, on every jet engine TIT is Total Inlet Temperature.


Yep.

Have you considered yet, Miller, that your zero knowledge of aircraft makes
for a pretty rediculess archive troll?


Wrong numnuts.

CFM56's don't have TIT (turbine inlet temperature), they use EGT
(exhaust gas temperature).
RR Speys don't have TIT - they use ITT (interstage turbine
temperature).

Proves you don't know **** about aircraft engines or engine indicating
systems.

Tom Mosher
Senior Logistics Analyst for a MAJOR defense contractor.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch Paul Home Built 0 October 18th 04 10:14 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 April 5th 04 03:04 PM
Hercules Engines Tarver Engineering Home Built 0 January 19th 04 11:05 PM
Accident Statistics: Certified vs. Non-Certified Engines Ron Wanttaja Home Built 23 January 18th 04 05:36 PM
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) Ron Wanttaja Home Built 0 July 4th 03 04:50 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:20 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.