![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#101
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message ...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Jim Knoyle" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Jim Knoyle" wrote in message ... Hey, Splaps. Next time you are ever near a DADC or it's diagram, check out what they have at the other end of the tubing connected to the fitting labeled *TOTAL*. Only ONE pitot tube! Yep, the term Total means they added two sensors. Nope, the pitot tube detects static pressure + impact pressure. Read the book(s). I have been writing that to you for years, Knoyle. That is why you seem such an idiot when you insist a pitot port is a pitot tube. Total means there is more than one sensor, nothing more. You really don't understand how that one little opening on the end of that pointy thing up front can detect static pressure (altitude) as well as impact pressure (airspeed), do you. That's sad! you mean the mud wasp home surely ? |
#102
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jim Knoyle" wrote in message ...
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Jim Knoyle" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Jim Knoyle" wrote in message ... Hey, Splaps. Next time you are ever near a DADC or it's diagram, check out what they have at the other end of the tubing connected to the fitting labeled *TOTAL*. Only ONE pitot tube! Yep, the term Total means they added two sensors. Nope, the pitot tube detects static pressure + impact pressure. Read the book(s). I have been writing that to you for years, Knoyle. That is why you seem such an idiot when you insist a pitot port is a pitot tube. Total means there is more than one sensor, nothing more. You really don't understand how that one little opening on the end of that pointy thing up front can detect static pressure (altitude) as well as impact pressure (airspeed), do you. That's sad! you mean the mud wasp home surely ? |
#103
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Mary Shafer" wrote...
Did you also say that you can't correct them without OAT, outside air temperature? That's the third element of a pitot-static air data system. What is required -- static air temperature (SAT) or total air temperature (TAT) for the OAT correction? If TAT, how is it measured, and how many thermocouples are required, in what configuration? |
#104
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#105
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Jim Knoyle" wrote in message ... "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Gord Beaman" wrote in message ... "Jim Knoyle" wrote: Hang on here a second now Jim, you still need two samples. As Dan says you need 'static pressure' to read the altitude from and you need 'pitot pressure' (ram air pressure) as well as the static pressure to derive the airspeed reading from. Sounds like you're saying that you can read 'both' from just the 'ram air pressure' alone. Or did I misunderstand you? Jim has finally figued out what a pitot tube is, but somehow he still wants to be correct in his archive troll. It is a great paradox. I know...ain't life a bitch John ![]() ![]() It is amazing that Knoyle would spend so much time and money on an archive troll about pitot tubes, when he never knew what one was. Tell us about those mud wasps again, Splaps. I need not go any further village idiot, Knoyle. Your archive troll is purely a demonstration of your own stupidity, finally revealed for all to see. Then tell us about the squadron of jets lost off Florida because they didn't have P1T0 tubes! "Well no actually, there is no pitot tube on a 727, only a screened over pitot static port. But thanks for being an idiot once again. No pitot tube silly bunny. It would be profoundly stupid to put a home for mud wasps on an airplane flying as much as a 727." John Tarver |
#106
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mary Shafer" wrote in message ... On 18 Jan 2004 08:08:50 GMT, (B2431) wrote: From: "Gord Beaman" ) Date: 1/18/2004 12:48 AM Central Standard Time Message-id: (B2431) wrote: OK, I see where you are coming from. The pitot pressure DOES vary by altitude. To compensate for that when measuring airspeed you use static pressure to give you altitude. Some aircraft detect static pressure from holes on the side of the pitot tube and others have the static ports located elswhere. But you need BOTH Dan, you cannot measure airspeed AND altitude unless you have BOTH pitot pressure AND static pressure... That's what I said. Did you also say that you can't correct them without OAT, outside air temperature? That's the third element of a pitot-static air data system. Yes, but would you believe that this whole squabble began by trying to correct Tarver's misconception that the "Total" fitting of the two fittings on an air data computer (labeled Static and Total) referred to two or more pitot gizmos (Tarver hates to call them tubes) instead of altitude pressure plus impact pressure? JK |
#107
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jim Knoyle" wrote in message ... Accept it, Jimmy, you are exposed as a dumbass; for all the world to see. |
#108
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#109
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ... "Jim Knoyle" wrote in message ... Tell us about those mud wasps again, Splaps. I need not go any further village idiot, Knoyle. Your archive troll is purely a demonstration of your own stupidity, finally revealed for all to see. Then tell us about the squadron of jets lost off Florida because they didn't have P1T0 tubes! "Well no actually, there is no pitot tube on a 727, only a screened over pitot static port. But thanks for being an idiot once again. No pitot tube silly bunny. It would be profoundly stupid to put a home for mud wasps on an airplane flying as much as a 727." John Tarver Accept it, Jimmy, you are exposed as a dumbass; for all the world to see. Then tell us about the DC generators on 777s. "That is false, even the 777 has a DC generator for each engine and the APU. It would be unsafe to operate a transport any other way." John Tarver |
#110
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Tarver Engineering" wrote in message ...
"Phil Miller" wrote in message news ![]() Hey Splappy, Do you remember this series of pronouncements; From: "Tarver Engineering" Newsgroups: rec.aviation.military Subject: Do Hercules military aircraft use the same fuel as civilian aircraft? Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 19:19:37 -0800 snip wrote in message Not really. On the T56 engine TIT = (T)urbine (I)nlet (T)empreture. Yes really, on every jet engine TIT is Total Inlet Temperature. Yep. Have you considered yet, Miller, that your zero knowledge of aircraft makes for a pretty rediculess archive troll? Wrong numnuts. CFM56's don't have TIT (turbine inlet temperature), they use EGT (exhaust gas temperature). RR Speys don't have TIT - they use ITT (interstage turbine temperature). Proves you don't know **** about aircraft engines or engine indicating systems. Tom Mosher Senior Logistics Analyst for a MAJOR defense contractor. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Book Review: Converting Auto Engines for Experimental Aircraft , Finch | Paul | Home Built | 0 | October 18th 04 10:14 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | April 5th 04 03:04 PM |
Hercules Engines | Tarver Engineering | Home Built | 0 | January 19th 04 11:05 PM |
Accident Statistics: Certified vs. Non-Certified Engines | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 23 | January 18th 04 05:36 PM |
Homebuilt Aircraft Frequently-Asked Questions (FAQ) | Ron Wanttaja | Home Built | 0 | July 4th 03 04:50 PM |