A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

More restrictions for "experimental"



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 22nd 10, 08:26 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Doug Haluza
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 175
Default More restrictions for "experimental"

On Mar 21, 7:24*pm, Frank Whiteley wrote:
On Mar 21, 9:14*am, Andy wrote:

snip
(35) Proficiency flights are authorized without geographical
restrictions when conducted in
preparation for participation in sanctioned meets and pursuant to
qualify for Federal Aeronautique
International (FAI) or Soaring Society of America (SSA) awards. These
flights may only take place as
defined in the applicant’s program letter, and prior to the specific
FAI or SSA event. The pilot in
command must submit a description of the intended route and/or
geographical area intended to be flown
to the local FSDO.
(Applicability: Group I, gliders only)

snip
*I would recommend active participation in the IGC(FAI)/OLC contest,
every flight. *As SSA state governor, I recognize OLC participation
annually in addition to other achievements. *http://www.coloradosoaring..org/awards.htm

snip

Yes, the SSA does sanction the OLC in the US, and the SSA presents
annual awards nationally, and for each SSA region, for SSA-OLC
Classic, Trangle and League. The SSA state governors are free to make
additional awards in their areas as well. FAI also sanctions the FAI-
OLC League and FAI-OLC triangle portion of the OLC worldwide. One
twist here is that the OLC 'event' runs all year to the second Monday
of October, so this would not conicide with a January 1 annual program
letter period. I would suggest that you could specify in your program
letter which SSA regions you intend to compete in, and this should
meet the specificity requirement. You would have to be registered as
an OLC competitor, have a suitable logger, and upload flight claims on
a regular basis to make this legit. Note that the SSA does not enforce
membership requirements for participation in the OLC, but we only
recognize members for awards, same as the FAI. So you would have to be
an SSA member to be considered a competitor at the SAA-OLC regional or
national level, and/or a member of NAA with a sporting license to
compete in the OLC-i (international) and for NAA national and FAI
world records.

Doug Haluza, CGIG
SSA-OLC Committe Chair
  #2  
Old March 22nd 10, 10:51 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Tuno
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 640
Default More restrictions for "experimental"

I'm curious about the "All proficiency flights will be conducted in
airspace within an operational radius of 300 nautical miles from the
airport where the aircraft is based" part.

What defines the aircraft's base of operations?

Am I limited to one BofO per year? If not, then how many? Perhaps if I
plan on doing a 500 mile straight-out, I can declare a new BofO for
the second half of the flight?

I'm imagining a 21st century flight recorder that wirelessly emails
the FSDO a new BofO declaration when a GPS fix approaches the 300 mile
limit from the last one ...
  #3  
Old March 23rd 10, 05:58 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Andy[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,565
Default More restrictions for "experimental"

On Mar 22, 3:51*pm, Tuno wrote:

What defines the aircraft's base of operations?


There is no base of operations defined in any of my certification
docs. They do, however include the 300nm restriction relative to that
undefined location. Go figure.

In my program letter I have said "Based at Pleasant Valley", "Stored
at, but not flown from, Deer Valley", and currently "Stored at the
home of the owner", depending it which was true for any given year.

My program letters have never bounced, but I always assumed that was
because no one even read them. No doubt that will change as the pot
gets stirred by our local FSDO.

Andy (GY)

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"VideO Madness" ( Soldiers...) "GoD Hates FAGS!!! (He sO righteOusly DoES)" Colonel Jake Naval Aviation 0 March 1st 10 12:14 AM
Experimental Certificate Granted UAV If MAC "Extremely Improbable"! Larry Dighera Piloting 71 March 6th 08 11:14 PM
"V-22 Mishap Probe Prompts US Fleet Restrictions" Mike[_7_] Naval Aviation 0 December 10th 07 03:10 PM
Flight Restrictions on non-amateur built experimental aircraft?? Don W Home Built 9 April 20th 07 11:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.