![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mike
You didn't give much data for anyone to make valid comments on. 1. Type and age of engine.(Including hours) 2. Type flying it has been doing (acrobatics, XC , training in pattern, etc.) 3. Cylinder compression. 4. Type oil and how often it has been changed. 5. How often flown and whether hangered or tied down and part of country you are in. .Any other things you can think of. Oil analysis is basically a trend monitoring system. After establishing a trend and you then come to a knee, you know to do something about it before you have a major failure I read the report recommendation "to sample next oil change to check wear trend" as that they didn't find any incipient failure and to check next oil change for any change in the analysis trend. Anyone else want to add to these comments? The Air Force started oil analysis many years ago and used to pull an engine when the analysis showed excessive wear inside. Big John On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 15:45:54 -0400, Michael Horowitz wrote: I did my first oil change, had an oil analysis done and got back the results. Two figures were flagged: 20ppm for AL and 99ppm for Iron with the following comments: Wear Metals Appear Slightly High for Oil Time, and Possible Corrosion if Aircraft Not Flown Regularly. It concluded with the recommendation to sample next oil change to check wear trend. Is it time to panic or just note the figures with interest? - Mike |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Air Force started oil analysis many years ago and used to pull an
engine when the analysis showed excessive wear inside. Naval Aviation does the same. Watch the trend. Larry AECS (AW/SW/MTS) Disabled Combat Veteran USN Retired 20 years of Navy in my rear view mirror and getting further away every day ;-) "Big John" wrote in message ... Mike You didn't give much data for anyone to make valid comments on. 1. Type and age of engine.(Including hours) 2. Type flying it has been doing (acrobatics, XC , training in pattern, etc.) 3. Cylinder compression. 4. Type oil and how often it has been changed. 5. How often flown and whether hangered or tied down and part of country you are in. .Any other things you can think of. Oil analysis is basically a trend monitoring system. After establishing a trend and you then come to a knee, you know to do something about it before you have a major failure I read the report recommendation "to sample next oil change to check wear trend" as that they didn't find any incipient failure and to check next oil change for any change in the analysis trend. Anyone else want to add to these comments? The Air Force started oil analysis many years ago and used to pull an engine when the analysis showed excessive wear inside. Big John On Sat, 25 Oct 2003 15:45:54 -0400, Michael Horowitz wrote: I did my first oil change, had an oil analysis done and got back the results. Two figures were flagged: 20ppm for AL and 99ppm for Iron with the following comments: Wear Metals Appear Slightly High for Oil Time, and Possible Corrosion if Aircraft Not Flown Regularly. It concluded with the recommendation to sample next oil change to check wear trend. Is it time to panic or just note the figures with interest? - Mike |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Objective Engine Discussion | Rick Maddy | Home Built | 26 | October 14th 03 04:46 AM |
Ford V-6 engine work | Corky Scott | Home Built | 19 | August 21st 03 12:04 PM |
1710 allison v-12 engine WWII p 38 engine | Holger Stephan | Home Built | 9 | August 21st 03 08:53 AM |
Corky's engine choice | Corky Scott | Home Built | 39 | August 8th 03 04:29 AM |
Gasflow of VW engine | Veeduber | Home Built | 4 | July 14th 03 08:06 AM |