![]() |
If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 6, 9:34*am, Darryl Ramm wrote:
On Apr 5, 8:32*am, soarski wrote: On Apr 3, 8:58*am, Fred wrote: Dave asks a good question here. He and I discussed this in the hangar before he posted it, and I didn't have a good answer then. *After giving it more thought I tend to lean in favor of 1200 because he is flying in airspace where gliders are not a common experience (into and out of San Jose's busy airspace) and he can maneuver differently than I am able to do in a Duo Discus -- which I wouldn't fly into San Jose or the Bay Area in any case. But I'd be interested in other thoughts on this question. Fred LaSor SoaringNV Minden, NV Did I not just read in the FAA rules Code 1201 if not in contact with ATC, which would mean in many cases that we stay with 1200 as long as we take off at controlled airports or similar. Leaving the area we might report switching to 1201??? *......Awaiting a possible question about that *code? *This would apply to many motorgliders. Dieter, Stemme S10V This may be confusing the matter more than it needs to be. Putting aside the question about motorgliders, "in contact with ATC" in this case implies a facility with/providing radar services, i.e. situations in which you were on a flight plan or flight following and would be assigned a discrete squawk code, if you are just taking off say from a typical Class D airport you are not receiving radar services Darryl- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not quite so....Initially when I flew my S10 out of my airport, I did not turn on my Transponder since I did not have to and do not have the batteries for it. One day testing it, the tower found out that I had one and pleaded to at least have it on while under power, since we have an incredible amount of jet traffic here. They are very appreciative about it. I am never on a flightplan or am asigned my own code, just 1200! Tower controlers hardly look outside anymore, they depend on their screens. Happily will point out traffic etc. I do not see a big deal about all this. Remember Gliders do not need a TXponder yet. So If one is used in a glider, you have a choice now, 1200 or 1201. If you use the later, it will help who ever is looking at you. Wait till all of us have to use Mode S....Then ATC will know who you are no matter what you are squaking including your phone #. Some wheels turn slower than others, nothing to get exited about. Most likely by the end of summer, leaving the local airspace, tower might say as I climb thru 15000... You may squak 1201 now. If I am behind Capitol Peak he wont see me anymore anyway, but some "fast Heavy" arriving from the west will or may not, depending what stage of the game my transponder and my batteries are in. BTW Tower and approach control is ATC also soarski |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
soarski wrote:
On Apr 6, 9:34 am, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Apr 5, 8:32 am, soarski wrote: On Apr 3, 8:58 am, Fred wrote: Dave asks a good question here. He and I discussed this in the hangar before he posted it, and I didn't have a good answer then. After giving it more thought I tend to lean in favor of 1200 because he is flying in airspace where gliders are not a common experience (into and out of San Jose's busy airspace) and he can maneuver differently than I am able to do in a Duo Discus -- which I wouldn't fly into San Jose or the Bay Area in any case. But I'd be interested in other thoughts on this question. Fred LaSor SoaringNV Minden, NV Did I not just read in the FAA rules Code 1201 if not in contact with ATC, which would mean in many cases that we stay with 1200 as long as we take off at controlled airports or similar. Leaving the area we might report switching to 1201??? ......Awaiting a possible question about that code? This would apply to many motorgliders. Dieter, Stemme S10V This may be confusing the matter more than it needs to be. Putting aside the question about motorgliders, "in contact with ATC" in this case implies a facility with/providing radar services, i.e. situations in which you were on a flight plan or flight following and would be assigned a discrete squawk code, if you are just taking off say from a typical Class D airport you are not receiving radar services Darryl- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not quite so....Initially when I flew my S10 out of my airport, I did not turn on my Transponder since I did not have to and do not have the batteries for it. One day testing it, the tower found out that I had one and pleaded to at least have it on while under power, since we have an incredible amount of jet traffic here. They are very appreciative about it. I am never on a flightplan or am asigned my own code, just 1200! Tower controlers hardly look outside anymore, they depend on their screens. Happily will point out traffic etc. I do not see a big deal about all this. Remember Gliders do not need a TXponder yet. So If one is used in a glider, you have a choice now, 1200 or 1201. If you use the later, it will help who ever is looking at you. Wait till all of us have to use Mode S....Then ATC will know who you are no matter what you are squaking including your phone #. Some wheels turn slower than others, nothing to get exited about. Most likely by the end of summer, leaving the local airspace, tower might say as I climb thru 15000... You may squak 1201 now. If I am behind Capitol Peak he wont see me anymore anyway, but some "fast Heavy" arriving from the west will or may not, depending what stage of the game my transponder and my batteries are in. BTW Tower and approach control is ATC also soarski Actually, I don't believe 1200 is just for powered aircraft. 1200 signifies "VFR" flight. ANY type of aircraft can fly VFR...ultralights, airships, gliders, rotorcraft, etc. Granted 1201 might be nice to help ATC determine who has "right of way" in any situation... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 6, 3:40*pm, soarski wrote:
On Apr 6, 9:34*am, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Apr 5, 8:32*am, soarski wrote: On Apr 3, 8:58*am, Fred wrote: Dave asks a good question here. He and I discussed this in the hangar before he posted it, and I didn't have a good answer then. *After giving it more thought I tend to lean in favor of 1200 because he is flying in airspace where gliders are not a common experience (into and out of San Jose's busy airspace) and he can maneuver differently than I am able to do in a Duo Discus -- which I wouldn't fly into San Jose or the Bay Area in any case. But I'd be interested in other thoughts on this question. Fred LaSor SoaringNV Minden, NV Did I not just read in the FAA rules Code 1201 if not in contact with ATC, which would mean in many cases that we stay with 1200 as long as we take off at controlled airports or similar. Leaving the area we might report switching to 1201??? *......Awaiting a possible question about that *code? *This would apply to many motorgliders. Dieter, Stemme S10V This may be confusing the matter more than it needs to be. Putting aside the question about motorgliders, "in contact with ATC" in this case implies a facility with/providing radar services, i.e. situations in which you were on a flight plan or flight following and would be assigned a discrete squawk code, if you are just taking off say from a typical Class D airport you are not receiving radar services Darryl- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not quite so....Initially when I flew my S10 out of my airport, I did not turn on my Transponder since I did not have to and do not have the batteries for it. One day testing it, the tower found out that I had one and pleaded to at least have it on while under power, since we have an incredible amount of jet traffic here. They are very appreciative about it. I am never on a flightplan or am asigned my own code, just 1200! *Tower controlers hardly look outside anymore, they depend on their screens. Happily will point out traffic etc. I do not see a big deal about all this. Remember Gliders do not need a TXponder yet. So If one is used in a glider, you have a choice now, 1200 or 1201. If you use the later, it will help who ever is looking at you. Wait till all of us have to use Mode S....Then ATC will know who you are no matter what you are squaking including your phone #. Some wheels turn slower than others, nothing to get exited about. Most likely by the end of summer, leaving the local airspace, tower might say as I climb thru 15000... You may squak 1201 now. If I am behind Capitol Peak he wont see me anymore anyway, but some "fast Heavy" arriving from the west will or may not, depending what stage of the game my transponder and my batteries are in. BTW Tower and approach control is ATC also soarski No. No and No. Can I be any clearer? Technically you are required to turn your transponder on if installed. And the tower folks probably were bemused why you were not. A Stemme should have lots of power available for a modern low-power transponder (Becker, Trig etc). And for God's sake if it's installed and you are flying near heavy traffic, turn it on. Do you know for sure that the tower controllers have radar? Which class D do you fly out of? The tower may well want to make sure you are visible to approach/tracon radar services once you leave the airport vicinity. You won't get assigned a discreet code unless you file a flight plan or use flight following. Just departing a class D airport VFR with no flight plan you will not get a unique code, that's expected. You would normally get a discrete code for flight following if you contact approach or a similar facility providing radar services once airborne and request flight following. It seems you are flying around traffic near controlled airspace and maybe could do with sitting down with somebody, maybe an power instructor, and going over how ATC operates, how to use things like flight following, etc. I am well aware what ATC is but I was trying to explain to you how it was being used in what you were reading. The document was referring to radar services when saying ATC and your question about squawking 1200 if in touch with a tower was confusing this discussion. If is at all not clear that 1201 will automatically "help whoever is looking at you". Did you miss the people in this thread warning to check with your local ATC facilities (e.g. likely approach/TRACON not tower) about wether they can handle 1201. I know some will treat 1201 exactly the same as 1200 and just see the "V" for VFR symbol on their display (confirmed today that is the situation with Oakland ARTCC). Some others facilities may have problems with 1201 and not want that squawked. Clearly everybody has been caught hopping by this announcement of the allocation, but it's an allocation of a national code, not an national announcement that facilities are ready to handle this or to pilots what to do. Darryl |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 6, 3:40*pm, soarski wrote:
On Apr 6, 9:34*am, Darryl Ramm wrote: On Apr 5, 8:32*am, soarski wrote: On Apr 3, 8:58*am, Fred wrote: Dave asks a good question here. He and I discussed this in the hangar before he posted it, and I didn't have a good answer then. *After giving it more thought I tend to lean in favor of 1200 because he is flying in airspace where gliders are not a common experience (into and out of San Jose's busy airspace) and he can maneuver differently than I am able to do in a Duo Discus -- which I wouldn't fly into San Jose or the Bay Area in any case. But I'd be interested in other thoughts on this question. Fred LaSor SoaringNV Minden, NV Did I not just read in the FAA rules Code 1201 if not in contact with ATC, which would mean in many cases that we stay with 1200 as long as we take off at controlled airports or similar. Leaving the area we might report switching to 1201??? *......Awaiting a possible question about that *code? *This would apply to many motorgliders. Dieter, Stemme S10V This may be confusing the matter more than it needs to be. Putting aside the question about motorgliders, "in contact with ATC" in this case implies a facility with/providing radar services, i.e. situations in which you were on a flight plan or flight following and would be assigned a discrete squawk code, if you are just taking off say from a typical Class D airport you are not receiving radar services Darryl- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Not quite so....Initially when I flew my S10 out of my airport, I did not turn on my Transponder since I did not have to and do not have the batteries for it. One day testing it, the tower found out that I had one and pleaded to at least have it on while under power, since we have an incredible amount of jet traffic here. They are very appreciative about it. I am never on a flightplan or am asigned my own code, just 1200! *Tower controlers hardly look outside anymore, they depend on their screens. Happily will point out traffic etc. I do not see a big deal about all this. Remember Gliders do not need a TXponder yet. So If one is used in a glider, you have a choice now, 1200 or 1201. If you use the later, it will help who ever is looking at you. Wait till all of us have to use Mode S....Then ATC will know who you are no matter what you are squaking including your phone #. Some wheels turn slower than others, nothing to get exited about. Most likely by the end of summer, leaving the local airspace, tower might say as I climb thru 15000... You may squak 1201 now. If I am behind Capitol Peak he wont see me anymore anyway, but some "fast Heavy" arriving from the west will or may not, depending what stage of the game my transponder and my batteries are in. BTW Tower and approach control is ATC also soarski BTW to be clear about the 1201 and TCAS and that fast-heavy.... TCAS won't care whether you squawk 1200, 1201 or a discrete code. TCAS only interrogates Mode C or Mode S, and does not and cannot see your Mode A/ C transponder's squawk code. Darryl |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
squawk code 2000 | Gordy | Instrument Flight Rules | 2 | March 14th 07 11:21 PM |
Nationwide aircraft rentals | Lou | Home Built | 1 | February 2nd 05 12:31 AM |
Squawk Sheets | Greg Esres | Piloting | 23 | August 23rd 04 08:15 PM |
Private strips nationwide - is there a LIST? | [email protected] | Piloting | 9 | November 20th 03 11:08 PM |