A aviation & planes forum. AviationBanter

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » AviationBanter forum » rec.aviation newsgroups » Soaring
Site Map Home Register Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Pneumatics Question



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old May 25th 10, 10:16 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Bob Salvo[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Pneumatics Question

Get rid of the 4-way connector. They are unreliable, sometimes
causing cross-talk between paths. For peace of mind, use separate
connectors.

Bob


- then traced my original TE troubles to a leak in the 4-way connector
at the panel. *Replaced the connector this year.

  #2  
Old May 25th 10, 11:22 PM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
sisu1a
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 569
Default Pneumatics Question

Get rid of the 4-way connector. *They are unreliable, sometimes
causing cross-talk between paths. *For peace of mind, use separate
connectors.



He mentioned it's a 5 way (although only 4 ports are currently being
used) in another post, which I mean to take is a Winter unit. I've
personally had good luck with those but I still prefer the positive
locking threaded compression connection of my 4 way PZL version. I've
had no leaks with either though, nor any crosstalk (ahem- well just be
sure you didn't x-thread the PZL unit back together on after you show
it off just before takeoff... heh.) Only problems I've heard of with
the quick connects are leaks when the stock O-rings are old/crusty,
which is an easy inspection/replacement (spend the extra $.12 on
Viton!). While crosstalk is possible on the PZL 4-way with it's
compression loaded seals, on the Winter 5-way there is no *real chance
of it as the o-rings form a male seal at least 1/4" into the female
sockets, effectively isolating the individual lines from each other in
case of seal failure, even with dual seal failure. Rubber is not
ageless... and again, silicone (spray, applied via cotton swab) is
your friend, same for the probe/socket...

It's also unlikely a probe connection problem since it is not a double-
probe and I feel safe to assume the probe gets taped at each assembly
of course. Borrowing a probe from another ship will help isolate any
problems with the probe itself it It winds up being suspect.

I may just have tunnelvision but really I think an old vario (with
aged internal seals...) that has pitot and TE seems more suspect of
crosstalk issues than a new Winter quick connect or probe performance
issues...

Slightly OT, I like to use these to seal pneumatic instrument hoses on
barbs:
http://www.jollygerman.com/products/goats/rings.shtml cheap, last
bout 5yrs and gives a uniform 360deg seal (UNlike zipties...) that is
easily future-accessed with no damage to hose/barb. Got idea from
Borgelt but it took me a while to figure out what these little green
rubber Cheerio things were *really* used for... OUCHY!!!

-Paul

  #3  
Old May 26th 10, 12:15 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
Peter Gray
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 6
Default Pneumatics Question


It's also unlikely a probe connection problem since it is not a double-
probe and I feel safe to assume the probe gets taped at each assembly
of course. Borrowing a probe from another ship will help isolate any
problems with the probe itself it It winds up being suspect.


The Brunswick socket won't have any internal seals. Just one tube
inside another. Tape is unreliable. A short length of silicon tube
tightly fitted over the joint is better. If the tube can stay in situ
in the trailer then wire it or castrate it with a couple of Cheerios
and leave it well alone.

I may just have tunnelvision but really I think an old vario (with
aged internal seals...) that has pitot and TE seems more suspect of
crosstalk issues than a new Winter quick connect or probe performance
issues...


Seems the first port of call for an elimination exercise. I await some
more real data with fascination.



  #4  
Old May 26th 10, 01:38 AM posted to rec.aviation.soaring
jsbrake[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 87
Default Pneumatics Question

Whee ! Looks like I'm in for some fun this coming weekend, trying to
figure out what's leaking. I'll probably fly it in the daytime and
try to test it during the evening, or bring the panel home to test the
varios.

I think I was happier before I asked the question... oh well, test it
out and get it working nicely.

Thanks to all for the information and advice; I'll report back when I
figure it out.

-John
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
I want to ask you the most important question of your life. The question is: Are you saved? It is no gasman Soaring 0 August 26th 05 06:39 PM
Good morning or good evening depending upon your location. I want to ask you the most important question of your life. Your joy or sorrow for all eternity depends upon your answer. The question is: Are you saved? It is not a question of how good Excelsior Home Built 0 April 22nd 05 01:11 AM
Question re CNX-80 ROBIN FLY Instrument Flight Rules 6 April 15th 04 04:05 PM
Question about KLN-89B Casey Wilson Instrument Flight Rules 9 March 8th 04 08:07 PM
Question about Question 4488 [email protected] Instrument Flight Rules 3 October 27th 03 01:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:35 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 AviationBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.